Costello Luke, Fazzini Brigitta
Intensive Care Medicine, St Bartholomew Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom; William Harvey Research Institute, Barts and The London School of Medicine & Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, United Kingdom.
William Harvey Research Institute, Barts and The London School of Medicine & Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, United Kingdom; Intensive Care Medicine, Royal London Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom.
Intensive Crit Care Nurs. 2025 Aug;89:104014. doi: 10.1016/j.iccn.2025.104014. Epub 2025 Apr 4.
Care of the dying is at the forefront in intensive care unit (ICU); however there is persistent debate surrounding clinicians' interventions to aid the dying process and make this more bearable and compassionate for patients. Since the expansion of assisted dying internationally, it is unclear how common this occurs within critical care. This work aims to evaluate the knowledge, attitudes and international practices of ICU clinicians about assisted dying.
Systematic literature search of PubMed, Embase and CINAHL including articles discussing the knowledge or attitudes towards and/or practices of assisted dying in ICU. The preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Review guidelines were followed. Records were included from 2002 as the year when assisted dying was first legalised in Belgium and by healthcare professionals. A qualitative data synthesis approach was used.
17 studies were eligible and included in the qualitative analysis. Knowledge of assisted dying was rarely assessed directly in the data, though self-reported knowledge was low apart from in one Canadian survey of ICU physicians. Abilities to define modalities of assisted dying were low across all studies where it was measured. Attitudes were highly variable, ranging from 23.6% to 76.5% in support of assisted dying, though clinicians' answers were inconsistent within and between studies. Actual practices of assisted dying in ICU were rarely measured or discussed, despite evidence of assisted dying in Canada and The Netherlands. Outside of legal pathways, there is also evidence of covert interventions either via non-framework approaches where it is otherwise legal or in countries where there is no supportive legislation.
ICU clinicians have heterogeneous knowledge and attitudes towards assisted dying, and overall familiarity remains low. The relevance of assisted dying to the ICU setting remains controversial, and its incidence is unclear.
Evaluating the attitudes and experiences of ICU clinicians about assisted dying is important to gain insight about clinical practices. This holistic viewpoint is key to develop management strategies focused on humanisation of care for patients and families while understanding how to support multidisciplinary clinicians in critical care so they can provide safe and respectful interventions. The identification of its incidence in legal and illegal frameworks and knowledge gaps is key when developing further research and planning tailored interventions.
临终关怀是重症监护病房(ICU)的首要任务;然而,围绕临床医生为协助临终过程并使其对患者而言更可承受且更具同情心而采取的干预措施,一直存在争议。自国际上协助死亡的范围扩大以来,目前尚不清楚在重症监护中这种情况有多普遍。这项工作旨在评估ICU临床医生关于协助死亡的知识、态度和国际实践。
对PubMed、Embase和CINAHL进行系统文献检索,包括讨论对ICU中协助死亡的知识、态度和/或实践的文章。遵循系统评价和Meta分析扩展版的首选报告项目用于范围综述指南。纳入2002年以来的记录,因为这一年协助死亡在比利时首次合法化并由医疗专业人员实施。采用定性数据综合方法。
17项研究符合条件并纳入定性分析。数据中很少直接评估对协助死亡的知识,不过除了一项针对加拿大ICU医生的调查外,自我报告的知识水平较低。在所有进行测量的研究中,界定协助死亡方式的能力都很低。态度差异很大,支持协助死亡的比例从23.6%到76.5%不等,不过临床医生在研究内部和研究之间的回答并不一致。尽管在加拿大和荷兰有协助死亡的证据,但很少对ICU中协助死亡的实际做法进行测量或讨论。在法律途径之外,也有证据表明存在通过非框架方法进行的秘密干预,这些方法在其他情况下是合法的,或者在没有支持性立法的国家也是如此。
ICU临床医生对协助死亡的知识和态度各不相同,总体熟悉程度仍然较低。协助死亡与ICU环境的相关性仍然存在争议,其发生率也不清楚。
评估ICU临床医生对协助死亡的态度和经验对于了解临床实践很重要。这种整体观点对于制定以患者和家属关怀人性化为重点的管理策略至关重要,同时要理解如何支持重症监护中的多学科临床医生,以便他们能够提供安全且尊重的干预措施。在开展进一步研究和规划针对性干预措施时,确定其在合法和非法框架中的发生率以及知识差距是关键。