Cho HyunYi, Carpenter Christopher J, Li Wenbo
School of Communication, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, United States.
School of Communication and Media, Western Illinois University, Macomb, IL, United States.
Hum Commun Res. 2025 Mar 28;51(2):57-79. doi: 10.1093/hcr/hqaf004. eCollection 2025 Apr.
We conducted a comprehensive meta-analysis of 160 media literacy interventions from 1983 to 2023, finding overall positive effects. Effects were larger for media-over behavior-relevant outcomes and for social over health topics. Stronger effects were found for knowledge outcomes at both immediate-post and delayed follow-up assessments. Attitudes and critical beliefs predicted behavior. No substantial decay in effects was observed between immediate-post and follow-up assessments for multiple outcomes but not for behavior. Interventions targeting social media showed smaller effects for some outcomes compared to those that did not. Online delivery had smaller effects for various outcomes compared to in-person delivery. These findings suggest challenges and opportunities regarding digital and social media for the interventions. Dose was inconsistently linked to outcomes. No significant relationship was found between study year and effect size. The heterogeneity of effects observed across variables suggests a need for more parsimonious frameworks in media literacy research.
我们对1983年至2023年期间的160项媒介素养干预措施进行了全面的荟萃分析,发现总体效果是积极的。与行为相关的结果相比,媒介相关结果的效果更大;与健康主题相比,社会主题的效果更强。在即时后测和延迟随访评估中,知识结果的效果更强。态度和批判性信念可预测行为。对于多个结果,即时后测和随访评估之间未观察到效果的大幅衰减,但行为结果除外。与未针对社交媒体的干预措施相比,针对社交媒体的干预措施在某些结果上的效果较小。与面对面授课相比,在线授课在各种结果上的效果较小。这些发现表明,在数字和社交媒体方面,干预措施既面临挑战也存在机遇。剂量与结果的关联并不一致。未发现研究年份与效应大小之间存在显著关系。各变量间观察到的效果异质性表明,媒介素养研究需要更简洁的框架。