Wen Jimmy, Syed Burhaan, Nadora Denise, How-Volkman Christiane, Bernstein Ethan, Truong Alina, Akhtar Muzammil, Razick Adam, Puglisi Jose, Frezza Eldo
California Northstate University College of Medicine, Elk Grove, California, USA.
University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Endocrinol Diabetes Metab. 2025 May;8(3):e70045. doi: 10.1002/edm2.70045.
Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) have emerged as an efficacious treatment for type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and have demonstrated substantial weight loss effects. This systematic review compares two prevalent GLP-1RAs, tirzepatide and semaglutide, with their weight loss effects and rates of adverse events (AEs).
Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA), a systematic search was performed in PubMed, Embase and Cochrane Library for direct comparative studies between tirzepatide and semaglutide. A meta-analysis was conducted via a random-effects model to analyse the differences in weight loss outcomes between study cohorts.
Four studies, with 28,827 patients (14,870 tirzepatide/13,928 semaglutide), mean age of 55.7 years (52.0 to 63.7) and mean follow-up of 35.9 weeks (23.6 to 44.6), were included in this study. Mean weight change across four studies for tirzepatide and semaglutide was -11.4% (-15.3% to -8.27%) and -7.3% (-8.3% to -6.08%), respectively. The meta-analysis supports these findings with a mean difference of -4.84 kg (95% CI: -6.21 to -3.47), favouring tirzepatide. The most common AEs were minor and moderate-severity gastrointestinal (GI) AEs.
Current literature supports tirzepatide demonstrating a higher impact on weight loss than semaglutide, with both demonstrating high rates of minimal- to moderate-severity AEs. Further research with comparative head-to-head trials will better elucidate these weight loss effects and safety profiles.
胰高血糖素样肽-1受体激动剂(GLP-1RAs)已成为治疗2型糖尿病(T2DM)的有效药物,并已显示出显著的减肥效果。本系统评价比较了两种常用的GLP-1RAs,替尔泊肽和司美格鲁肽,及其减肥效果和不良事件(AE)发生率。
按照系统评价和Meta分析的首选报告项目(PRISMA),在PubMed、Embase和Cochrane图书馆中进行了系统检索,以查找替尔泊肽和司美格鲁肽之间的直接比较研究。通过随机效应模型进行Meta分析,以分析研究队列之间减肥结果的差异。
本研究纳入了4项研究,共28827例患者(替尔泊肽组14870例/司美格鲁肽组13928例),平均年龄55.7岁(范围52.0至63.7岁),平均随访35.9周(范围23.6至44.6周)。四项研究中替尔泊肽和司美格鲁肽的平均体重变化分别为-11.4%(-15.3%至-8.27%)和-7.3%(-8.3%至-6.08%)。Meta分析支持了这些结果,平均差异为-4.84kg(95%CI:-6.21至-3.47),替尔泊肽更具优势。最常见的AE为轻度至中度严重程度的胃肠道(GI)AE。
目前的文献支持替尔泊肽在减肥方面比司美格鲁肽具有更高的效果,两者均显示出轻度至中度严重程度AE的高发生率。进一步进行比较性的头对头试验研究将更好地阐明这些减肥效果和安全性概况。