Glassbrook Daniel J, Williams Lewis D, McShane Kevin J
Newcastle Falcons Rugby Football Club, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom.
Wolfson Research Institute for Health and Wellbeing, Durham University, Durham, United Kingdom.
PLoS One. 2025 Apr 4;20(4):e0320286. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0320286. eCollection 2025.
To quantify peak running intensity in professional rugby union across position groups, and peak running intensity differences between bout types (i.e., whole, starter, substitute).
Longitudinal study.
Global positioning systems were used to assess the activity of 36 professional rugby union players. A moving average approach was used to identify the 1- to 10-minute peak intensity period distances, and time spent above 80% and 90% of individual 1-minute match peak. Differences between position groups and bout type were determined by magnitude-based inferences.
All position groups showed most likely moderate to most likely large differences in peak intensity periods, except for tight 5 vs. backrow (possibly trivial small and possibly small), and half-backs vs. outside backs (very likely trivial small to likely trivial small). No position group comparison for time spent above 80% and 90% of 1-minute match peak resulted in moderate or greater differences. Possibly moderate to most likely moderate difference were observed between forwards whole vs. forward substitutes in 2- to 10-minute peak periods; most likely moderate differences were observed between forwards starters vs. forward substitutes in 10-minute peak intensity period; and most likely moderate differences were observed between backs whole vs. backs substitutes in the 1-minute peak intensity period. For time spent above 80% and 90% of 1-minute match peak all bout type comparisons resulted in most likely moderate to most likely large differences.
There are meaningful differences between position groups in peak running intensity in professional rugby union, and substitute players perform lower peak intensity running than whole or starters.
量化职业英式橄榄球联盟中不同位置组的最高跑步强度,以及不同比赛类型(即全场、首发、替补)之间的最高跑步强度差异。
纵向研究。
使用全球定位系统评估36名职业英式橄榄球联盟球员的活动情况。采用移动平均法确定1至10分钟的最高强度时段距离,以及高于个人1分钟比赛最高强度80%和90%的时间。位置组和比赛类型之间的差异通过基于量级的推断来确定。
所有位置组在最高强度时段显示出很可能为中等至很可能为较大的差异,但前排球员与后排球员之间除外(可能差异极小和可能差异小),以及半场球员与边锋之间除外(很可能差异极小至可能差异极小)。在高于1分钟比赛最高强度80%和90%的时间方面,没有位置组比较显示出中等或更大的差异。在2至10分钟的最高强度时段,前锋全场与前锋替补之间观察到可能为中等至很可能为中等的差异;在10分钟的最高强度时段,前锋首发与前锋替补之间观察到很可能为中等的差异;在1分钟的最高强度时段,后卫全场与后卫替补之间观察到很可能为中等的差异。对于高于1分钟比赛最高强度80%和90%的时间,所有比赛类型的比较都显示出很可能为中等至很可能为较大的差异。
职业英式橄榄球联盟中不同位置组在最高跑步强度方面存在有意义的差异,替补球员的最高强度跑步表现低于全场或首发球员。