• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Improving gender equity in academia depends on the workplace environment.提高学术界的性别平等取决于工作场所环境。
Elife. 2025 Apr 7;14:e105352. doi: 10.7554/eLife.105352.
2
Gender bias in academia: A lifetime problem that needs solutions.学术界的性别偏见:一个需要解决的终身问题。
Neuron. 2021 Jul 7;109(13):2047-2074. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2021.06.002.
3
A trainee-led approach to tackling gender inequity in immunology.一种由实习生主导的解决免疫学领域性别不平等问题的方法。
Immunol Cell Biol. 2025 Mar;103(3):265-269. doi: 10.1111/imcb.70008. Epub 2025 Feb 27.
4
Lessons from an initiative to address gender bias.从解决性别偏见的举措中吸取教训。
Elife. 2021 Dec 15;10:e75818. doi: 10.7554/eLife.75818.
5
Seeking Gender Equity in Pharmacy Academia.追求药学学术界的性别平等。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2023 Apr;87(3):ajpe9050. doi: 10.5688/ajpe9050. Epub 2022 Aug 12.
6
Gender Equity in Sport-Science Academia: We Still Have a Long Way to Go!体育科学学术界的性别平等:我们仍有很长的路要走!
Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2024 Jul 23;19(9):849-850. doi: 10.1123/ijspp.2024-0279. Print 2024 Sep 1.
7
Barriers to gender equity for female healthcare academicians and researchers in Pakistan: Is it still an issue?巴基斯坦女医疗保健学者和研究人员实现性别平等的障碍:这仍然是一个问题吗?
Front Public Health. 2023 Jan 4;10:981178. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.981178. eCollection 2022.
8
To be, or not to be, part-time in academia.在学术界,做兼职还是不做兼职。
Elife. 2025 Feb 20;14:e106336. doi: 10.7554/eLife.106336.
9
Is medical school culture conducive to women's academic success? a survey on faculty perceptions and experiences of gender equity.医学院校文化是否有利于女性取得学术成就?一项关于教师对性别平等的看法和经历的调查。
BMC Med Educ. 2024 Dec 18;24(1):1462. doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-06470-3.
10
Achieving gender equity in academic psychiatry - barriers to involvement and solutions for success.实现学术精神病学中的性别平等——参与的障碍和成功的解决方案。
Australas Psychiatry. 2024 Dec;32(6):563-567. doi: 10.1177/10398562241268362. Epub 2024 Aug 22.

本文引用的文献

1
Gender and retention patterns among U.S. faculty.美国教职员工中的性别与留任模式。
Sci Adv. 2023 Oct 20;9(42):eadi2205. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.adi2205.
2
Toward Parsimony in Bias Research: A Proposed Common Framework of Belief-Consistent Information Processing for a Set of Biases.走向偏见研究的简约化:一套偏见的信念一致信息处理的通用框架
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2023 Nov;18(6):1464-1487. doi: 10.1177/17456916221148147. Epub 2023 Mar 17.
3
Exclusive: Documents raise questions about UCLA's suspension of ecologist.独家报道:文件引发对加州大学洛杉矶分校暂停生态学家职务的质疑。
Nature. 2023 Feb 24. doi: 10.1038/d41586-023-00473-8.
4
The differential impact of COVID-19 on the work conditions of women and men academics during the lockdown.新冠疫情封锁期间,COVID-19对男女学者工作条件的不同影响。
Gend Work Organ. 2021 Jan;28(Suppl 1):243-249. doi: 10.1111/gwao.12529. Epub 2020 Sep 3.
5
How the entire scientific community can confront gender bias in the workplace.整个科学界如何应对职场中的性别偏见。
Nat Ecol Evol. 2019 Jan;3(1):3-6. doi: 10.1038/s41559-018-0747-4.
6
Gender Diversity in a STEM Subfield - Analysis of a Large Scientific Society and Its Annual Conferences.科学、技术、工程和数学领域中的性别多样性——对一个大型科学学会及其年会的分析。
J Am Soc Mass Spectrom. 2017 Dec;28(12):2523-2531. doi: 10.1007/s13361-017-1803-z. Epub 2017 Sep 26.
7
Double-blind review favours increased representation of female authors.双盲评审有利于增加女性作者的代表性。
Trends Ecol Evol. 2008 Jan;23(1):4-6. doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2007.07.008. Epub 2007 Oct 25.

提高学术界的性别平等取决于工作场所环境。

Improving gender equity in academia depends on the workplace environment.

作者信息

Bhadra Sreetama, Damasceno Gabriella, Hoss Daniela, Weyrich Alexandra

机构信息

German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv), Halle-Jena-Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.

Leipzig University, Leipzig, Germany.

出版信息

Elife. 2025 Apr 7;14:e105352. doi: 10.7554/eLife.105352.

DOI:10.7554/eLife.105352
PMID:40192013
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11975367/
Abstract

The iDiv Female Scientists initiative at the German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv) Halle-Jena-Leipzig in Germany was set up to connect women in science and to raise awareness of gender inequity. In this article we discuss the impact of the workplace environment on women in academia. Our experiences indicate that supportive workplace environments are more likely to discuss gender inequity, enabling "bottom-up" approaches where individual researchers can propose solutions to the problem. In contrast, unsupportive environments are less receptive to such discussions, so "top-down" approaches driven by legislation policies are required to improve the situation. We also make recommendations of actions that can be taken by individuals, institutions and policymakers to promote gender equity.

摘要

德国哈雷 - 耶拿 - 莱比锡综合生物多样性研究中心(iDiv)的iDiv女性科学家倡议旨在将科学界的女性联系起来,并提高对性别不平等问题的认识。在本文中,我们讨论了工作场所环境对学术界女性的影响。我们的经验表明,支持性的工作场所环境更有可能讨论性别不平等问题,从而促成“自下而上”的方法,即个别研究人员可以提出解决问题的方案。相比之下,不支持性的环境对这类讨论的接受度较低,因此需要由立法政策推动的“自上而下”方法来改善这种状况。我们还就个人、机构和政策制定者为促进性别平等可采取的行动提出了建议。