Duncan Dock H, Forschack Norman, van Moorselaar Dirk, Müller Matthias M, Theeuwes Jan
Department of Experimental and Applied Psychology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Institute for Brain and Behavior Amsterdam (iBBA), 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
J Neurosci. 2025 May 21;45(21):e1973242025. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1973-24.2025.
Through experience, humans can learn to suppress locations that frequently contain distracting stimuli. However, the neural mechanism underlying learned suppression remains largely unknown. In this study, we combined steady-state visually evoked potentials (SSVEPs) with event-related potentials (ERPs) to investigate the mechanism behind statistically learned spatial suppression. Twenty-four male and female human participants performed a version of the additional singleton search task in which one location contained a distractor stimulus frequently. The search stimuli constantly flickered on-and-off the screen, resulting in steady-state entrainment. Prior to search onset, no differences in the SSVEP response were found, though a post hoc analysis did reveal proactive alpha lateralization. Following search onset, clear evoked differences in both the SSVEP and ERP signals emerged at the suppressed location relative to all other locations. Crucially, the early timing of these evoked modulations suggests that learned distractor suppression occurs at the initial stages of visual processing.
通过经验,人类可以学会抑制那些经常包含干扰性刺激的位置。然而,习得性抑制背后的神经机制在很大程度上仍然未知。在本研究中,我们将稳态视觉诱发电位(SSVEPs)与事件相关电位(ERPs)相结合,以研究统计学习的空间抑制背后的机制。24名男性和女性人类参与者执行了一个版本的额外单例搜索任务,其中一个位置经常包含一个干扰刺激。搜索刺激在屏幕上不断闪烁开和关,导致稳态同步。在搜索开始之前,未发现SSVEP反应有差异,尽管事后分析确实揭示了主动的阿尔法侧化。搜索开始后,相对于所有其他位置,在被抑制位置的SSVEP和ERP信号中都出现了明显的诱发差异。至关重要的是,这些诱发调制的早期时间表明,习得的干扰抑制发生在视觉处理的初始阶段。