Chan Ryan K K, Choi Eric M F, Chou Crystal Y Y, Lam Alvin K, Sun Eliza R, Kwong Patrick W H, Yu Clare C W, Tsang Sharon M H
Room ST535, Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Kowloon, Hong Kong.
Sci Rep. 2025 Apr 2;15(1):11242. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-96048-w.
Lumbar hyperlordosis and foot overpronation are associated with low back pain with extension pattern. This study examined if standing and walking on inclined surface or gluteus maximus activation alleviates the extent of lumbar lordosis and foot pronation amongst individuals with LBP who were classified with extension pattern. Eighteen adults with foot overpronation (LBP group, n = 9 and non-LBP group, n = 9) participated in this cross-sectional and case-control comparison study. Lumbar lordotic angle and rearfoot angle were measured using surface tomography, during standing and walking on treadmill at inclinations of 0°, 6° and 9°, and voluntary gluteus maximus activation at 20%, 40% and 60% of maximal contraction in standing at 0° inclination. The lumbar lordosis angle and rearfoot angle were compared within-group and between two groups across the listed trials in standing and walking. Results indicated no significant change in lumbar lordosis or rearfoot angle in LBP group when standing or walking on 6°or 9°inclined surface (p > 0.05). However, voluntary gluteus maximus activation in standing at the level of 20%, 40% and 60% of maximal effort reduced lumbar lordotic angle (p < 0.05) but not rearfoot angle (p > 0.05) in LBP group. Our findings provide a novel approach to address the hyperlordosis in LBP group with extension pattern, for which voluntary gluteus maximus activation of ≥ 20% of maximal effort could effectively reduce the extent of the lumbar lordosis in level-ground standing in the LBP group. Such modified lumbar posture may alleviate the compressive loading on the spine associated with static upright standing at our daily activities. Increased gluteus maximus activation found during inclined walking may be beneficial to those with LBP and extension pattern.
腰椎前凸过度和足过度内旋与后伸型下腰痛相关。本研究探讨了在倾斜表面站立和行走或激活臀大肌是否能减轻后伸型下腰痛患者的腰椎前凸程度和足内旋程度。18名足过度内旋的成年人(下腰痛组,n = 9;非下腰痛组,n = 9)参与了这项横断面病例对照比较研究。使用表面断层扫描测量腰椎前凸角和后足角,测量条件为在0°、6°和9°倾斜度的跑步机上站立和行走时,以及在0°倾斜度站立时,以最大收缩力的20%、40%和60%进行臀大肌自主激活时。在列出的站立和行走试验中,比较了组内以及两组之间的腰椎前凸角和后足角。结果表明,下腰痛组在6°或9°倾斜表面站立或行走时,腰椎前凸或后足角无显著变化(p > 0.05)。然而,下腰痛组在站立时以最大努力的20%、40%和60%进行臀大肌自主激活,可使腰椎前凸角减小(p < 0.05),但后足角无变化(p > 0.05)。我们的研究结果提供了一种新方法来解决后伸型下腰痛组的腰椎前凸过度问题,即下腰痛组在平地站立时,以最大努力的≥20%进行臀大肌自主激活可有效减小腰椎前凸程度。这种改善后的腰椎姿势可能会减轻日常活动中静态直立站立时脊柱所承受的压缩负荷。在倾斜行走时发现的臀大肌激活增加可能对后伸型下腰痛患者有益。