• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

早期职业研究人员与导师之间联合同行评审的价值。

The value of joint peer review between early career researchers and supervisors.

作者信息

Macarelli Viviana, Merkle Florian T

机构信息

Institute of Metabolic Science, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, UK.

Institute of Metabolic Science, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, UK; Cambridge Stem Cell Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 0AW, UK; Department of Pharmacology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 1QR, UK.

出版信息

Trends Cell Biol. 2025 May;35(5):353-356. doi: 10.1016/j.tcb.2025.03.002. Epub 2025 Apr 3.

DOI:10.1016/j.tcb.2025.03.002
PMID:40189947
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7617740/
Abstract

Peer review is essential for maintaining the quality of published research, but this skill is often not explicitly taught to early career researchers (ECRs). Joint peer review with supervisors can both promote ECR professional growth and enhance review quality. We describe the advantages and best practices of joint peer review.

摘要

同行评审对于维持已发表研究的质量至关重要,但早期职业研究人员(ECR)往往并未明确接受过这项技能的培训。与导师共同进行同行评审既能促进ECR的职业发展,又能提高评审质量。我们阐述了共同同行评审的优势和最佳实践。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cdc9/7617740/760a44ea6977/EMS205670-f001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cdc9/7617740/760a44ea6977/EMS205670-f001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cdc9/7617740/760a44ea6977/EMS205670-f001.jpg

相似文献

1
The value of joint peer review between early career researchers and supervisors.早期职业研究人员与导师之间联合同行评审的价值。
Trends Cell Biol. 2025 May;35(5):353-356. doi: 10.1016/j.tcb.2025.03.002. Epub 2025 Apr 3.
2
How to write an effective journal peer review using a staged writing approach: a best-practice guide for early-career researchers.如何使用分阶段写作方法撰写有效的期刊同行评审:面向初出茅庐的研究人员的最佳实践指南。
Int J Epidemiol. 2024 Oct 13;53(6). doi: 10.1093/ije/dyae154.
3
Reviewing manuscripts for scientific journals: recommendations for early career scientists.为科学期刊审阅稿件:给早期职业科学家的建议。
BMC Res Notes. 2025 Jan 16;18(1):17. doi: 10.1186/s13104-024-07060-8.
4
Open peer review, pros and cons from the perspective of an early career researcher.开放同行评审:从早期职业研究人员的角度看利弊。
mBio. 2023 Oct 31;14(5):e0194823. doi: 10.1128/mbio.01948-23. Epub 2023 Oct 9.
5
The pandemic and changes in early career researchers' career prospects, research and publishing practices.大流行与早期职业研究人员职业前景、研究和出版实践的变化。
PLoS One. 2023 Feb 15;18(2):e0281058. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0281058. eCollection 2023.
6
Accuracy in detecting inadequate research reporting by early career peer reviewers using an online CONSORT-based peer-review tool (COBPeer) versus the usual peer-review process: a cross-sectional diagnostic study.使用基于 CONSORT 的在线同行评审工具 (COBPeer) 与常规同行评审流程相比,早期职业同行评审员在检测研究报告不充分方面的准确性:一项横断面诊断研究。
BMC Med. 2019 Nov 19;17(1):205. doi: 10.1186/s12916-019-1436-0.
7
Ponderings on peer review. Part 2. Manuscript critiques.对同行评议的思考。第 2 部分。稿件评价。
Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol. 2023 Oct 1;325(4):R309-R326. doi: 10.1152/ajpregu.00112.2023. Epub 2023 Jul 31.
8
Co-reviewing and ghostwriting by early-career researchers in the peer review of manuscripts.投稿同行评审中早期职业研究人员的共同评审和代写行为。
Elife. 2019 Oct 31;8:e48425. doi: 10.7554/eLife.48425.
9
The inaugural Junior Editorial Board-lessons learned and the path forward toward improving the peer review process.首届无青年编委会——经验教训及改进同行评审过程的途径。
mBio. 2024 Jan 16;15(1):e0199123. doi: 10.1128/mbio.01991-23. Epub 2023 Dec 15.
10
On the value of preprints: An early career researcher perspective.预印本的价值:一位早期职业研究者的视角。
PLoS Biol. 2019 Feb 21;17(2):e3000151. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3000151. eCollection 2019 Feb.

本文引用的文献

1
The Benefits of Being a "Peer-Reviewer".成为“同行评审员”的益处。
J Transcult Nurs. 2024 May;35(3):185. doi: 10.1177/10436596241247667. Epub 2024 Apr 23.
2
Growing early career researchers pathways through co-review.通过共同评审促进早期职业研究人员的发展。
Nat Commun. 2024 Mar 5;15(1):1869. doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-45269-0.
3
The critical role of peer reviewers: Challenges and future steps.同行评审的关键作用:挑战与未来举措。
Nordisk Alkohol Nark. 2023 Feb;40(1):14-21. doi: 10.1177/14550725221092862. Epub 2022 Sep 1.
4
Conducting a sensitive, constructive and ethical peer review.进行一次敏感、建设性且符合道德规范的同行评审。
Nurs Open. 2022 Jul;9(4):1930-1932. doi: 10.1002/nop2.944. Epub 2021 May 21.
5
Co-reviewing and ghostwriting by early-career researchers in the peer review of manuscripts.投稿同行评审中早期职业研究人员的共同评审和代写行为。
Elife. 2019 Oct 31;8:e48425. doi: 10.7554/eLife.48425.
6
Celebrating and cultivating excellent peer review at JBC.《生物化学杂志》(JBC)对卓越同行评审的表彰与培育。
J Biol Chem. 2019 Sep 13;294(37):13850-13851. doi: 10.1074/jbc.E119.010822.
7
The effect of publishing peer review reports on referee behavior in five scholarly journals.发表同行评议报告对五个学术期刊审稿人行为的影响。
Nat Commun. 2019 Jan 18;10(1):322. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-08250-2.
8
Peer Review in Scientific Publications: Benefits, Critiques, & A Survival Guide.科学出版物中的同行评审:益处、批判及生存指南。
EJIFCC. 2014 Oct 24;25(3):227-43. eCollection 2014 Oct.
9
Emerging trends in peer review-a survey.同行评审的新趋势——一项调查
Front Neurosci. 2015 May 27;9:169. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2015.00169. eCollection 2015.