Suppr超能文献

比较五种不同商业 DNA 提取试剂盒从粪便样本中提取 DNA 的效率。

A comparison of the efficiency of five different commercial DNA extraction kits for extraction of DNA from faecal samples.

机构信息

Division of Medical Microbiology, Department of Clinical Laboratory Science, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.

Division of Medical Microbiology, Department of Clinical Laboratory Science, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.

出版信息

J Microbiol Methods. 2013 Aug;94(2):103-110. doi: 10.1016/j.mimet.2013.05.008. Epub 2013 May 14.

Abstract

Differences in the composition of the gut microbiota have been associated with a range of diseases using culture-independent methods. Reliable extraction of nucleic acid is a key step in identifying the composition of the faecal microbiota. Five widely used commercial deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) extraction kits (QIAsymphony® Virus/Bacteria Midi Kit (kit QS), ZR Fecal DNA MiniPrep™ (kit Z), QIAamp® DNA Stool Mini Kit (kit QA), Ultraclean® Fecal DNA Isolation Kit (kit U) and PowerSoil® DNA Isolation Kit (kit P)) were evaluated, using human faecal samples. Yield, purity and integrity of total genomic DNA were compared spectrophotometrically and using gel electrophoresis. Three bacteria, commonly found in human faeces were quantified using real time polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) and total bacterial diversity was studied using denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE) as well as terminal restriction fragment length polymorphism (T-RFLP). The measurements of DNA yield and purity exhibited variations between the five kits tested in this study. Automated kit QS exhibited the best quality and highest quantity of DNA. All kits were shown to be reproducible with CV values≤0.46 for DNA extraction. qPCR results showed that all kits were uniformly efficient for extracting DNA from the selected target bacteria. DGGE and T-RFLP produced the highest diversity scores for DNA extracted using kit Z (H'=2.30 and 1.27) and kit QS (H'=2.16 and 0.94), which also extracted the highest DNA yields compared to the other kits assessed.

摘要

使用非培养方法,人们已经发现肠道微生物群落的组成差异与多种疾病相关。可靠地提取核酸是鉴定粪便微生物群落组成的关键步骤。本研究评估了 5 种广泛使用的商业化脱氧核糖核酸(DNA)提取试剂盒(QIAsymphony® Virus/Bacteria Midi Kit(试剂盒 QS)、ZR Fecal DNA MiniPrep™(试剂盒 Z)、QIAamp® DNA Stool Mini Kit(试剂盒 QA)、Ultraclean® Fecal DNA Isolation Kit(试剂盒 U)和 PowerSoil® DNA Isolation Kit(试剂盒 P)),使用人类粪便样本。通过分光光度法和凝胶电泳比较了总基因组 DNA 的产量、纯度和完整性。使用实时聚合酶链反应(qPCR)定量了 3 种常见的人粪便细菌,并通过变性梯度凝胶电泳(DGGE)和末端限制性片段长度多态性(T-RFLP)研究了总细菌多样性。在这项研究中,所测试的 5 种试剂盒之间的 DNA 产量和纯度的测量值存在差异。自动化试剂盒 QS 表现出最佳的质量和最高的 DNA 产量。所有试剂盒的 DNA 提取的重复性均较好,CV 值均≤0.46。qPCR 结果表明,所有试剂盒对于提取所选目标细菌的 DNA 均具有相同的效率。DGGE 和 T-RFLP 对试剂盒 Z(H'=2.30 和 1.27)和试剂盒 QS(H'=2.16 和 0.94)提取的 DNA 产生了最高的多样性评分,与评估的其他试剂盒相比,这两种试剂盒提取的 DNA 产量也最高。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c623/5809576/f0d456a69eb3/gr1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验