• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在麻醉后护理单元实施卓越学习法:对医疗保健专业人员六个月后的经历进行的定性研究。

Implementing Learning from Excellence in a postanaesthesia care unit: a qualitative study of healthcare professionals' experiences after six months.

作者信息

Birkeli Gørill, Deilkås Ellen Catharina Tveter, Ballangrud Randi, Lindahl Anne Karin

机构信息

Division of Surgery, Akershus University Hospital, Sykehusveien 25, 1478, Lørenskog, Norway.

Department of Health Management and Health Economics, University of Oslo Faculty of Medicine, Institute of Health and Society, Forskningsveien 3A, 0373, Oslo, Norway.

出版信息

BMC Health Serv Res. 2025 Apr 2;25(1):493. doi: 10.1186/s12913-025-12626-8.

DOI:10.1186/s12913-025-12626-8
PMID:40176056
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11966875/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Prevailing efforts to ensure patient safety have primarily focused on learning from errors and adverse events (Safety-I). However, it is advocated that complex systems also learn from success (Safety-II) and focus on healthcare professionals' well-being at work to increase resilience. Learning from Excellence is a British initiative designed to learn from successful practices and provide positive feedback to the staff. It has gained enthusiastic followers in several countries, including Norway. However, how it influences learning, well-being and quality improvement, has not been studied in-depth. This study intends to address these gaps. Thus, this study aimed to describe healthcare professionals' experiences with Learning from Excellence six months after its implementation in a postanaesthesia care unit.

METHODS

A qualitative descriptive design was applied. Learning from Excellence was implemented in a postanaesthesia care unit of a Norwegian university hospital between November 2022 and May 2023. Six semi-structured focus group interviews were conducted, from May to June 2023, with a convenience sample of nurses (n = 17) and physicians (n = 7). The data were analysed through inductive reflexive thematic analysis. The study adhered to the COREQ guidelines.

RESULTS

This study reports four prominent themes encapsulating healthcare professionals' experiences with Learning from Excellence. These themes were termed as follows: 1) 'Facilitates a more positive working climate', including sub-themes 'Helps spread positive feedback' and 'Feeling seen and motivated'; 2) 'Why don't I get any 'likes'?'; 3) 'Organisational learning is challenging', including sub-themes 'Hesitating to report' and 'Provides mostly superficial learning'; and 4) 'Success inspires quality improvement project'.

CONCLUSIONS

Implementing LfE mostly contributed to a positive working climate in a postanaesthesia care unit. For LfE to be worth implementing, it is essential to improve organisational learning, while minimising the negative effects of LfE, such as exclusivity issues.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05794490; first registered on March 4, 2023.

摘要

背景

当前确保患者安全的努力主要集中于从错误和不良事件中学习(安全-Ⅰ)。然而,有人主张复杂系统也应从成功中学习(安全-Ⅱ),并关注医护人员的工作幸福感以增强恢复力。“从卓越中学习”是一项英国倡议,旨在从成功实践中学习并向员工提供积极反馈。它在包括挪威在内的几个国家赢得了热情的追随者。然而,其如何影响学习、幸福感和质量改进尚未得到深入研究。本研究旨在填补这些空白。因此,本研究旨在描述在麻醉后护理单元实施“从卓越中学习”六个月后医护人员的体验。

方法

采用定性描述性设计。2022年11月至2023年5月期间,在挪威一家大学医院的麻醉后护理单元实施了“从卓越中学习”。2023年5月至6月,对护士(n = 17)和医生(n = 7)的便利样本进行了六次半结构化焦点小组访谈。通过归纳反思性主题分析对数据进行分析。本研究遵循COREQ指南。

结果

本研究报告了四个突出主题,概括了医护人员对“从卓越中学习”的体验。这些主题如下:1)“营造更积极的工作氛围”,包括子主题“有助于传播积极反馈”和“感到被关注和有动力”;2)“为什么我没有得到任何‘赞’?”;3)“组织学习具有挑战性”,包括子主题“犹豫是否报告”和“大多提供表面学习”;4)“成功激发质量改进项目”。

结论

实施“从卓越中学习”在很大程度上有助于在麻醉后护理单元营造积极的工作氛围。为使“从卓越中学习”值得实施,必须改进组织学习,同时尽量减少其负面影响,如排他性问题。

试验注册

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05794490;于2023年3月4日首次注册。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c3a0/11966875/2a9ab1ecaaa4/12913_2025_12626_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c3a0/11966875/58b6d97e9085/12913_2025_12626_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c3a0/11966875/09f9644e775b/12913_2025_12626_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c3a0/11966875/2a9ab1ecaaa4/12913_2025_12626_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c3a0/11966875/58b6d97e9085/12913_2025_12626_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c3a0/11966875/09f9644e775b/12913_2025_12626_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c3a0/11966875/2a9ab1ecaaa4/12913_2025_12626_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Implementing Learning from Excellence in a postanaesthesia care unit: a qualitative study of healthcare professionals' experiences after six months.在麻醉后护理单元实施卓越学习法:对医疗保健专业人员六个月后的经历进行的定性研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2025 Apr 2;25(1):493. doi: 10.1186/s12913-025-12626-8.
2
Learning from patient safety incidents: The Green Cross method.从患者安全事件中学习:绿色十字方法。
Nurs Crit Care. 2025 Mar;30(2):e13114. doi: 10.1111/nicc.13114. Epub 2024 Jun 26.
3
Green Cross method in a postanaesthesia care unit: a qualitative study of the healthcare professionals' experiences after 3 years, including the COVID-19 pandemic period.格林克罗斯术后复苏单元法:COVID-19 大流行期间,3 年后医护人员经验的定性研究
BMJ Open Qual. 2023 May;12(2). doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2022-002247.
4
Assessment of older persons with multimorbidity in Norwegian primary care: a qualitative study of healthcare professionals' experiences and preferences in fostering continuity of care.挪威初级保健中患有多种疾病的老年人评估:一项关于医疗保健专业人员在促进连续性护理方面的经验和偏好的定性研究
BMC Health Serv Res. 2025 Jan 2;25(1):6. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-12185-4.
5
Hospital-to-Home Transitions for Lung Cancer Patients-A Qualitative Study of Healthcare Professionals' Experiences.肺癌患者从医院到家庭的过渡——对医护人员经历的定性研究
Nurs Open. 2025 Feb;12(2):e70143. doi: 10.1002/nop2.70143.
6
Health professionals' experience of teamwork education in acute hospital settings: a systematic review of qualitative literature.医疗专业人员在急症医院环境中团队合作教育的经验:对定性文献的系统综述
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):96-137. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-1843.
7
Longitudinal team training program in a Norwegian surgical ward: a qualitative study of nurses' and physicians' experiences with implementation.挪威外科病房纵向团队培训计划:对护士和医生实施经验的定性研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Jul 23;21(1):725. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-06732-6.
8
The postoperative handover: a focus group interview study with nurse anaesthetists, anaesthesiologists and PACU nurses.术后交接:对护士麻醉师、麻醉师和 PACU 护士的焦点小组访谈研究。
BMJ Open. 2017 Aug 4;7(8):e015038. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-015038.
9
Healthcare professionals' experience with nutritional care beyond formal quality systems - A qualitative study.医疗专业人员在正式质量体系之外的营养护理方面的经验 - 一项定性研究。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2024 Dec;160:104860. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2024.104860. Epub 2024 Oct 1.
10
Ambulance professionals' experiences of teamwork in the context of a team training programme - a qualitative study.救护车专业人员在团队培训计划背景下的团队合作体验——一项定性研究。
BMC Emerg Med. 2024 Jul 2;24(1):108. doi: 10.1186/s12873-024-01018-6.

本文引用的文献

1
Mixed method evaluation of a learning from excellence programme for community health workers in Neno, Malawi. Malawi 恩诺省社区卫生工作者卓越学习项目的混合方法评价。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Mar 19;24(1):355. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-10686-w.
2
Analyzing the concept of toxic positivity for nursing: A dimensional analysis approach.护理中“有毒的积极心态”概念分析:一种维度分析方法。
J Adv Nurs. 2024 Aug;80(8):3146-3157. doi: 10.1111/jan.16057. Epub 2024 Jan 19.
3
Learning does not just happen: establishing learning principles for tools to translate resilience into practice, based on a participatory approach.
学习并非自然而然发生的:基于参与式方法,为将弹性转化为实践的工具确立学习原则。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Jun 16;23(1):646. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-09653-8.
4
Green Cross method in a postanaesthesia care unit: a qualitative study of the healthcare professionals' experiences after 3 years, including the COVID-19 pandemic period.格林克罗斯术后复苏单元法:COVID-19 大流行期间,3 年后医护人员经验的定性研究
BMJ Open Qual. 2023 May;12(2). doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2022-002247.
5
Let's reconnect healthcare with its mission and purpose by bringing humanity to the point of care.让我们通过将人性融入医疗护理点,使医疗保健重新回归其使命和宗旨。
BMJ Lead. 2023 Apr 7;7(4). doi: 10.1136/leader-2023-000747.
6
Surgical team dynamics in a reflective team meeting to improve quality of care: qualitative analysis of a shared mental model.反思性团队会议中改善医疗质量的手术团队动态:共享心智模型的定性分析
Br J Surg. 2023 Sep 6;110(10):1271-1275. doi: 10.1093/bjs/znad111.
7
Taking a Resilience Engineering Approach to Perioperative Handoffs.采用弹性工程方法进行围手术期交接。
Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2023 Aug;49(8):431-434. doi: 10.1016/j.jcjq.2023.03.010. Epub 2023 Apr 5.
8
The association between patient safety culture and adverse events - a scoping review.患者安全文化与不良事件的关联——范围综述。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Mar 29;23(1):300. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-09332-8.
9
The Safety of Inpatient Health Care.住院患者医疗安全。
N Engl J Med. 2023 Jan 12;388(2):142-153. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa2206117.
10
Experience of learning from everyday work in daily safety huddles-a multi-method study.从日常安全班前会上的工作学习经验——一项多方法研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Aug 30;22(1):1101. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-08462-9.