Bi Xiaoyan, Ma Yankun, Sun Xianghong, Wu Jianhui, Wang Xiaoyu, Zhang Liang
State Key Laboratory of Cognitive Science and Mental Health, Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.
University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.
J Adolesc. 2025 Jul;97(5):1297-1313. doi: 10.1002/jad.12497. Epub 2025 Apr 3.
The Challenge and Hindrance Stress Framework is an influential theoretical model for measuring individuals' perceptions of stress. However, its structure has not been validated among Chinese adolescents, and the effects of different forms of stress on their short-term and long-term outcomes remain unclear.
Study 1 validated the Student Version Challenge and Hindrance Stress Scale with a sample of 3,376 adolescents in China (Time 1, September 2023, M = 14.57, SD = 1.46). Studies 2a and 2b extended Study 1 by analyzing cross-sectional and longitudinal data from 1,083 participants in China (Time 2, March 2024, M = 14.32, SD = 1.01) to examine the effects of various forms stress on academic performance and depression, with cognitive emotion regulation strategies used as mediators.
The results showed that adaptive strategies mediated the positive effects of challenge stress on academic performance and depression, whereas maladaptive strategies mediated the negative impacts of challenge or hindrance stress on depression.
These findings emphasize the importance of distinguishing stress forms, offering insights for educators, researchers, and policymakers to enhance adolescent well-being and performance.
挑战与阻碍压力框架是测量个体压力感知的一个有影响力的理论模型。然而,其结构在中国青少年中尚未得到验证,不同形式的压力对他们短期和长期结果的影响仍不明确。
研究1对中国3376名青少年样本(时间1,2023年9月,M = 14.57,SD = 1.46)验证了学生版挑战与阻碍压力量表。研究2a和2b扩展了研究1,通过分析来自中国1083名参与者(时间2,2024年3月,M = 14.32,SD = 1.01)的横断面和纵向数据,以考察各种形式的压力对学业成绩和抑郁的影响,将认知情绪调节策略用作中介变量。
结果表明,适应性策略介导了挑战压力对学业成绩和抑郁的积极影响,而适应不良策略介导了挑战或阻碍压力对抑郁的负面影响。
这些发现强调了区分压力形式的重要性,为教育工作者、研究人员和政策制定者提高青少年的幸福感和表现提供了见解。