Suppr超能文献

腹膜透析患者饮食钠限制问卷的有效性和可靠性

Validity and reliability of the Dietary Sodium Restriction Questionnaire in peritoneal dialysis patients.

作者信息

Lin Yunyao, Li Ruolin, Chen Zhihao, Xie Yingxin, Fang Junyan, Li Pu, Chu Mingzi, Liu Yingli

机构信息

Department of Nephrology, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2025 Apr 4;20(4):e0321177. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0321177. eCollection 2025.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The Chinese version of Dietary Sodium Restriction Questionnaire (DSRQ) was adapted to evaluate its reliability and validity for measuring adherence to a sodium-restricted diet in peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients.

METHODS

Specific items related to peritoneal dialysis were added to create a PD version of the DSRQ (PD-DSRQ), which was administered to 135 patients undergoing PD. Item analysis was performed using the critical ratio and homogeneity tests. The reliability of the questionnaire was determined by assessing the internal consistency. Content validity was evaluated using the expert evaluation method, and construct validity was assessed via exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses.

RESULTS

The item analysis revealed correlation coefficients (R-values) ranging from 0.311 to 0.745 for each item, with statistically significant differences between the high and low subgroups for all items. The Cronbach's α coefficients for the overall PD-DSRQ and the attitude, subjective norm, and perceived behavioral control subscales were 0.805, 0.892, 0.794, and 0.889, respectively. The item-level content validity index ranged from 0.83 to 1.00, and the scale-level content validity index/universal agreement was 0.9894. Exploratory factor analysis identified a three-factor structure consistent with the original DSRQ, except for Question 18. The three factors had eigenvalues of 5.302, 4.179, and 1.290, which explained 64.32% of the variance. The average variance extracted for each dimension was 0.5777, 0.5654, and 0.5259, and the composite reliability values were 0.8864, 0.7956, and 0.8802, respectively, demonstrating good convergent and discriminant validity.

CONCLUSION

The PD-DSRQ encompasses general information and three dimensions: attitude, subjective norms, and perceived behavioral control. The questionnaire demonstrated strong reliability and validity, making it a reliable tool for assessing adherence to sodium-restricted diets in patients undergoing PD.

摘要

目的

对中文版饮食钠限制问卷(DSRQ)进行改编,以评估其在测量腹膜透析(PD)患者钠限制饮食依从性方面的信效度。

方法

添加与腹膜透析相关的特定条目,创建DSRQ的PD版本(PD-DSRQ),并将其应用于135例接受PD治疗的患者。采用临界比和同质性检验进行条目分析。通过评估内部一致性来确定问卷的信度。采用专家评估法评估内容效度,并通过探索性和验证性因素分析评估结构效度。

结果

条目分析显示各条目的相关系数(R值)在0.311至0.745之间,所有条目的高低分组间差异均有统计学意义。PD-DSRQ总分及态度、主观规范和感知行为控制分量表的Cronbach's α系数分别为0.805、0.892、0.794和0.889。条目水平的内容效度指数在0.83至1.00之间,量表水平的内容效度指数/普遍认同度为0.9894。探索性因素分析确定了一个与原始DSRQ一致的三因素结构,但问题18除外。这三个因素的特征值分别为5.302、4.179和1.290,解释了64.32%的方差。各维度提取的平均方差分别为0.5777、0.5654和0.5259,组合信度值分别为0.8864、0.7956和0.8802,显示出良好的聚合效度和区分效度。

结论

PD-DSRQ包含一般信息以及态度、主观规范和感知行为控制三个维度。该问卷具有较强的信效度,是评估PD患者钠限制饮食依从性的可靠工具。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b149/11970638/03a8008b4b54/pone.0321177.g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验