• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Laparoscopic vs open surgery in posterosuperior liver resections: a negative trial with positive implications-the real value lies in perioperative management.

作者信息

Brustia Raffaele, Sommacale Daniele

机构信息

Université Paris Est-Créteil, UPEC, F-94000 Créteil, France.

INSERM U955, Team "Pathophysiology and Therapy of Chronic Viral Hepatitis and Related Cancers", F-94000 Créteil, France.

出版信息

Lancet Reg Health Eur. 2025 Mar 19;51:101276. doi: 10.1016/j.lanepe.2025.101276. eCollection 2025 Apr.

DOI:10.1016/j.lanepe.2025.101276
PMID:40201630
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11978353/
Abstract
摘要

相似文献

1
Laparoscopic vs open surgery in posterosuperior liver resections: a negative trial with positive implications-the real value lies in perioperative management.腹腔镜手术与开腹手术用于肝后上叶切除术的比较：一项具有积极意义的阴性试验——真正价值在于围手术期管理
Lancet Reg Health Eur. 2025 Mar 19;51:101276. doi: 10.1016/j.lanepe.2025.101276. eCollection 2025 Apr.
2
Laparoscopic versus open resections in the posterosuperior liver segments within an enhanced recovery programme (ORANGE Segments): study protocol for a multicentre randomised controlled trial.腹腔镜与开腹肝后上段切除术在强化康复方案中的比较（ORANGE 节段）：一项多中心随机对照试验的研究方案。
Trials. 2022 Mar 9;23(1):206. doi: 10.1186/s13063-022-06112-3.
3
Laparoscopic versus open liver resection in the posterosuperior segments: a sub-group analysis from the OSLO-COMET randomized controlled trial.腹腔镜与开腹肝后上段切除术的比较：OSLO-COMET 随机对照试验的亚组分析。
HPB (Oxford). 2019 Nov;21(11):1485-1490. doi: 10.1016/j.hpb.2019.03.358. Epub 2019 Apr 5.
4
Robotic versus laparoscopic resections of posterosuperior segments of the liver: a propensity score-matched comparison.机器人手术与腹腔镜手术治疗肝后上段切除术：倾向评分匹配比较
Surg Endosc. 2016 Mar;30(3):1004-13. doi: 10.1007/s00464-015-4284-9. Epub 2015 Jun 27.
5
Propensity Score-Matching Analysis Comparing Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Limited Liver Resections of the Posterosuperior Segments: An International Multicenter Study.倾向评分匹配分析比较后上段有限肝切除术的机器人手术与腹腔镜手术：一项国际多中心研究。
Ann Surg. 2024 Feb 1;279(2):297-305. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000006027. Epub 2023 Jul 24.
6
Laparoscopic versus open parenchymal preserving liver resections in the posterosuperior segments (ORANGE Segments): a multicentre, single-blind, randomised controlled trial.腹腔镜与开放保留实质的肝后上段（橙色段）肝切除术：一项多中心、单盲、随机对照试验
Lancet Reg Health Eur. 2025 Feb 20;51:101228. doi: 10.1016/j.lanepe.2025.101228. eCollection 2025 Apr.
7
Laparoscopic versus open parenchymal preserving liver resections in the posterosuperior segments: a case-matched study.腹腔镜与开腹保肝实质肝切除术在后上叶段：病例匹配研究。
Surg Endosc. 2018 Mar;32(3):1478-1485. doi: 10.1007/s00464-017-5835-z. Epub 2017 Sep 15.
8
Hand-Assisted Laparoscopic Surgery Is Superior to Open Liver Resection for Colorectal Liver Metastases in the Posterosuperior Segments.对于后上段的结直肠癌肝转移，手辅助腹腔镜手术优于开腹肝切除术。
Front Surg. 2021 Nov 25;8:746427. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2021.746427. eCollection 2021.
9
Laparoscopic or open approaches for posterosuperior and anterolateral liver resections? A propensity score based analysis of the degree of advantage.腹腔镜与开腹手术在后上及前外侧肝切除术的应用？基于倾向评分的优势程度分析。
HPB (Oxford). 2019 Dec;21(12):1676-1686. doi: 10.1016/j.hpb.2019.05.006. Epub 2019 Jun 14.
10
The differential benefit of laparoscopic over open minor liver resection for lesions situated in the anterolateral or posterosuperior segments.对于位于前外侧或后上段的病变，腹腔镜下小肝切除术相对于开腹小肝切除术的差异获益。
Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr. 2024 Aug 1;13(4):604-615. doi: 10.21037/hbsn-23-494. Epub 2024 Jul 4.

本文引用的文献

1
Laparoscopic versus open parenchymal preserving liver resections in the posterosuperior segments (ORANGE Segments): a multicentre, single-blind, randomised controlled trial.腹腔镜与开放保留实质的肝后上段（橙色段）肝切除术：一项多中心、单盲、随机对照试验
Lancet Reg Health Eur. 2025 Feb 20;51:101228. doi: 10.1016/j.lanepe.2025.101228. eCollection 2025 Apr.
2
Optimal results through enhanced recovery: Achieving textbook outcomes with high compliance in elective liver surgery.通过强化康复实现最佳效果：在择期肝手术中实现高依从性的教科书式结果。
World J Surg. 2024 Nov;48(11):2736-2748. doi: 10.1002/wjs.12345. Epub 2024 Oct 10.
3
Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Guidelines and Hospital Length of Stay, Readmission, Complications, and Mortality: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials.术后恢复加速指南与住院时间、再入院率、并发症和死亡率：一项随机临床试验的荟萃分析。
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Jun 3;7(6):e2417310. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.17310.
4
Laparoscopic Versus Open Hemihepatectomy: The ORANGE II PLUS Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial.腹腔镜与开腹半肝切除术的比较：ORANGE II PLUS 多中心随机对照试验。
J Clin Oncol. 2024 May 20;42(15):1799-1809. doi: 10.1200/JCO.23.01019. Epub 2024 Apr 19.
5
Guidelines for Perioperative Care for Liver Surgery: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Society Recommendations 2022.肝脏手术围手术期护理指南：加速康复外科（ERAS）协会 2022 年推荐意见。
World J Surg. 2023 Jan;47(1):11-34. doi: 10.1007/s00268-022-06732-5. Epub 2022 Oct 30.
6
The impact of enhanced recovery program compliance after elective liver surgery: Results from a multicenter prospective national registry.择期肝手术后增强康复计划依从性的影响：来自多中心前瞻性全国注册研究的结果。
Surgery. 2021 Nov;170(5):1457-1466. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2021.05.036. Epub 2021 Jun 25.
7
Definition and Prospective Assessment of Functional Recovery After Liver Transplantation: A New Objective Consensus-Based Metric for Safe Discharge.肝移植后功能恢复的定义和前瞻性评估：一种新的基于共识的客观指标，用于安全出院。
Liver Transpl. 2020 Oct;26(10):1241-1253. doi: 10.1002/lt.25841. Epub 2020 Aug 25.
8
Randomized clinical trial of open versus laparoscopic left lateral hepatic sectionectomy within an enhanced recovery after surgery programme (ORANGE II study).开放与腹腔镜左半肝切除术在加速康复外科方案中的随机临床试验（ORANGE II 研究）。
Br J Surg. 2017 Apr;104(5):525-535. doi: 10.1002/bjs.10438. Epub 2017 Jan 31.
9
Enhanced Recovery After Surgery: A Review.术后加速康复：综述。
JAMA Surg. 2017 Mar 1;152(3):292-298. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2016.4952.