Suppr超能文献

经单一标准经皮肾镜通道联合输尿管镜的针状肾镜治疗复杂非梗阻性肾结石

Needle nephroscope combined with ureteroscope via a single standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy channel for the treatment of complex non-obstructing renal stones.

作者信息

Yi Xinyu, Li Jin

机构信息

Department of Urology, Xiangtan Central Hospital, Xiangtan, Hunan, China.

出版信息

Front Surg. 2025 Mar 25;12:1573548. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2025.1573548. eCollection 2025.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare the safety and efficacy of four different surgical approaches for the treatment of complex non-hydronephrotic renal stones.

METHODS

A total of 88 patients with complex non-hydronephrotic renal stones, who underwent surgical treatment at Xiangtan Central Hospital from January 2022 to December 2023, were included in this study. The patients were divided into two groups based on their CT values. Group 1 (CT ≥ 1,000) included 22 patients who underwent puncture-assisted single standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) with a laser for stone fragmentation and retrieval (experimental group), and 12 patients who underwent multi-standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy (control group). Group 2 (CT < 1,000) included 21 patients who underwent puncture-assisted single standard PCNL combined with ureteroscopic laser lithotripsy (experimental group), and 33 patients who underwent transurethral ureteroscopic laser lithotripsy (control group). The surgical variables including intraoperative blood loss, operative time, hospital stay, stone clearance rate, and postoperative complications were recorded. Statistical analysis was performed using chi-square test or Fisher's exact test for categorical data, and -test for continuous data.

RESULTS

The two groups were comparable in terms of age, sex, BMI, hypertension, coronary heart disease, diabetes, and preoperative white blood cell count ( > 0.01). In both CT ≥ 1,000 and CT < 1,000 groups, the experimental group had significantly less intraoperative blood loss, shorter operative time, and shorter hospital stay compared to the control group ( < 0.01). In the CT ≥ 1,000 control group, the stone clearance rate was higher, and two cases of postoperative bleeding (considered arteriovenous fistula) were managed with interventional embolization. In the CT < 1,000 control group, the stone clearance rate was lower, and three cases of postoperative fever (with a maximum temperature of 39.5°C) required an extended antibiotic course for 7 days before discharge.

CONCLUSION

For complex non-hydronephrotic renal stones, a CT value ≥ 1,000 should be treated with single standard PCNL using a puncture-assisted method; a CT value < 1,000 is better treated with a combination of puncture-assisted single standard PCNL and ureteroscopic laser lithotripsy, with higher safety and efficacy.

摘要

目的

比较四种不同手术方法治疗复杂性非肾积水性肾结石的安全性和有效性。

方法

本研究纳入了2022年1月至2023年12月在湘潭市中心医院接受手术治疗的88例复杂性非肾积水性肾结石患者。根据CT值将患者分为两组。第1组(CT≥1000)包括22例行穿刺辅助单通道标准经皮肾镜取石术(PCNL)联合激光碎石取石术的患者(实验组)和12例行多通道经皮肾镜取石术的患者(对照组)。第2组(CT<1000)包括21例行穿刺辅助单通道PCNL联合输尿管镜激光碎石术的患者(实验组)和33例行经尿道输尿管镜激光碎石术的患者(对照组)。记录手术相关变量,包括术中出血量、手术时间、住院时间、结石清除率和术后并发症。分类数据采用卡方检验或Fisher精确检验进行统计分析,连续数据采用t检验进行统计分析。

结果

两组在年龄、性别、BMI、高血压、冠心病、糖尿病和术前白细胞计数方面具有可比性(P>0.01)。在CT≥1000组和CT<1000组中,实验组与对照组相比,术中出血量明显更少,手术时间更短,住院时间更短(P<0.01)。在CT≥1000对照组中,结石清除率更高,2例术后出血(考虑为动静脉瘘)经介入栓塞治疗。在CT<1000对照组中,结石清除率更低,3例术后发热(最高体温39.5℃)出院前需延长抗生素疗程7天。

结论

对于复杂性非肾积水性肾结石,CT值≥1000时应采用穿刺辅助单通道PCNL治疗;CT值<1000时采用穿刺辅助单通道PCNL联合输尿管镜激光碎石术治疗效果更佳,安全性和有效性更高。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5679/11975929/12a6dfff092c/fsurg-12-1573548-g001.jpg

相似文献

2
Outcomes following 'mini' percutaneous nephrolithotomy for renal calculi in children. A single-centre study.
J Pediatr Urol. 2015 Jun;11(3):120.e1-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2014.09.008. Epub 2015 Mar 7.
6
8
Mini vs standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy for renal stones: a comparative study.
Urolithiasis. 2019 Apr;47(2):207-214. doi: 10.1007/s00240-018-1055-9. Epub 2018 Mar 16.
9
Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy in the Management of Renal Stone: An Audit of Outcomes and Complications.
Ann Afr Med. 2025 Apr 1;24(2):461-467. doi: 10.4103/aam.aam_5_25. Epub 2025 Mar 7.

本文引用的文献

2
Percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus retrograde intrarenal surgery for treatment of renal stones in adults.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Nov 13;11(11):CD013445. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013445.pub2.
6
The "all-seeing needle" micro-PCNL versus flexible ureterorenoscopy for lower calyceal stones of ≤ 2 cm.
Urolithiasis. 2019 Apr;47(2):201-206. doi: 10.1007/s00240-018-1049-7. Epub 2018 Mar 1.
7
Percutaneous nephrolithotomy: complications and how to deal with them.
Urolithiasis. 2018 Feb;46(1):87-97. doi: 10.1007/s00240-017-1022-x. Epub 2017 Nov 17.
9
Ultra-mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy: A minimally-invasive option for percutaneous stone removal.
Indian J Urol. 2016 Apr-Jun;32(2):132-6. doi: 10.4103/0970-1591.174778.
10
Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy: Update, Trends, and Future Directions.
Eur Urol. 2016 Aug;70(2):382-96. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2016.01.047. Epub 2016 Feb 11.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验