Randolph Nina K, Salerno Matthew, Klein Hannah, Diaz-Campos Dubraska, van Balen Joany C, Winston Jenessa A
Department of Veterinary Clinical Sciences. College of Veterinary Medicine, The Ohio State University. Columbus, Ohio, United States of America.
Comparative Hepatobiliary and Intestinal Research Program, College of Veterinary Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, United States of America.
PLoS One. 2025 Apr 9;20(4):e0319161. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0319161. eCollection 2025.
Fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) is increasingly utilized in small animal medicine for the treatment of a variety of gastrointestinal and non-gastrointestinal disorders. Despite proven clinical efficacy, there is no detailed protocol available for the preparation and storage of FMT products for veterinarians in a variety of clinical settings. Herein, the effect of processing technique on the microbial community structure was assessed with amplicon sequence analysis. Microbial viability was assessed with standard culture techniques using selective media. Given the fastidious nature of many intestinal microbes, colony forming units are considered surrogate viable microbes, representing a portion of potentially viable microbes. FMT products from four screened canine fecal donors and six screened feline fecal donors were processed aerobically according to a double centrifugation protocol adapted from the human medical literature. Fresh feces from an additional three screened canine fecal donors were used to evaluate the effect of cryopreservative, centrifugation, and short-term storage on microbial community structure and in vitro surrogate bacterial viability. Finally, fresh feces from a third group of three screened canine and three screened feline fecal donors were used to evaluate the long-term in vitro surrogate bacterial viability of three frozen and lyophilized FMT products. Microbiota analysis revealed that each canine fecal donor has a unique microbial profile. Processing of canine and feline feces for FMT does not significantly alter the overall microbial community structure. The addition of cryopreservatives and lyopreservatives significantly improved long-term viability, up to 6 months, for frozen and lyophilized FMT products compared to unprocessed raw feces with no cryopreservative. These results prove the practicality of this approach for FMT preparation in veterinary medicine and provide a detailed protocol for researchers and companion animal practitioners. Future in vivo research is needed to evaluate how the preparation and microbial viability of FMT impacts the recipient's microbial community and clinical outcomes across multiple disease phenotypes.
粪便微生物群移植(FMT)在小动物医学中越来越多地用于治疗各种胃肠道和非胃肠道疾病。尽管已证实其临床疗效,但在各种临床环境中,尚无针对兽医的FMT产品制备和储存的详细方案。在此,通过扩增子序列分析评估了处理技术对微生物群落结构的影响。使用选择性培养基的标准培养技术评估微生物活力。鉴于许多肠道微生物的苛求性,菌落形成单位被视为替代活微生物,代表了一部分潜在的活微生物。根据从人类医学文献改编的双重离心方案,对来自四名经筛选的犬类粪便供体和六名经筛选的猫类粪便供体的FMT产品进行需氧处理。使用另外三名经筛选的犬类粪便供体的新鲜粪便来评估冷冻保护剂、离心和短期储存对微生物群落结构和体外替代细菌活力的影响。最后,使用来自第三组三名经筛选的犬类和三名经筛选的猫类粪便供体的新鲜粪便来评估三种冷冻和冻干FMT产品的长期体外替代细菌活力。微生物群分析表明,每个犬类粪便供体都有独特的微生物谱。用于FMT的犬类和猫类粪便处理不会显著改变整体微生物群落结构。与未添加冷冻保护剂的未处理原始粪便相比,添加冷冻保护剂和冻干保护剂显著提高了冷冻和冻干FMT产品长达6个月的长期活力。这些结果证明了这种方法在兽医学中制备FMT的实用性,并为研究人员和伴侣动物从业者提供了详细方案。未来需要进行体内研究,以评估FMT的制备和微生物活力如何影响受体的微生物群落以及多种疾病表型的临床结果。