Suppr超能文献

我们之中无人(参与):政治领域精英的过度代表削弱了政治信任。

(Not) one of us: The overrepresentation of elites in politics erodes political trust.

作者信息

Kesberg Rebekka, Easterbrook Matthew J

机构信息

University of Sussex, Brighton, UK.

University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam.

出版信息

Br J Soc Psychol. 2025 Apr;64(2):e12885. doi: 10.1111/bjso.12885.

Abstract

Citizens in democracies are increasingly dissatisfied with democratic governance, distrustful of elected officials and view politicians as aloof and detached. We argue that this is, in part, due to the overrepresentation of elites in political office. We conducted four studies (N = 2009) in the U.K. focusing on the education sector. That is, we explore the impact of the overrepresentation of privately educated individuals-who represent >7% of the population but 30%-70% of the political cabinet-on political trust. Studies 1a and 1b measured perceptions and stereotypes of politicians, and Studies 2-4 manipulated the proportion of privately educated politicians in political institutions. Results show that trust in political institutions is eroded when there is overrepresentation of those educated in the private sector. We explore boundary conditions showing that effects are stronger for those who question meritocratic principles in the educational sector and that the effect is mediated through perceptions of deservingness.

摘要

民主国家的公民对民主治理越来越不满,对当选官员不信任,认为政治家冷漠且脱离群众。我们认为,这在一定程度上是由于精英在政治职位中所占比例过高。我们在英国进行了四项研究(N = 2009),重点关注教育部门。也就是说,我们探讨了接受私立教育的个人(占人口比例超过7%,但在政治内阁中占30%-70%)比例过高对政治信任的影响。研究1a和1b测量了对政治家的看法和刻板印象,研究2至4则操纵了政治机构中接受私立教育的政治家的比例。结果表明,当私立教育背景的人比例过高时,对政治机构的信任就会受到侵蚀。我们探讨了边界条件,表明对于那些质疑教育部门精英主义原则的人来说,影响更强,而且这种影响是通过应得感的认知来介导的。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f2df/11971726/9db1ffaf7de7/BJSO-64-0-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
(Not) one of us: The overrepresentation of elites in politics erodes political trust.
Br J Soc Psychol. 2025 Apr;64(2):e12885. doi: 10.1111/bjso.12885.
3
A leader I can(not) trust: understanding the path from epistemic trust to political leader choices via dogmatism.
Politics Life Sci. 2025;44(1):88-107. doi: 10.1017/pls.2024.11. Epub 2024 Oct 31.
4
Gender differences in personal values of national and local Italian politicians, activists and voters.
Int J Psychol. 2017 Oct;52(5):406-414. doi: 10.1002/ijop.12236. Epub 2015 Nov 27.
5
A revolt of the deplored? The role of perceived cultural distance in the educational gradient in anti-establishment politics.
Br J Sociol. 2021 Dec;72(5):1448-1463. doi: 10.1111/1468-4446.12892. Epub 2021 Sep 6.
6
Political attitudes bias the mental representation of a presidential candidate's face.
Psychol Sci. 2014 Feb;25(2):503-10. doi: 10.1177/0956797613510717. Epub 2013 Dec 23.
7
Determinants of political trust: a lifetime learning model.
Dev Psychol. 2011 May;47(3):619-31. doi: 10.1037/a0021817.
9
Political probity increases trust in government: Evidence from randomized survey experiments.
PLoS One. 2020 Feb 24;15(2):e0225818. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0225818. eCollection 2020.
10
The weight of office? A scoping review of mental health issues and risk factors in elected politicians across democratic societies.
Int J Soc Psychiatry. 2025 Mar;71(2):223-238. doi: 10.1177/00207640241291523. Epub 2024 Nov 13.

本文引用的文献

1
Belief in School Meritocracy and the Legitimization of Social and Income Inequality.
Soc Psychol Personal Sci. 2023 Jun;14(5):621-635. doi: 10.1177/19485506221111017. Epub 2022 Aug 17.
2
Studying Socioeconomic Status: Conceptual Problems and an Alternative Path Forward.
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2023 Mar;18(2):275-292. doi: 10.1177/17456916221093615. Epub 2022 Aug 18.
3
Differentiating Between Belief-Indicative and Status-Indicative Groups Improves Predictions of Intergroup Attitudes.
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2023 Jul;49(7):1097-1112. doi: 10.1177/01461672221092852. Epub 2022 May 20.
4
When and Why People Prefer Higher Educated Politicians: Ingroup Bias, Deference, and Resistance.
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2023 Apr;49(4):585-599. doi: 10.1177/01461672221077794. Epub 2022 Feb 22.
6
"Our Country Needs a Strong Leader Right Now": Economic Inequality Enhances the Wish for a Strong Leader.
Psychol Sci. 2019 Nov;30(11):1625-1637. doi: 10.1177/0956797619875472. Epub 2019 Sep 30.
7
Socioeconomic status and the structure of the self-concept.
Br J Soc Psychol. 2020 Jan;59(1):66-86. doi: 10.1111/bjso.12334. Epub 2019 Jun 7.
8
The psychology of social class: How socioeconomic status impacts thought, feelings, and behaviour.
Br J Soc Psychol. 2018 Apr;57(2):267-291. doi: 10.1111/bjso.12251. Epub 2018 Feb 28.
9
How social-class stereotypes maintain inequality.
Curr Opin Psychol. 2017 Dec;18:43-48. doi: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2017.07.033. Epub 2017 Aug 4.
10
'Where there is a will, there is a way': Belief in school meritocracy and the social-class achievement gap.
Br J Soc Psychol. 2018 Jan;57(1):250-262. doi: 10.1111/bjso.12214. Epub 2017 Sep 11.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验