Chen Siyu, Creswell Richard, Hounsell Rachel, Cantrell Liberty, Bajaj Sumali, Dahal Prabin, Tsui Lok Hei Joseph, Kolade Olumide, Amswych Ma'ayan, Naidoo Reshania, Fowler Tom, Hopkins Susan, Stepniewska Kasia, Voysey Merryn, White Lisa, Shretta Rima, Lambert Ben
Princeton University High Meadows Environmental Institute, Princeton, New Jersey, USA.
Department of Public and Ecosystem Health, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, USA.
BMJ Public Health. 2025 Mar 28;3(1):e001376. doi: 10.1136/bmjph-2024-001376. eCollection 2025 Jan.
We retrospectively evaluated the impact of COVID-19 testing among residents and staff in social care homes in England.
We obtained 80 million reported PCR and lateral flow device (LFD) test results, from 14 805 care homes (residents and staff) in England, conducted between October 2020 and March 2022. These testing data were then linked to care home characteristics, test costs and 24 500 COVID-19-related deaths of residents. We decomposed the mechanism of outbreak mitigation into outbreak discovery and outbreak control and used Poisson regressions to investigate how reported testing intensity was associated with the size of outbreak discovered and to uncover its association with outbreak control. We used negative binomial regressions to determine the factors influencing COVID-19-related deaths subsequent to outbreaks. We performed a cost-effectiveness analysis of the impact of testing on preventing COVID-19-related deaths of residents.
Reported testing intensity generally reflected changes in testing policy over time, although there was considerable heterogeneity among care homes. Client type was the strongest determinant of whether COVID-19-related deaths in residents occurred subsequent to testing positive. Higher staff-to-resident ratios were associated with larger outbreak sizes but rapid outbreak control and a decreased risk of COVID-19-related deaths. Assuming our regression estimates represent causal effects, care home testing in England was cost-effective at preventing COVID-19-related deaths among residents during the pandemic and approximately 3.5 times more cost-effective prior to the vaccine rollout.
PCR and LFD testing was likely an impactful intervention for detecting and controlling COVID-19 outbreaks in care homes in England and cost-effective for preventing COVID-19-related deaths among residents. In future pandemics, testing must be prioritised for care homes, especially if severe illness and death particularly affect older people or individuals with characteristics similar to care home residents, and an efficacious vaccine is unavailable.
我们回顾性评估了英格兰社会护理院中居民和工作人员进行新冠病毒检测的影响。
我们获取了2020年10月至2022年3月期间英格兰14805家护理院(居民和工作人员)报告的8000万份聚合酶链反应(PCR)和侧向流动检测装置(LFD)检测结果。然后将这些检测数据与护理院特征、检测成本以及24500例居民新冠病毒相关死亡病例相关联。我们将疫情缓解机制分解为疫情发现和疫情控制,并使用泊松回归来研究报告的检测强度与发现的疫情规模之间的关联,以及揭示其与疫情控制的关联。我们使用负二项回归来确定疫情爆发后影响新冠病毒相关死亡的因素。我们对检测对预防居民新冠病毒相关死亡的影响进行了成本效益分析。
报告的检测强度总体上反映了检测政策随时间的变化,尽管护理院之间存在相当大的异质性。客户类型是居民检测呈阳性后是否发生新冠病毒相关死亡的最强决定因素。较高的工作人员与居民比例与更大的疫情规模相关,但疫情控制迅速且新冠病毒相关死亡风险降低。假设我们的回归估计代表因果效应,在疫情期间,英格兰护理院检测在预防居民新冠病毒相关死亡方面具有成本效益,在疫苗推出之前,成本效益约高3.5倍。
PCR和LFD检测可能是英格兰护理院检测和控制新冠病毒疫情的一项有效干预措施,并且在预防居民新冠病毒相关死亡方面具有成本效益。在未来的大流行中,必须优先对护理院进行检测,特别是如果严重疾病和死亡对老年人或具有与护理院居民相似特征的个人影响尤为严重,且没有有效的疫苗。