Shaukat Haroon, Berkowitz Deena, Koutroulis Ioannis, Willner Emily
Department of Emergency Medicine, Children's National Medical Center, Washington, DC, USA.
Department of Pediatrics, George Washington University School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Washington, DC, USA.
Med Educ Online. 2025 Dec;30(1):2485503. doi: 10.1080/10872981.2025.2485503. Epub 2025 Apr 4.
The Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) defined 6 core competencies (medical knowledge, patient care, practice-based learning and improvement, systems-based practice, interpersonal and communication skills, and professionalism) to be used as a framework for outcomes-based assessment. Concurrent to the development of specialty-specific competencies and milestones, the concept of entrustable professional activities (EPAs) were introduced. EPAs describe what a learner can do at each of the 5 levels of entrustment. There are four pediatric acute and urgent and urgent care (PAC) fellowships to date, however, no curricular consensus exists. This article seeks to develop a set of nationally agreed-upon PAC-specific EPAs to be used by emerging fellowships.
Multi-step iterative qualitative study using a web-based survey was used for EPA development and validity. A modified-Delphi panel, comprised of pediatric educators from multiple institutions, participated in four rounds to reach consensus (≥80%). EPAs were ranked using a 5 point-Likert scale, then from most important to least important in series, and finally individually as yes/no for each EPAs inclusion.
Survey response rate was 83% (19/23). Six of the 7 EPAs were deemed on average to be high priority or essential. There was clear consensus on four EPAs and less agreement amongst the other three. Ultimately, 3 of the 7 EPAs reached consensus for inclusion, with agreement ranging from 84% to 100%.
CONCLUSION(S): PAC-specific EPAs focusing on clinical excellence, procedural competence, and high-quality care were all deemed essential components for PAC fellowships. Delineation of these EPAs will be critical to guide development of fellowship curricula.
毕业后医学教育认证委员会(ACGME)定义了6项核心能力(医学知识、患者护理、基于实践的学习与改进、基于系统的实践、人际沟通技能和职业素养),作为基于结果评估的框架。在制定特定专业能力和里程碑的同时,引入了可托付专业活动(EPA)的概念。EPA描述了学习者在5个托付级别上各自能够做什么。截至目前,有4个儿科急性和紧急护理(PAC) fellowship项目,但尚未形成课程共识。本文旨在制定一套全国公认的特定于PAC的EPA,供新兴的fellowship项目使用。
采用基于网络调查的多步骤迭代定性研究来进行EPA的开发和有效性评估。一个由来自多个机构的儿科教育工作者组成的改良德尔菲小组参与了四轮讨论以达成共识(≥80%)。EPA使用5点李克特量表进行排名,然后按重要性从高到低排序,最后对每个EPA的纳入与否单独以是/否进行评定。
调查回复率为83%(19/23)。7项EPA中有6项平均被认为是高优先级或必不可少的。4项EPA达成了明确共识,其他3项的共识较少。最终,7项EPA中有3项达成了纳入共识,同意率在84%至100%之间。
专注于临床卓越、操作能力和高质量护理的特定于PAC的EPA均被视为PAC fellowship项目的重要组成部分。明确这些EPA对于指导fellowship课程的开发至关重要。