• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

用于从粪便标本中分析人类肠道微生物群落的 PCR-DGGE 的 DNA 提取试剂盒比较。

Comparison of DNA extraction kits for PCR-DGGE analysis of human intestinal microbial communities from fecal specimens.

机构信息

Department of Foods and Nutrition, Purdue University, 700 West State St, West Lafayette, IN 47907-2059, USA.

出版信息

Nutr J. 2010 May 22;9:23. doi: 10.1186/1475-2891-9-23.

DOI:10.1186/1475-2891-9-23
PMID:20492702
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2901363/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The influence of diet on intestinal microflora has been investigated mainly using conventional microbiological approaches. Although these studies have advanced knowledge on human intestinal microflora, it is imperative that new methods are applied to facilitate scientific progress. Culture-independent molecular fingerprinting method of Polymerase Chain Reaction and Denaturing Gradient Gel Electrophoresis (PCR-DGGE) has been used to study microbial communities in a variety of environmental samples. However, these protocols must be optimized prior to their application in order to enhance the quality and accuracy of downstream analyses. In this study, the relative efficacy of four commercial DNA extraction kits (Mobio Ultra Clean(R) Fecal DNA Isolation Kit, M; QIAamp DNA Stool Mini Kit, Q; FastDNA SPIN Kit, FSp; FastDNA SPIN Kit for Soil, FSo) were evaluated. Further, PCR-DGGE technique was also assessed for its feasibility in detecting differences in human intestinal bacterial fingerprint profiles.

METHOD

Total DNA was extracted from varying weights of human fecal specimens using four different kits, followed by PCR amplification of bacterial 16S rRNA genes, and DGGE separation of the amplicons.

RESULTS

Regardless of kit, maximum DNA yield was obtained using 10 to 50 mg (wet wt) of fecal specimens and similar DGGE profiles were obtained. However, kits FSp and FSo extracted significantly larger amounts of DNA per g dry fecal specimens and produced more bands on their DGGE profiles than kits M and Q due to their use of bead-containing lysing matrix and vigorous shaking step. DGGE of 16S rRNA gene PCR products was suitable for capturing the profiles of human intestinal microbial community and enabled rapid comparative assessment of inter- and intra-subject differences.

CONCLUSION

We conclude that extraction kits that incorporated bead-containing lysing matrix and vigorous shaking produced high quality DNA from human fecal specimens (10 to 50 mg, wet wt) that can be resolved as bacterial community fingerprints using PCR-DGGE technique. Subsequently, PCR-DGGE technique can be applied for studying variations in human intestinal microbial communities.

摘要

背景

人们主要采用传统微生物方法研究饮食对肠道微生物群的影响。虽然这些研究推动了人类肠道微生物群的相关知识,但应用新方法促进科学进步势在必行。聚合酶链反应和变性梯度凝胶电泳(PCR-DGGE)的无培养分子指纹图谱方法已被用于研究各种环境样本中的微生物群落。然而,在将这些方案应用于下游分析之前,必须对其进行优化,以提高质量和准确性。在这项研究中,评估了四种商业 DNA 提取试剂盒(Mobio Ultra Clean(R)粪便 DNA 分离试剂盒、M;QIAamp DNA 粪便试剂盒、Q;FastDNA SPIN 试剂盒、FSp;FastDNA SPIN 试剂盒,用于土壤,FSo)的相对功效。此外,还评估了 PCR-DGGE 技术在检测人类肠道细菌指纹图谱差异方面的可行性。

方法

使用四种不同的试剂盒从不同重量的人类粪便标本中提取总 DNA,然后对细菌 16S rRNA 基因进行 PCR 扩增,并对扩增子进行 DGGE 分离。

结果

无论使用哪种试剂盒,从 10 到 50mg(湿重)的粪便标本中都能获得最大的 DNA 产量,并且获得的 DGGE 图谱相似。然而,试剂盒 FSp 和 FSo 提取的每克干粪便标本中的 DNA 量明显多于试剂盒 M 和 Q,因为它们使用了含珠的裂解基质和剧烈的摇床步骤,并且在其 DGGE 图谱上产生了更多的条带。16S rRNA 基因 PCR 产物的 DGGE 适合捕捉人类肠道微生物群落的图谱,并能够快速比较评估个体间和个体内的差异。

结论

我们得出结论,从 10 到 50mg(湿重)的人类粪便标本中提取高质量 DNA 的试剂盒(含珠的裂解基质和剧烈的摇床),可通过 PCR-DGGE 技术作为细菌群落指纹图谱进行解析。随后,PCR-DGGE 技术可用于研究人类肠道微生物群落的变化。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d59a/2901363/387c6a3df980/1475-2891-9-23-6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d59a/2901363/04a7d7542a90/1475-2891-9-23-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d59a/2901363/d04a15cb8993/1475-2891-9-23-2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d59a/2901363/8d4abb1c5146/1475-2891-9-23-3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d59a/2901363/16e161853f30/1475-2891-9-23-4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d59a/2901363/9607f320ec89/1475-2891-9-23-5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d59a/2901363/387c6a3df980/1475-2891-9-23-6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d59a/2901363/04a7d7542a90/1475-2891-9-23-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d59a/2901363/d04a15cb8993/1475-2891-9-23-2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d59a/2901363/8d4abb1c5146/1475-2891-9-23-3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d59a/2901363/16e161853f30/1475-2891-9-23-4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d59a/2901363/9607f320ec89/1475-2891-9-23-5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d59a/2901363/387c6a3df980/1475-2891-9-23-6.jpg

相似文献

1
Comparison of DNA extraction kits for PCR-DGGE analysis of human intestinal microbial communities from fecal specimens.用于从粪便标本中分析人类肠道微生物群落的 PCR-DGGE 的 DNA 提取试剂盒比较。
Nutr J. 2010 May 22;9:23. doi: 10.1186/1475-2891-9-23.
2
Evaluation of QIAamp DNA Stool Mini Kit for ecological studies of gut microbiota.用于肠道微生物群生态研究的QIAamp DNA粪便迷你试剂盒评估
J Microbiol Methods. 2003 Jul;54(1):13-20. doi: 10.1016/s0167-7012(02)00260-9.
3
Microbial diversity in fecal samples depends on DNA extraction method: easyMag DNA extraction compared to QIAamp DNA stool mini kit extraction.粪便样本中的微生物多样性取决于DNA提取方法:与QIAamp DNA粪便微型试剂盒提取法相比,easyMag DNA提取法的情况。
BMC Res Notes. 2014 Jan 21;7:50. doi: 10.1186/1756-0500-7-50.
4
Comparison of commercial DNA extraction kits for isolation and purification of bacterial and eukaryotic DNA from PAH-contaminated soils.比较商用 DNA 提取试剂盒从多环芳烃污染土壤中分离和纯化细菌和真核生物 DNA 的效果。
Can J Microbiol. 2011 Aug;57(8):623-8. doi: 10.1139/w11-049. Epub 2011 Aug 4.
5
A comparison of the efficiency of five different commercial DNA extraction kits for extraction of DNA from faecal samples.比较五种不同商业 DNA 提取试剂盒从粪便样本中提取 DNA 的效率。
J Microbiol Methods. 2013 Aug;94(2):103-110. doi: 10.1016/j.mimet.2013.05.008. Epub 2013 May 14.
6
Impact of whole grain highland hull-less barley on the denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis profiles of gut microbial communities in rats fed high-fat diets.高脂饮食大鼠全谷物高原青稞麦麸对肠道微生物群落变性梯度凝胶电泳图谱的影响。
Microbiol Spectr. 2024 Jun 4;12(6):e0408923. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.04089-23. Epub 2024 May 15.
7
Comparison of commercial kits for the extraction of DNA from paddy soils.比较从稻田土壤中提取 DNA 的商用试剂盒。
Lett Appl Microbiol. 2013 Mar;56(3):222-8. doi: 10.1111/lam.12038. Epub 2013 Feb 4.
8
Evaluation of fecal DNA extraction protocols for human gut microbiome studies.用于人类肠道微生物组研究的粪便 DNA 提取方案评估。
BMC Microbiol. 2020 Jul 17;20(1):212. doi: 10.1186/s12866-020-01894-5.
9
Assessment of bacterial community structure in soil by polymerase chain reaction and denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis.通过聚合酶链反应和变性梯度凝胶电泳评估土壤中的细菌群落结构。
J Microbiol Methods. 1999 Oct;38(1-2):1-15. doi: 10.1016/s0167-7012(99)00054-8.
10
Comparison of DNA extraction protocols for microbial communities from soil treated with biochar.生物炭处理土壤中微生物群落DNA提取方法的比较
Braz J Microbiol. 2014 May 19;45(1):175-83. doi: 10.1590/s1517-83822014000100023. eCollection 2014.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparative pilot study of three commercial kits for bacterial DNA extraction from human subgingival biofilm samples collected with a single paper point.使用单个纸尖收集的人类龈下生物膜样本中三种用于细菌DNA提取的商业试剂盒的比较性初步研究。
J Oral Microbiol. 2025 Aug 21;17(1):2549035. doi: 10.1080/20002297.2025.2549035. eCollection 2025.
2
State-of-the-art approaches in the investigation of human seminal bacteriome using metagenomic methods.使用宏基因组学方法研究人类精液微生物组的最新技术进展。
Front Reprod Health. 2025 Jun 5;7:1557912. doi: 10.3389/frph.2025.1557912. eCollection 2025.
3
Comparison of different diagnostic protocols for the detection of Toxocara spp. in faecal samples of cats and dogs.

本文引用的文献

1
Comparison of DNA extraction methods for analysis of turkey cecal microbiota.用于火鸡盲肠微生物群分析的DNA提取方法比较
J Appl Microbiol. 2007 Feb;102(2):401-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2006.03094.x.
2
Optimization of terminal restriction fragment polymorphism (TRFLP) analysis of human gut microbiota.人类肠道微生物群末端限制性片段多态性(TRFLP)分析的优化
J Microbiol Methods. 2007 Feb;68(2):303-11. doi: 10.1016/j.mimet.2006.09.006. Epub 2006 Oct 27.
3
Molecular monitoring of the fecal microbiota of healthy human subjects during administration of lactulose and Saccharomyces boulardii.
比较不同诊断方案在猫和狗粪便样本中检测弓首蛔虫属的效果。
Parasit Vectors. 2024 Oct 24;17(1):436. doi: 10.1186/s13071-024-06524-x.
4
Multicenter comparative study of Enterocytozoon bieneusi DNA extraction methods from stool samples, and mechanical pretreatment protocols evaluation.多中心比较研究粪便样本中肠微孢子虫 DNA 提取方法和机械预处理方案评估。
Sci Rep. 2024 Jul 4;14(1):15404. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-66154-2.
5
Using formalin fixed paraffin embedded tissue to characterize the microbiota in p16-positive and p16-negative tongue squamous cell carcinoma: a pilot study.使用福尔马林固定石蜡包埋组织来表征 p16 阳性和 p16 阴性舌鳞状细胞癌中的微生物群:一项初步研究。
BMC Oral Health. 2024 Feb 28;24(1):283. doi: 10.1186/s12903-024-04051-w.
6
Processing-bias correction with DEBIAS-M improves cross-study generalization of microbiome-based prediction models.使用DEBIAS-M进行处理偏差校正可提高基于微生物组的预测模型的跨研究泛化能力。
bioRxiv. 2024 Feb 12:2024.02.09.579716. doi: 10.1101/2024.02.09.579716.
7
Two-step method for rapid isolation of genomic DNA and validation of R81T insecticide resistance mutation in .两步法快速分离基因组DNA及验证[具体物种]中R81T杀虫剂抗性突变
Saudi J Biol Sci. 2023 Nov;30(11):103791. doi: 10.1016/j.sjbs.2023.103791. Epub 2023 Aug 29.
8
Intravenous antibiotics in preterm infants have a negative effect upon microbiome development throughout preterm life.早产儿静脉注射抗生素对其整个早产期的微生物群发育有负面影响。
Gut Pathog. 2023 Apr 21;15(1):18. doi: 10.1186/s13099-023-00544-1.
9
Best practice for wildlife gut microbiome research: A comprehensive review of methodology for 16S rRNA gene investigations.野生动物肠道微生物组研究的最佳实践:16S rRNA基因调查方法的全面综述
Front Microbiol. 2023 Feb 22;14:1092216. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2023.1092216. eCollection 2023.
10
Grinding Beads Influence Microbial DNA Extraction from Organic-Rich Sub-Seafloor Sediment.研磨珠影响从富含有机物的海底以下沉积物中提取微生物DNA。
Microorganisms. 2022 Dec 18;10(12):2505. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms10122505.
在给予乳果糖和布拉酵母菌期间对健康人类受试者粪便微生物群进行分子监测。
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2006 Sep;72(9):5990-7. doi: 10.1128/AEM.00233-06.
4
Modulation of the microbial ecology of the human colon by probiotics, prebiotics and synbiotics to enhance human health: an overview of enabling science and potential applications.益生菌、益生元及合生元对人类结肠微生物生态的调节以促进人类健康:促进科学及潜在应用概述
FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2005 Apr 1;52(2):145-52. doi: 10.1016/j.femsec.2005.01.003.
5
Diversity of the human intestinal microbial flora.人类肠道微生物群的多样性。
Science. 2005 Jun 10;308(5728):1635-8. doi: 10.1126/science.1110591. Epub 2005 Apr 14.
6
Impact of consumption of oligosaccharide-containing biscuits on the fecal microbiota of humans.食用含低聚糖饼干对人体粪便微生物群的影响。
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2004 Apr;70(4):2129-36. doi: 10.1128/AEM.70.4.2129-2136.2004.
7
Effects of a controlled diet and black tea drinking on the fecal microflora composition and the fecal bile acid profile of human volunteers in a double-blinded randomized feeding study.在一项双盲随机喂养研究中,控制饮食和饮用红茶对人类志愿者粪便微生物群组成及粪便胆汁酸谱的影响。
J Nutr. 2004 Feb;134(2):473-8. doi: 10.1093/jn/134.2.473.
8
Selective plating underestimates abundance and shows differential recovery of bifidobacterial species from human feces.选择性培养法会低估双歧杆菌的数量,且显示出从人类粪便中回收双歧杆菌物种的差异。
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2003 Sep;69(9):5731-5. doi: 10.1128/AEM.69.9.5731-5735.2003.
9
Evaluation of QIAamp DNA Stool Mini Kit for ecological studies of gut microbiota.用于肠道微生物群生态研究的QIAamp DNA粪便迷你试剂盒评估
J Microbiol Methods. 2003 Jul;54(1):13-20. doi: 10.1016/s0167-7012(02)00260-9.
10
Analysis of the intestinal microflora using molecular methods.使用分子方法分析肠道微生物群。
Eur J Clin Nutr. 2002 Dec;56 Suppl 4:S44-9. doi: 10.1038/sj.ejcn.1601661.