Schnepel Jona, Mielitz Annabelle, Albrecht Urs-Vito
Department of Digital Medicine, Medical School OWL, Bielefeld University, Bielefeld, Germany.
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2025 Apr 8;323:389-393. doi: 10.3233/SHTI250118.
Digital health applications (apps) have the potential to enhance treatment, but poor-quality apps can pose risks, emphasizing the need for standardized quality criteria. This paper reviews existing approaches to assessing health app quality, identifying 18 studies that focus on both general and specialized evaluation frameworks, including tools like MARS (Mobile App Rating Score). The analysis highlights six key quality domains: technical features, user experience, general features, health information quality, ethical and legal conformity, and data security. Among these, 'user experience' and 'health information quality' were the most frequently cited criteria. While many frameworks share similar criteria, their evaluation methods differ. The findings stress the importance of establishing standards and fostering collaboration to ensure consistent quality assessment of health apps.
数字健康应用程序(应用)有增强治疗效果的潜力,但质量不佳的应用可能带来风险,这凸显了制定标准化质量标准的必要性。本文回顾了评估健康应用质量的现有方法,确定了18项侧重于通用和专门评估框架的研究,包括像MARS(移动应用评分系统)这样的工具。分析突出了六个关键质量领域:技术特性、用户体验、通用特性、健康信息质量、伦理和法律合规性以及数据安全。其中,“用户体验”和“健康信息质量”是最常被提及的标准。虽然许多框架有相似的标准,但其评估方法有所不同。研究结果强调了建立标准和促进合作以确保对健康应用进行一致质量评估的重要性。