• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Comparison between single bolus dose administration and continuous infusion of remimazolam for general anesthesia induction in non-cardiac surgery: a single-center prospective randomized controlled trial.单次推注剂量与持续输注瑞马唑仑用于非心脏手术全身麻醉诱导的比较:一项单中心前瞻性随机对照试验。
BMC Anesthesiol. 2025 Apr 2;25(1):150. doi: 10.1186/s12871-025-03032-y.
2
Efficacy of Single-Bolus Administration of Remimazolam During Induction of Anesthesia in Patients Undergoing Cardiac Surgery: A Prospective, Single-Center, Randomized Controlled Study.瑞马唑仑单次给药在心脏手术患者麻醉诱导中的疗效:一项前瞻性、单中心、随机对照研究。
Anesth Analg. 2024 Oct 1;139(4):770-780. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000006861. Epub 2024 Feb 5.
3
Dose Equivalence of Remimazolam and Propofol for Loss of Consciousness in Pediatric Patients: A Randomized Clinical Trial.瑞马唑仑与丙泊酚用于小儿患者意识消失的等效剂量:一项随机临床试验
Pain Physician. 2024 Nov;27(8):521-528.
4
Remimazolam for induction of anesthesia in elderly patients with severe aortic stenosis: a prospective, observational pilot study.瑞马唑仑用于严重主动脉瓣狭窄老年患者麻醉诱导:一项前瞻性、观察性的初步研究。
BMC Anesthesiol. 2021 Dec 6;21(1):306. doi: 10.1186/s12871-021-01530-3.
5
Remimazolam to prevent hemodynamic instability during catheter ablation under general anesthesia: a randomized controlled trial.瑞马唑仑预防全麻下导管消融术中心血管不稳定的随机对照试验。
Can J Anaesth. 2024 Aug;71(8):1067-1077. doi: 10.1007/s12630-024-02735-z. Epub 2024 Apr 12.
6
Comparison of remimazolam tosilate and propofol during induction and maintenance of general anesthesia in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a prospective, single center, randomized controlled trial.瑞马唑仑甲苯磺酸盐与丙泊酚在腹腔镜胆囊切除术患者全麻诱导和维持中的比较:一项前瞻性、单中心、随机对照试验。
BMC Anesthesiol. 2024 Jul 6;24(1):226. doi: 10.1186/s12871-024-02614-6.
7
Safety and efficacy of remimazolam compared with propofol for general anesthesia during cold knife conization: a single-center, randomized controlled trial.瑞米唑仑与丙泊酚用于冷刀锥切术中全身麻醉的安全性和有效性:一项单中心随机对照试验
BMC Anesthesiol. 2025 Apr 23;25(1):197. doi: 10.1186/s12871-025-03066-2.
8
Effective bolus dose of remimazolam for i-gel insertion in nonparalyzed patients: a dose-finding study.瑞马唑仑用于非肌松患者插入 i-gel 时的有效负荷剂量:一项剂量探索研究。
Can J Anaesth. 2024 Sep;71(9):1251-1260. doi: 10.1007/s12630-024-02762-w. Epub 2024 Apr 26.
9
Comparison of remimazolam-based and propofol-based total intravenous anesthesia on hemodynamics during anesthesia induction in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement: a randomized controlled trial.比较瑞马唑仑和依托咪酯全身静脉麻醉对行经导管主动脉瓣置换术患者麻醉诱导期间血流动力学的影响:一项随机对照试验。
J Anesth. 2024 Jun;38(3):330-338. doi: 10.1007/s00540-024-03311-x. Epub 2024 Feb 12.
10
Pharmacodynamic analysis of intravenous bolus remimazolam for loss of consciousness in patients undergoing general anaesthesia: a randomised, prospective, double-blind study.静脉注射咪达唑仑诱导全麻患者意识消失的药效学分析:一项随机、前瞻性、双盲研究。
Br J Anaesth. 2022 Jul;129(1):49-57. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2022.02.040. Epub 2022 May 11.

本文引用的文献

1
Efficacy of Single-Bolus Administration of Remimazolam During Induction of Anesthesia in Patients Undergoing Cardiac Surgery: A Prospective, Single-Center, Randomized Controlled Study.瑞马唑仑单次给药在心脏手术患者麻醉诱导中的疗效:一项前瞻性、单中心、随机对照研究。
Anesth Analg. 2024 Oct 1;139(4):770-780. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000006861. Epub 2024 Feb 5.
2
Propofol-induced myoclonus during maintenance of anaesthesia.麻醉维持期间丙泊酚诱发的肌阵挛。
Anaesth Rep. 2023 Nov 5;11(2):e12253. doi: 10.1002/anr3.12253. eCollection 2023 Jul-Dec.
3
The use of remimazolam propofol for induction and maintenance of general anesthesia: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
瑞米唑仑联合丙泊酚用于全身麻醉诱导和维持的系统评价与Meta分析。
Front Pharmacol. 2023 Feb 6;14:1101728. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2023.1101728. eCollection 2023.
4
Efficacy and Safety of Remimazolam Tosilate versus Propofol for General Anesthesia in Cirrhotic Patients Undergoing Endoscopic Variceal Ligation.甲苯磺酸瑞马唑仑与丙泊酚用于肝硬化患者内镜下静脉曲张结扎术全身麻醉的疗效与安全性比较
Int J Gen Med. 2022 Jan 13;15:583-591. doi: 10.2147/IJGM.S345390. eCollection 2022.
5
A systematic review of risk factors for postinduction hypotension in surgical patients undergoing general anesthesia.对接受全身麻醉的外科手术患者诱导后低血压危险因素的系统评价。
Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2021 Nov;25(22):7044-7050. doi: 10.26355/eurrev_202111_27255.
6
Effect of remimazolam induction on hemodynamics in patients undergoing valve replacement surgery: A randomized, double-blind, controlled trial.瑞马唑仑诱导对瓣膜置换术患者血流动力学的影响:一项随机、双盲、对照试验。
Pharmacol Res Perspect. 2021 Oct;9(5):e00851. doi: 10.1002/prp2.851.
7
Safety and efficacy of remimazolam compared with propofol in induction of general anesthesia.与丙泊酚相比,瑞米唑仑用于全身麻醉诱导的安全性和有效性。
Minerva Anestesiol. 2021 Oct;87(10):1073-1079. doi: 10.23736/S0375-9393.21.15517-8. Epub 2021 Jul 14.
8
Efficacy and safety of remimazolam versus propofol for general anesthesia: a multicenter, single-blind, randomized, parallel-group, phase IIb/III trial.瑞马唑仑与丙泊酚用于全身麻醉的有效性和安全性:一项多中心、单盲、随机、平行分组、Ⅱb/Ⅲ期临床试验。
J Anesth. 2020 Aug;34(4):543-553. doi: 10.1007/s00540-020-02788-6. Epub 2020 May 16.
9
Remimazolam besilate, a benzodiazepine, has been approved for general anesthesia!!苯磺酸瑞马唑仑,一种苯二氮䓬类药物,已被批准用于全身麻醉!!
J Anesth. 2020 Aug;34(4):479-482. doi: 10.1007/s00540-020-02755-1. Epub 2020 Mar 10.
10
Remimazolam: new beginnings or just a me-too?瑞米唑仑:新起点还是跟风之作?
Anesth Analg. 2012 Aug;115(2):217-9. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e31823acb95.

单次推注剂量与持续输注瑞马唑仑用于非心脏手术全身麻醉诱导的比较:一项单中心前瞻性随机对照试验。

Comparison between single bolus dose administration and continuous infusion of remimazolam for general anesthesia induction in non-cardiac surgery: a single-center prospective randomized controlled trial.

作者信息

Ikeda Tsuyoshi, Miyoshi Hirotsugu, Kido Kenshiro, Sumii Ayako, Otsuki Sachiko, Kato Takahiro, Nakamura Ryuji, Narasaki Soshi, Tsutsumi Yasuo M

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan.

Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Institution, Hiroshima University, 1-2-3 Kasumi, Minami-ku, Hiroshima, 734-8551, Japan.

出版信息

BMC Anesthesiol. 2025 Apr 2;25(1):150. doi: 10.1186/s12871-025-03032-y.

DOI:10.1186/s12871-025-03032-y
PMID:40175909
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11963264/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Remimazolam is a short-acting benzodiazepine anesthetic recommended for continuous infusion during anesthesia induction. However, the safety and efficacy of single bolus dose administration remain under investigation. This study compared continuous infusion with single bolus dose administration and assessed the safety of a single bolus dose administration.

METHODS

The participants were randomly assigned into three groups based on the method of remimazolam administration the day before surgery: (1) continuous infusion group (continuous infusion at 12 mg/kg/h), (2) single bolus dose administration of 0.1 group (single administration of 0.1 mg/kg), or (3) single bolus dose administration of 0.2 group (single administration of 0.2 mg/kg). The time between drug administration and loss of consciousness was determined, and hemodynamic monitoring was performed.

RESULTS

67 patients (continuous infusion group (n = 22), single bolus dose administration of 0.1 group (n = 22), and single bolus dose administration of 0.2 group (n = 23)) were included in the study. The different times to loss of consciousness were 88.2 ± 16.2 s, 59.5 ± 31.5 s, and 42.6 ± 11.4 s in the continuous infusion group, single bolus dose administration of 0.1 group, and single bolus dose administration of 0.2 group, respectively. No significant differences were observed in the incidence of adverse events between the groups. The results are presented as mean ± standard deviation (SD).

CONCLUSIONS

Single-dose remimazolam is a safe method for anesthesia induction, resulting in shorter time to loss of consciousness compared with continuous infusion, while maintaining a similar incidence of adverse events.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

jRCTs061230049, registered on 17/08/2023.

摘要

背景

瑞米唑仑是一种短效苯二氮䓬类麻醉剂,推荐在麻醉诱导期间持续输注。然而,单次推注给药的安全性和有效性仍在研究中。本研究比较了持续输注与单次推注给药,并评估了单次推注给药的安全性。

方法

根据手术前一天瑞米唑仑的给药方法,将参与者随机分为三组:(1)持续输注组(以12mg/kg/h持续输注),(2)0.1mg/kg单次推注给药组(单次给予0.1mg/kg),或(3)0.2mg/kg单次推注给药组(单次给予0.2mg/kg)。确定给药至意识消失的时间,并进行血流动力学监测。

结果

67例患者(持续输注组(n = 22)、0.1mg/kg单次推注给药组(n = 22)和0.2mg/kg单次推注给药组(n = 23))纳入研究。持续输注组、0.1mg/kg单次推注给药组和0.2mg/kg单次推注给药组意识消失的不同时间分别为88.2±16.2秒、59.5±31.5秒和42.6±11.4秒。各组间不良事件发生率未观察到显著差异。结果以平均值±标准差(SD)表示。

结论

单剂量瑞米唑仑是一种安全的麻醉诱导方法,与持续输注相比,意识消失时间更短,同时不良事件发生率相似。

试验注册

jRCTs061230049,于2023年8月17日注册。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7d26/11963264/7b966fc11934/12871_2025_3032_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7d26/11963264/d49a4939e4f8/12871_2025_3032_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7d26/11963264/e624fb3bed39/12871_2025_3032_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7d26/11963264/56d2aaadb273/12871_2025_3032_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7d26/11963264/ed73a62430f8/12871_2025_3032_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7d26/11963264/7b966fc11934/12871_2025_3032_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7d26/11963264/d49a4939e4f8/12871_2025_3032_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7d26/11963264/e624fb3bed39/12871_2025_3032_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7d26/11963264/56d2aaadb273/12871_2025_3032_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7d26/11963264/ed73a62430f8/12871_2025_3032_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7d26/11963264/7b966fc11934/12871_2025_3032_Fig5_HTML.jpg