Zhang Jingwen, Perret Jennifer L, Bui Dinh S, Alif Sheikh M, Abramson Michael J, Chang Anne B, Kromhout Hans, Hamilton Garun S, Thomas Paul S, Erbas Bircan, Thompson Bruce R, Matheson Melanie C, Walters E Haydn, Lodge Caroline J, Dharmage Shyamali C
Allergy and Lung Health Unit, Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Institute for Breathing and Sleep (IBAS), Victoria, Australia.
Respirology. 2025 Sep;30(9):840-850. doi: 10.1111/resp.70040. Epub 2025 Apr 2.
The evidence around occupation-related chronic cough is conflicting and current definitions of chronic cough cannot capture its heterogeneity. Using our recently characterised novel cough subclasses, we aimed to identify subclass-specific occupational risks.
Using data from the Tasmanian Longitudinal Health Study (TAHS), occupational exposures up to age 53 years were coded using the ALOHA+ Job Exposure Matrix, into ever-exposure (no, only-low, ever-high) and cumulative exposure. People belonging to six previously identified cough subclasses among 2213 current coughers at age 53 years were compared to non-coughers (n = 1396). Associations with occupational exposures were assessed using multinomial logistic regression for these cough subclasses and logistic regression for standard definitions (chronic cough, chronic phlegm, and chronic bronchitis) after adjusting for potential confounders.
Biological dust was associated with "cough with allergies" (cumulative: adjusted multinomial odds ratio [aMOR] = 1.06, 95% CI: 1.02-1.10, per 10 exposure-year increase). Aromatic solvents were associated with "chronic dry cough" (cumulative: aMOR = 1.15, 95% CI: 1.02-1.29). Other solvents were associated with "chronic productive cough" (ever-high: aMOR = 2.81, 95% CI: 1.26-6.2); "intermittent productive cough" (cumulative: aMOR = 1.06, 95% CI: 0.98-1.16), chronic bronchitis (ever-high: aOR = 2.48, 95% CI: 1.01-6.06); and chronic phlegm (ever-high: aOR = 2.26, 95% CI: 1.14-4.51). Herbicides (cumulative) were also associated with "intermittent productive cough" (aOR = 1.09, 95% CI: 1.00-1.77) and chronic phlegm (aOR = 1.07, 95% CI: 1.00-1.15).
Novel cough subclasses had distinct associations with specific occupational exposures, suggesting different pathophysiology. Aromatic solvents were associated with dry cough; biological dust with allergic cough; herbicides and other solvents with productive cough. Using novel cough subclasses was superior to standard definitions in uncovering these associations.
关于职业相关慢性咳嗽的证据相互矛盾,且目前慢性咳嗽的定义无法涵盖其异质性。我们利用最近确定的新型咳嗽亚类,旨在确定亚类特异性职业风险。
利用塔斯马尼亚纵向健康研究(TAHS)的数据,使用ALOHA+工作暴露矩阵将53岁之前的职业暴露编码为曾经暴露(否、仅低暴露、曾经高暴露)和累积暴露。将53岁时2213名现患咳嗽者中先前确定的六个咳嗽亚类的人与非咳嗽者(n = 1396)进行比较。在调整潜在混杂因素后,使用多项逻辑回归评估这些咳嗽亚类与职业暴露的关联,并使用逻辑回归评估标准定义(慢性咳嗽、慢性咳痰和慢性支气管炎)与职业暴露的关联。
生物性粉尘与“过敏性咳嗽”相关(累积暴露:调整后的多项比值比[aMOR]=1.06,95%置信区间:1.02 - 1.10,每增加10个暴露年)。芳香族溶剂与“慢性干咳”相关(累积暴露:aMOR = 1.15,95%置信区间:1.02 - 1.29)。其他溶剂与“慢性湿性咳嗽”相关(曾经高暴露:aMOR = 2.81,95%置信区间:1.26 - 6.2);“间歇性湿性咳嗽”(累积暴露:aMOR = 1.06,95%置信区间:0.98 - 1.16)、慢性支气管炎(曾经高暴露:调整后的比值比[aOR]=2.48,95%置信区间:1.01 - 6.06);以及慢性咳痰(曾经高暴露:aOR = 2.26,95%置信区间:1.14 - 4.51)。除草剂(累积暴露)也与“间歇性湿性咳嗽”(aOR = 1.09,95%置信区间:1.00 - 1.77)和慢性咳痰(aOR = 1.07,95%置信区间:1.00 - 1.15)相关。
新型咳嗽亚类与特定职业暴露有不同的关联,提示不同的病理生理学机制。芳香族溶剂与干咳相关;生物性粉尘与过敏性咳嗽相关;除草剂和其他溶剂与湿性咳嗽相关。在揭示这些关联方面,使用新型咳嗽亚类比标准定义更具优势。