Suppr超能文献

一项随机、多中心、活性对照试验中增强型单焦点与标准单焦点人工晶状体视力结果的比较。

Comparison of Visual Acuity Outcomes of Enhanced Monofocal Versus Standard Monofocal Intraocular Lenses from a Randomized, Multicenter, Active-Controlled Trial.

作者信息

Ang Robert Edward T, Khoramnia Ramin, Uy Harvey S, Hoffmann Peter, Anello Robert D, Zalewski Dominik, Januschowski Kai, de Arriba Palomero Pablo, Böhringer Daniel, Barberá Marta Ibarz, Bertelmann Eckart, Cisiecki Slawomir, Dick H Burkhard, Lorenz Katrin, Auffarth Gerd U, Ruiz-Mesa Ramón, Relucio Alvin S

出版信息

J Refract Surg. 2025 Apr;41(4):e300-e309. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20250218-01. Epub 2025 Apr 1.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To compare visual performance of the Vivinex Impress enhanced monofocal intraocular lens (IOL) (HOYA Surgical Optics) with the Acrysof IQ monofocal IOL (Alcon Laboratories, Inc).

METHODS

In this multicenter, active-controlled trial, participants were randomized 2:1 to bilateral implantation with the enhanced monofocal (test) or standard monofocal (control) IOL and examined through 12 months postoperatively for visual acuities, refractive outcomes, defocus curves, and pupil diameters.

RESULTS

Ninety-eight test and 46 control participants completed testing for the first implanted eye. The test arm demonstrated a statistically significant benefit in monocular distance-corrected intermediate visual acuity (DCIVA) (photopic: 1.2 lines, < .001; mesopic: 0.7 lines, = .01) and uncorrected intermediate visual acuity (0.8 lines; < .001) but no significant difference in monocular corrected distance visual acuity ( = .07). Using a stepwise regression analysis for DCIVA, the final model (adjusted R-square, 0.31) identified three significant predictor variables (age, pupil diameter, and treatment arm). Photopic defocus curves showed the test arm produced better monocular visual acuity from -1.00 through -2.50 D than the control arm. The intermediate vision benefit of the test IOL is independent of pupil size and axial length. Cumulative and persistent adverse events for the test IOL did not exceed the Safety and Performance Endpoint rates per International Organization for Standardization 11979-7.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared to a standard monofocal IOL, the Vivinex Impress enhanced monofocal IOL offers an extended range of vision, with significant improvements in intermediate vision and a DCIVA benefit unaffected by pupil size and axial length. This IOL is safe and effective for patients seeking improved intermediate vision following cataract surgery. .

摘要

目的

比较Vivinex Impress增强型单焦点人工晶状体(IOL)(豪雅眼科光学公司)与Acrysof IQ单焦点IOL(爱尔康实验室公司)的视觉性能。

方法

在这项多中心、主动对照试验中,参与者以2:1的比例随机接受双侧植入增强型单焦点(试验)或标准单焦点(对照)IOL,并在术后12个月进行视力、屈光结果、散焦曲线和瞳孔直径检查。

结果

98名试验参与者和46名对照参与者完成了对第一只植入眼的测试。试验组在单眼距离矫正中间视力(DCIVA)(明视:1.2行,P<0.001;中视:0.7行,P = 0.01)和未矫正中间视力(0.8行;P<0.001)方面显示出统计学上的显著优势,但在单眼矫正远视力方面无显著差异(P = 0.07)。对DCIVA进行逐步回归分析,最终模型(调整后R平方,0.31)确定了三个显著的预测变量(年龄、瞳孔直径和治疗组)。明视散焦曲线显示,试验组在-1.00至-2.50 D范围内的单眼视力优于对照组。试验IOL的中间视力优势与瞳孔大小和眼轴长度无关。试验IOL的累积和持续性不良事件未超过国际标准化组织11979-7规定的安全和性能终点率。

结论

与标准单焦点IOL相比,Vivinex Impress增强型单焦点IOL提供了更广泛的视力范围,中间视力有显著改善,且DCIVA优势不受瞳孔大小和眼轴长度的影响。对于白内障手术后寻求改善中间视力的患者,这种IOL是安全有效的。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验