Suppr超能文献

走向偏见研究的简约化:一套偏见的信念一致信息处理的通用框架

Toward Parsimony in Bias Research: A Proposed Common Framework of Belief-Consistent Information Processing for a Set of Biases.

机构信息

Department of Media Psychology, University of Hagen.

Leibniz-Institut für Wissensmedien, Tübingen.

出版信息

Perspect Psychol Sci. 2023 Nov;18(6):1464-1487. doi: 10.1177/17456916221148147. Epub 2023 Mar 17.

Abstract

One of the essential insights from psychological research is that people's information processing is often biased. By now, a number of different biases have been identified and empirically demonstrated. Unfortunately, however, these biases have often been examined in separate lines of research, thereby precluding the recognition of shared principles. Here we argue that several-so far mostly unrelated-biases (e.g., bias blind spot, hostile media bias, egocentric/ethnocentric bias, outcome bias) can be traced back to the combination of a fundamental prior belief and humans' tendency toward belief-consistent information processing. What varies between different biases is essentially the specific belief that guides information processing. More importantly, we propose that different biases even share the same underlying belief and differ only in the specific outcome of information processing that is assessed (i.e., the dependent variable), thus tapping into different manifestations of the same latent information processing. In other words, we propose for discussion a model that suffices to explain several different biases. We thereby suggest a more parsimonious approach compared with current theoretical explanations of these biases. We also generate novel hypotheses that follow directly from the integrative nature of our perspective.

摘要

从心理学研究中得出的一个重要见解是,人们的信息处理往往存在偏差。到目前为止,已经确定并通过实证研究证明了许多不同的偏见。然而,不幸的是,这些偏见通常在单独的研究中进行研究,从而无法认识到共同的原则。在这里,我们认为,目前为止,一些(例如,偏见盲点、敌对媒体偏见、自我中心/民族中心偏见、结果偏见)的偏见可以追溯到基本的先验信念和人类倾向于一致信念的信息处理的结合。不同偏见之间的差异主要是指导信息处理的具体信念。更重要的是,我们提出,不同的偏见甚至共享相同的基本信念,而只是在评估的信息处理的具体结果(即因变量)上有所不同,从而揭示了同一潜在信息处理的不同表现形式。换句话说,我们提出了一个可供讨论的模型,可以充分解释几种不同的偏见。与目前对这些偏见的理论解释相比,我们提出了一种更简约的方法。我们还根据我们观点的综合性质产生了直接的新假设。

相似文献

4
The Case for Heterogeneity in Metacognitive Appraisals of Biased Beliefs.关于有偏差信念的元认知评估中异质性的理由。
Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 2025 May;29(2):188-212. doi: 10.1177/10888683241251520. Epub 2024 Jun 7.
8
Beliefs and biases.信念与偏见。
Synthese. 2021;199(3-4):7575-7594. doi: 10.1007/s11229-021-03129-0. Epub 2021 Mar 27.

引用本文的文献

7
The Universal Optimism of the Self-Evidencing Mind.自证思维的普遍乐观主义。
Entropy (Basel). 2024 Jun 17;26(6):518. doi: 10.3390/e26060518.
8
How Can Debiasing Research Aid Efforts to Reduce Discrimination?去偏研究如何助力减少歧视的努力?
Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 2025 Feb;29(1):81-105. doi: 10.1177/10888683241244829. Epub 2024 Apr 22.
10
Beliefs Made It into Science: Believe It or Not.信念融入科学:信不信由你。
Function (Oxf). 2023 Sep 2;4(6):zqad049. doi: 10.1093/function/zqad049. eCollection 2023.

本文引用的文献

3
All Thinking is 'Wishful' Thinking.一切思维都是“一厢情愿”的思维。
Trends Cogn Sci. 2020 Jun;24(6):413-424. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2020.03.004. Epub 2020 Apr 11.
7
A Cognitive-Ecological Explanation of Intergroup Biases.群体间偏见的认知-生态解释。
Psychol Sci. 2018 Jul;29(7):1126-1133. doi: 10.1177/0956797618756862. Epub 2018 May 10.
9
Poor metacognitive awareness of belief change.对信念改变的元认知意识薄弱。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2018 Sep;71(9):1898-1910. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2017.1363792. Epub 2018 Jan 1.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验