Hegedűs Mihály, Dadkhah Mehdi, Dávid Lóránt Dénes
Tomori Pál College, Chamber of Hungarian Auditors, Budapest, Hungary.
Amrita School of Engineering, Amrita Vishwa Vidyapeetham, Amritapuri, Kerala, India.
Adv Pharm Bull. 2024 Dec 30;14(4):729-736. doi: 10.34172/apb.43763. Epub 2024 Sep 24.
Hijacked journals are journals managed by cybercriminals that mimic the original journal and publish manuscripts without peer review, charging a fee to the author. Although there is literature on hijacked journals, there is a gap in the content of published papers in the hijacked journals. This study aims to analyze the content of published papers in hijacked journals to assess their alignment with various Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs).
About 21 medicine journals have been investigated and about 3300 published manuscripts in them analyzed in terms of SDGs using the text-based analyzing method.
The findings indicated that published manuscripts fit in the categories of SDG 01, SDG 03, SDG 11, and SDG 16 where SDG-03 is most dominant.
The awareness about the problem of hijacked journals is critical, especially for developing countries, to eliminate the negative effects of these journals. It is the first research that discusses the negative effect of hijacked journals by considering SDGs and sheds light on the phenomenon.
被劫持期刊是由网络犯罪分子管理的期刊，它们模仿原始期刊，不经同行评审就发表稿件，并向作者收费。尽管有关于被劫持期刊的文献，但被劫持期刊上发表论文的内容存在空白。本研究旨在分析被劫持期刊上发表论文的内容，以评估它们与各项可持续发展目标（SDG）的一致性。
对约21种医学期刊进行了调查，并使用基于文本的分析方法，从可持续发展目标的角度分析了其中约3300篇已发表的手稿。
研究结果表明，已发表的手稿符合可持续发展目标1、可持续发展目标3、可持续发展目标11和可持续发展目标16的类别，其中可持续发展目标3最为突出。
提高对被劫持期刊问题的认识至关重要，特别是对发展中国家而言，以消除这些期刊的负面影响。这是第一项通过考虑可持续发展目标来探讨被劫持期刊负面影响并揭示这一现象的研究。
