Wolf Sebastian, Weber Sarah, Janetta Aaron, Klein Friederike, Enssle Julius C, Hogardt Michael, Kempf Volkhard A J, Kessel Johanna, Vehreschild Maria J G T, Steffen Björn, Oellerich Thomas, Serve Hubert, Scheich Sebastian
Department of Medicine II-Hematology and Oncology, Goethe-University Frankfurt, University Hospital, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60590, Frankfurt, Germany.
Frankfurt Cancer Institute (FCI), Frankfurt, Germany.
Infection. 2025 Apr 2. doi: 10.1007/s15010-025-02513-z.
Bloodstream infections (BSI) due to Candida spp. significantly contribute to morbidity and mortality among cancer patients. Understanding their clinical course, risk factors, and outcomes compared to bacterial BSI is essential.
We aim to elucidate the epidemiology and risk factors associated with Candida BSI compared to bacterial BSI in cancer patients.
We analyzed epidemiological data of Candida BSI versus bacterial BSI among cancer patients, primarily with hematological malignancies. Blood cultures were obtained upon clinical suspicion, with species identification by VITEK 2 and MALDI-TOF. Susceptibility testing utilized VITEK 2 or antibiotic gradient tests.
Candida BSI was associated with higher 30-day mortality compared to bacterial BSI (Hazard ratio (HR) 4.5, 95% CI 2.5-8.1, p < 0.001) occurring predominantly in patients with relapsed/refractory disease. Univariate analysis identified risk factors for Candida BSI: hypoalbuminemia (Odds ratio (OR) 9.13, 95% CI 2.7-57, p = 0.003), prior ICU/MC stay (OR 3.91, 95% CI 1.38-9.65, p = 0.005), palliative treatment (OR 3.42, 95% CI 1.52-7.4, p = 0.002), parenteral nutrition (OR 2.44, 95% CI 0.9-5.5, p = 0.039) and prior allogeneic HSCT (OR 2.28, 95% CI 0.92-5.13, p = 0.056). Risk factors identified by multivariate analysis were palliative therapy (OR 5.23, 95% CI 3.14-8.71, p = 0.001), hypoalbuminemia (OR 9.02, 95% CI 4.23-19.2, p = 0.004), and prior ICU/IMC stay (OR 4, 95% CI 2.31-6.92, p = 0.011). In patients with confirmed Candida BSI, delayed initiation of antifungal was associated with worse outcomes.
Compared to bacterial BSI events, Candida BSI are associated with significantly higher 30-day mortality, primarily affecting heavily pretreated patients with relapsed or refractory disease.
念珠菌属引起的血流感染(BSI)显著增加了癌症患者的发病率和死亡率。了解其临床病程、危险因素及与细菌性血流感染相比的结局至关重要。
我们旨在阐明与癌症患者细菌性血流感染相比,念珠菌血流感染的流行病学及相关危险因素。
我们分析了癌症患者中念珠菌血流感染与细菌性血流感染的流行病学数据,主要是血液系统恶性肿瘤患者。临床怀疑时采集血培养样本,通过VITEK 2和基质辅助激光解吸电离飞行时间质谱进行菌种鉴定。药敏试验采用VITEK 2或抗生素梯度试验。
与细菌性血流感染相比,念珠菌血流感染的30天死亡率更高(风险比(HR)4.5,95%置信区间2.5 - 8.1,p < 0.001),主要发生在复发/难治性疾病患者中。单因素分析确定了念珠菌血流感染的危险因素:低白蛋白血症(优势比(OR)9.13,95%置信区间2.7 - 57,p = 0.003)、既往入住重症监护病房/中间监护病房(OR 3.91,95%置信区间1.38 - 9.65,p = 0.005)、姑息治疗(OR 3.42,95%置信区间1.52 - 7.4,p = 0.002)、肠外营养(OR 2.44,95%置信区间0.9 - 5.5,p = 0.039)和既往异基因造血干细胞移植(OR 2.28,95%置信区间0.92 - 5.13,p = 0.056)。多因素分析确定的危险因素为姑息治疗(OR 5.23,95%置信区间3.14 - 8.71,p = 0.001)、低白蛋白血症(OR 9.02,95%置信区间4.23 - 19.2,p = 0.004)和既往入住重症监护病房/中间监护病房(OR 4,95%置信区间2.31 - 6.92,p = 0.011)。在确诊为念珠菌血流感染的患者中,抗真菌治疗开始延迟与较差的结局相关。
与细菌性血流感染事件相比,念珠菌血流感染的30天死亡率显著更高,主要影响经过大量预处理的复发或难治性疾病患者。