Suppr超能文献

评估为瘦女性和肥胖女性分配跑步机运动负荷的方法。

Assessment of methods for assigning treadmill exercise workloads for lean and obese women.

作者信息

Farrell P A, Gustafson A B, Kalkhoff R K

出版信息

Int J Obes. 1985;9(1):49-58.

PMID:4019018
Abstract

The use of relative oxygen consumption (% VO2 max) to equate workloads between trained and untrained subjects is considered appropriate. Whether this method (% VO2 max) is correct when testing lean versus obese subjects has not been studied. Using three experimental sessions separated by at least one week we studied seven obese, nondiabetic women weighting 140 +/- 21 kg (mean +/- s.d.) and 10 lean women of similar age weighing 51 +/- 5 kg during treadmill walking. Body fat determined by hydrostatic weighing was 50 +/- 7 and 23 +/- 7 percent in obese and lean groups, respectively (P less than 0.05). Absolute maximal VO2 (VO2 max) in obese women (3.18 +/- 0.28 l/min) significantly exceeded VO2 max for lean women (2.45 +/- 0.31 l/min, P less than 0.05). However, in obese women VO2 max relative to total body weight (TBW) was lower (P less than 0.05) while VO2 max relative to fat-free weight (FFW) was similar to corresponding values for lean women. Submaximal treadmill exercise at 75m/min with 0, 5 and 10 percent inclines resulted in higher VO2 (l/min) and heart rate (HR) in the obese group (P less than 0.05). At each incline VO2 relative to BW was significantly lower in the obese (P less than 0.05) yet significantly higher when expressed relative to FFW (P less than 0.05). The relationship between HR and %VO2 max was similar for lean and obese. Ten minutes of walking at 70% VO2 max resulted in no significant differences between the groups in the 10 min values for HR, total work done, rise in rectal temperature, plasma lactic acid, perceived exertion and oxygen consumption relative to FFW. We conclude that either fixed absolute workloads or fixed oxygen consumption (absolute or relative to BW or FFW) are inappropriate methods for equating workloads when lean and obese subjects are compared. Relative VO2 accurately defines physiologically comparable exercise intensities for these groups and this should be the method of preference when studies are designed to investigate metabolic, endocrine or cardiovascular similarities and/or differences between these groups.

摘要

使用相对耗氧量(%最大摄氧量)来使训练有素和未经训练的受试者之间的工作量相等被认为是合适的。当测试瘦人与肥胖受试者时,这种方法(%最大摄氧量)是否正确尚未得到研究。我们通过三个至少间隔一周的实验环节,对7名体重140±21千克(平均±标准差)的肥胖非糖尿病女性和10名年龄相仿、体重51±5千克的瘦女性进行了跑步机行走实验。通过水下称重测定的肥胖组和瘦组的体脂分别为50±7%和23±7%(P<0.05)。肥胖女性的绝对最大摄氧量(最大摄氧量)(3.18±0.28升/分钟)显著超过瘦女性的最大摄氧量(2.45±0.31升/分钟,P<0.05)。然而,肥胖女性相对于总体重(TBW)的最大摄氧量较低(P<0.05),而相对于去脂体重(FFW)的最大摄氧量与瘦女性的相应值相似。在跑步机上以75米/分钟、坡度为0%、5%和10%进行亚极量运动时,肥胖组的摄氧量(升/分钟)和心率(HR)较高(P<0.05)。在每个坡度下,肥胖者相对于体重的摄氧量显著较低(P<0.05),但相对于去脂体重表示时则显著较高(P<0.05)。瘦人和肥胖者心率与%最大摄氧量之间的关系相似。以70%最大摄氧量行走10分钟,两组在心率、总功、直肠温度升高、血浆乳酸、主观用力程度和相对于去脂体重的耗氧量的10分钟值方面没有显著差异。我们得出结论,当比较瘦人和肥胖受试者时,固定的绝对工作量或固定的耗氧量(绝对或相对于体重或去脂体重)是使工作量相等的不适当方法。相对摄氧量准确地定义了这些组在生理上可比的运动强度,当研究旨在调查这些组之间的代谢、内分泌或心血管方面的异同点时,这应该是首选的方法。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验