Suppr超能文献

激光或冷冻疗法治疗宫颈上皮内瘤变:一项比较疗效和副作用的随机研究。

Laser or cryotherapy for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: a randomized study to compare efficacy and side effects.

作者信息

Kwikkel H J, Helmerhorst T J, Bezemer P D, Quaak M J, Stolk J G

出版信息

Gynecol Oncol. 1985 Sep;22(1):23-31. doi: 10.1016/0090-8258(85)90003-4.

Abstract

A randomized study was performed to compare efficacy and side effects of laser and cryotherapy: 51 patients were treated with laser vaporization and 50 patients with cryotherapy. Success rates for laser and cryotherapy were not significantly different. Success rates were significantly related to lesion size. Grade of CIN, positive endocervical curettage, parity, and age at treatment were not found to be related. Vaginal discharge, both in duration and amount, was significantly less in patients treated with laser vaporization, compared with cryotherapy, but pain and bleeding occurred more often in patients treated with laser vaporization. A brief review of possible sources of bias in comparative studies on laser and cryotherapy is given, indicating the preference for a randomized study. It is concluded that widespread introduction of laser facilities in smaller centers is not justified, because the success rates are not better than those of cryotherapy, and because the advantages of less discharge are outweighed by the high cost.

摘要

进行了一项随机研究以比较激光治疗和冷冻治疗的疗效及副作用

51例患者接受激光汽化治疗,50例患者接受冷冻治疗。激光治疗和冷冻治疗的成功率无显著差异。成功率与病变大小显著相关。未发现CIN分级、宫颈管刮术阳性、产次及治疗年龄与之相关。与冷冻治疗相比,接受激光汽化治疗的患者阴道分泌物的持续时间和量均显著减少,但激光汽化治疗的患者疼痛和出血更常发生。对激光治疗和冷冻治疗比较研究中可能的偏倚来源进行了简要回顾,表明倾向于进行随机研究。得出结论,在较小的中心广泛引入激光设备是不合理的,因为成功率并不优于冷冻治疗,且分泌物较少的优势被高成本所抵消。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验