Feldacker Caryl, Usiri Joel, Kiruthu-Kamamia Christine, Waehrer Geetha, Weldemariam Hiwot, Huwa Jacqueline, Hau Jessie, Thawani Agness, Chapanda Mirriam, Tweya Hannock
Department of Global Health, University of Washington, 3980 15th Ave NE, Seattle, WA 98195, USA.
International Training and Education Center for Health, HMC#359932325 9th Avenue, Seattle, WA 98104-2499, USA.
Oxf Open Digit Health. 2024;2(Suppl 2):ii9-ii17. doi: 10.1093/oodh/oqae025. Epub 2024 Dec 2.
Many digital health interventions (DHIs), including mobile health (mHealth) apps, aim to improve both client outcomes and efficiency like electronic medical record systems (EMRS). Although interoperability is the gold standard, it is also complex and costly, requiring technical expertise, stakeholder permissions and sustained funding. processes are commonly used to 'integrate' across systems and allow for assessment of DHI impact, a best practice, before further investment. For mHealth, the manual data linkage workload, including related monitoring and evaluation (M&E) activities, remains poorly understood. As a baseline study for an open-source app to mirror EMRS and reduce healthcare worker (HCW) workload while improving care in the Nurse-led Community-based Antiretroviral therapy Program (NCAP) in Lilongwe, Malawi, we conducted a time-motion study observing HCWs completing data management activities, including routine M&E and manual data linkage of individual-level app data to EMRS. Data management tasks should reduce or end with successful app implementation and EMRS integration. Data were analysed in Excel. We observed 69:53:00 of HCWs performing routine NCAP service delivery tasks: 39:52:00 (57%) was spent completing M&E data related tasks of which 15:57:00 (23%) was spent on manual data linkage workload, alone. Understanding the workload to ensure quality M&E data, including to complete manual data linkage of mHealth apps to EMRS, provides stakeholders with inputs to drive DHI innovations and integration decision making. Quantifying potential mHealth benefits on more efficient, high-quality M&E data may trigger new innovations to reduce workloads and strengthen evidence to spur continuous improvement.
许多数字健康干预措施(DHI),包括移动健康(mHealth)应用程序,旨在像电子病历系统(EMRS)一样改善客户治疗效果和提高效率。尽管互操作性是金标准,但它也很复杂且成本高昂,需要技术专长、利益相关者的许可和持续的资金投入。通常采用流程来实现跨系统“集成”,并在进一步投资之前对DHI影响进行评估,这是一种最佳实践。对于移动健康而言,包括相关监测和评估(M&E)活动在内的手动数据链接工作量仍未得到充分了解。作为一项针对一款开源应用程序的基线研究,该应用程序旨在镜像电子病历系统并减轻医护人员(HCW)的工作量,同时改善马拉维利隆圭护士主导的社区抗逆转录病毒治疗项目(NCAP)中的护理,我们进行了一项时间动作研究,观察医护人员完成数据管理活动,包括常规监测和评估以及将个人层面的应用程序数据手动链接到电子病历系统。数据管理任务应随着应用程序的成功实施和电子病历系统的集成而减少或结束。数据在Excel中进行分析。我们观察到医护人员执行常规NCAP服务交付任务的时间为69:53:00:其中39:52:00(57%)用于完成与监测和评估数据相关的任务,其中仅15:57:00(23%)用于手动数据链接工作量。了解工作量以确保高质量的监测和评估数据,包括完成移动健康应用程序与电子病历系统的手动数据链接,为利益相关者提供了推动数字健康干预创新和集成决策的依据。量化移动健康在更高效、高质量的监测和评估数据方面的潜在益处,可能会引发新的创新,以减少工作量并加强证据,从而推动持续改进。