Timbrell Lucy, Clark James, Linares-Matás Gonzalo, Boisard Solène, Arous Eslem Ben, Blinkhorn James, Grove Matt, Scerri Eleanor M L
Human Palaeosystems Group, Max Planck Institute of Geoanthropology, Jena, Germany.
Department of Archaeology, Classics and Egyptology, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Sci Rep. 2025 Apr 4;15(1):11645. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-95573-y.
Regionalisation is considered to be a hallmark of the Middle Stone Age (MSA) compared to the Early Stone Age. Yet what drove diversification around a shared technological substrate that persisted across Africa for hundreds of thousands of years remains debated. Non-mutually exclusive hypotheses include region-specific styles in manufacture, social signalling, cultural drift between geographically isolated populations, and diverse environmental adaptations, as well as the impacts of unequal research histories and intensities. We explore the potential ecological bases of behavioural diversity during the MSA between two well-studied and diverse areas: eastern and northwestern Africa. We utilise a set of standardised bioclimatic simulations, as well as a time series decomposition algorithm, to determine the nature and extent of regional differences in terms of environmental productivity, seasonality and predictability at MSA sites through time. Our results highlight that, compared to human occupations of eastern Africa, northwestern African MSA occupations are associated with colder, drier and less productive environments, albeit colder, but wetter and more productive compared to surrounding areas, with higher temperature seasonality and more predictable climates across millennia. We then theoretically consider the implications of our results for technological diversification between these two regions during the Middle to Late Pleistocene, such as for the investment in specific risk mitigation strategies for dealing with seasonally mobile resources in northern localities, and the diversification of MSA toolkits in tropical eastern Africa.
与旧石器时代早期相比,区域化被认为是中石器时代(MSA)的一个标志。然而,是什么推动了在整个非洲持续了数十万年的共享技术基础上的多样化,这一点仍存在争议。并非相互排斥的假设包括制造方面的区域特定风格、社会信号传递、地理上孤立的人群之间的文化漂移、多样的环境适应,以及不平等的研究历史和强度的影响。我们探索了在两个经过充分研究且多样化的地区——东非和西北非——的中石器时代行为多样性的潜在生态基础。我们利用一组标准化的生物气候模拟以及时间序列分解算法,来确定中石器时代遗址在不同时期环境生产力、季节性和可预测性方面区域差异的性质和程度。我们的结果表明,与东非的人类活动相比,西北非的中石器时代活动与更寒冷、干燥且生产力较低的环境相关,尽管与周边地区相比更寒冷但更湿润且生产力更高,在数千年间具有更高的温度季节性和更可预测的气候。然后,我们从理论上考虑了我们的结果对中更新世晚期至晚更新世这两个地区技术多样化的影响,例如在北方地区应对季节性流动资源的特定风险缓解策略的投资,以及热带东非中石器时代工具包的多样化。