Lai James M, Chen Justin, Fils Aaron J, Rohowetz Landon J, Herskowitz William, Durkee Heather, Rowaan Cornelis Jan, Gunawardene Araliya N, Patel Nimesh, Parel Jean-Marie, Yannuzzi Nicolas A
Bascom Palmer Eye Institute at the University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida.
Ophthalmic Biophysics Center, McKnight Vision Research Center, Miami, Florida.
Ophthalmol Sci. 2025 Jan 18;5(3):100714. doi: 10.1016/j.xops.2025.100714. eCollection 2025 May-Jun.
To investigate the mechanical properties of 23-, 25-, and 27-gauge trocars when subjected to representative pressures of posterior segment surgery.
Experimental study.
There were no subjects included in this study.
Twenty-four trocars each from Alcon, Dutch Ophthalmic Research Center (DORC), and Bausch & Lomb (B/L), distributed evenly across 23-, 25-, and 27-gauge sizes were included in this study. These trocars were tested at both 40 mmHg and 60 mmHg of pressure. Two failure end points were identified, and each trocar was tested until it reached both failure points.
The number of instrument exchanges required before trocar valve failure at 2 predesignated end points.
A total of 72 measurements were made. Most notably between brands, 23-gauge Alcon trocars demonstrated significantly greater competence than their 23-gauge counterparts in B/L and DORC at both 40 mmHg and 60 mmHg pressures ( 0.01). However, at the 25- and 27-gauge sizes, there were no significant differences in competence between trocar brands ( > 0.05).
Based on the findings of this study, 23-gauge valved trocars from B/L and DORC exhibited a significantly lower threshold for compromise compared to that of Alcon valved trocars, likely attributable to differences in valve placement design. Surgeon experience, vitrector preference, and the specific type of surgery performed are important considerations in the choice of vitrector gauge and brand.
Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.
研究23号、25号和27号套管针在承受后段手术代表性压力时的力学性能。
实验研究。
本研究未纳入研究对象。
本研究纳入了来自爱尔康(Alcon)、荷兰眼科研究中心(DORC)和博士伦(B/L)的各24根套管针,这些套管针均匀分布在23号、25号和27号规格中。这些套管针在40 mmHg和60 mmHg的压力下进行测试。确定了两个失效终点,每根套管针都进行测试,直到达到两个失效点。
在2个预先设定的终点处,套管针瓣膜失效前所需的器械更换次数。
共进行了72次测量。最显著的是,在不同品牌之间,23号爱尔康套管针在40 mmHg和60 mmHg压力下均表现出比博士伦和荷兰眼科研究中心的23号同类套管针显著更强的性能(P<0.01)。然而,在25号和27号规格中,不同品牌套管针在性能上没有显著差异(P>0.05)。
基于本研究结果,与爱尔康带瓣膜套管针相比,博士伦和荷兰眼科研究中心的23号带瓣膜套管针表现出明显更低的性能阈值,这可能归因于瓣膜放置设计的差异。外科医生的经验、玻璃体切割器的偏好以及所进行的具体手术类型是选择玻璃体切割器规格和品牌时的重要考虑因素。
本文末尾的脚注和披露中可能会有专有或商业披露信息。