• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

利用腹腔镜和开放手术入路比较肝Ⅶ段和Ⅷ段部分肝切除术的手术难度

Comparison of the surgical difficulty between segment 7 and 8 partial liver resection untilizing the laparoscopic and open approaches.

作者信息

Gon Hidetoshi, Fujisawa Akihiro, Komatsu Shohei, Tanaka Motofumi, Fukushima Kenji, Urade Takeshi, Yoshida Toshihiko, Arai Keisuke, Ishida Jun, Nanno Yoshihide, Tsugawa Daisuke, Yanagimoto Hiroaki, Toyama Hirochika, Kido Masahiro, Fukumoto Takumi

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Division of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, 7 - 5- 2 Kusunoki-Cho, Chuo-Ku, Kobe, Hyogo, 650 - 0017, Japan.

Department of Surgery, Hyogo Cancer Center, Akashi, Hyogo, Japan.

出版信息

Surg Today. 2025 Apr 9. doi: 10.1007/s00595-025-03037-7.

DOI:10.1007/s00595-025-03037-7
PMID:40205135
Abstract

PURPOSE

We aimed to investigate the differences in surgical difficulty between laparoscopic partial liver resections of segments 7 and 8.

METHODS

We analyzed 173 patients who underwent partial liver resections of segments 7 or 8 between 2010 and 2022 at two institutions. We investigated differences in the surgical outcomes of each procedure using propensity score matching. We compared these outcomes with those of open partial liver resections for segments 7 and 8 to determine whether the differences were unique to the laparoscopic approach.

RESULTS

Thirty and 54 patients underwent laparoscopic partial liver resections of segments 7 and 8. In the matched cohort (22 in each group), the operation time was significantly longer (377 vs. 278 min, P = 0.020) and the proportion of postoperative complications significantly higher in segment 7 (27% vs. 0%, P = 0.008). Forty-one and 48 patients underwent open partial liver resections of segments 7 and 8, respectively. There were no significant differences in the surgical outcomes between the segments in the matched cohort (20 in each group).

CONCLUSIONS

Laparoscopic partial liver resections of segment 7 may be more challenging than that of segment 8. This difference in difficulty was not observed in open partial liver resections.

摘要

目的

我们旨在研究腹腔镜下肝段7和肝段8部分肝切除术的手术难度差异。

方法

我们分析了2010年至2022年期间在两家机构接受肝段7或肝段8部分肝切除术的173例患者。我们使用倾向评分匹配法研究了每种手术的手术结果差异。我们将这些结果与肝段7和肝段8的开放性部分肝切除术的结果进行比较,以确定这些差异是否是腹腔镜手术方法所特有的。

结果

30例和54例患者分别接受了腹腔镜下肝段7和肝段8部分肝切除术。在匹配队列(每组22例)中,肝段7的手术时间明显更长(377分钟对278分钟,P = 0.020),术后并发症发生率明显更高(27%对0%,P = 0.008)。41例和48例患者分别接受了肝段7和肝段8的开放性部分肝切除术。在匹配队列(每组20例)中,各肝段之间的手术结果无显著差异。

结论

腹腔镜下肝段7部分肝切除术可能比肝段8更具挑战性。在开放性部分肝切除术中未观察到这种难度差异。

相似文献

1
Comparison of the surgical difficulty between segment 7 and 8 partial liver resection untilizing the laparoscopic and open approaches.利用腹腔镜和开放手术入路比较肝Ⅶ段和Ⅷ段部分肝切除术的手术难度
Surg Today. 2025 Apr 9. doi: 10.1007/s00595-025-03037-7.
2
Robotic versus laparoscopic resections of posterosuperior segments of the liver: a propensity score-matched comparison.机器人手术与腹腔镜手术治疗肝后上段切除术:倾向评分匹配比较
Surg Endosc. 2016 Mar;30(3):1004-13. doi: 10.1007/s00464-015-4284-9. Epub 2015 Jun 27.
3
Comparison between the difficulty of laparoscopic limited liver resections of tumors located in segment 7 versus segment 8: An international multicenter propensity-score matched study.比较位于第 7 段和第 8 段的肿瘤的腹腔镜局限性肝切除术的难度:一项国际多中心倾向评分匹配研究。
J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2023 Feb;30(2):177-191. doi: 10.1002/jhbp.1210. Epub 2022 Jul 20.
4
Suitability of Laparoscopic Liver Resection of Segment VII: a Retrospective Two-Center Study.腹腔镜肝 VII 段切除术的适宜性:一项回顾性的双中心研究。
J Gastrointest Surg. 2022 Nov;26(11):2274-2281. doi: 10.1007/s11605-022-05389-8. Epub 2022 Jun 17.
5
Comparison of laparoscopic versus open liver tumor resection: a case-controlled study.腹腔镜与开腹肝肿瘤切除术的比较:一项病例对照研究。
Surg Endosc. 2009 Apr;23(4):847-53. doi: 10.1007/s00464-008-0262-9. Epub 2008 Dec 31.
6
An international multicenter propensity-score matched and coarsened-exact matched analysis comparing robotic versus laparoscopic partial liver resections of the anterolateral segments.国际多中心倾向评分匹配和粗糙精确匹配分析比较机器人与腹腔镜前外侧肝段部分切除术。
J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2022 Aug;29(8):843-854. doi: 10.1002/jhbp.1149. Epub 2022 Apr 27.
7
Laparoscopic resection reduces superficial surgical site infection in liver surgery.腹腔镜切除术可降低肝脏手术中表浅手术部位感染的发生率。
Surg Endosc. 2021 Dec;35(12):7131-7141. doi: 10.1007/s00464-020-08233-9. Epub 2021 Jan 4.
8
Laparoscopic versus open parenchymal preserving liver resections in the posterosuperior segments: a case-matched study.腹腔镜与开腹保肝实质肝切除术在后上叶段:病例匹配研究。
Surg Endosc. 2018 Mar;32(3):1478-1485. doi: 10.1007/s00464-017-5835-z. Epub 2017 Sep 15.
9
The differential benefit of laparoscopic over open minor liver resection for lesions situated in the anterolateral or posterosuperior segments.对于位于前外侧或后上段的病变,腹腔镜下小肝切除术相对于开腹小肝切除术的差异获益。
Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr. 2024 Aug 1;13(4):604-615. doi: 10.21037/hbsn-23-494. Epub 2024 Jul 4.
10
A Comparison of Laparoscopic Surgery and Open Surgery in Liver Resections: A Single-Center Experience.肝切除术中腹腔镜手术与开放手术的比较:单中心经验
Eurasian J Med. 2023 Oct;55(3):234-238. doi: 10.5152/eurasianjmed.2023.23119.

本文引用的文献

1
Comparison of laparoscopic liver resection for the ventral versus the dorsal areas of segment 8.比较腹腔镜肝切除术治疗第 8 段腹侧和背侧区域。
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2024 Aug 7;409(1):243. doi: 10.1007/s00423-024-03435-4.
2
Surgical Resection in Colorectal Liver Metastasis: An Umbrella Review.结直肠癌肝转移的手术切除:一项伞状综述
Cancers (Basel). 2024 May 12;16(10):1849. doi: 10.3390/cancers16101849.
3
Impact of liver cirrhosis and portal hypertension on minimally invasive limited liver resection for primary liver malignancies in the posterosuperior segments: An international multicenter study.
肝硬化和门静脉高压对后上段原发性肝癌微创局限性肝切除术的影响:一项国际多中心研究。
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2023 Oct;49(10):106997. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2023.106997. Epub 2023 Aug 6.
4
Efficacy and safety of laparoscopic liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma in segment 8: a propensity score-matched two-center study.腹腔镜肝切除术治疗肝右前叶肝细胞癌的疗效与安全性:一项倾向评分匹配的双中心研究
Surg Endosc. 2023 Nov;37(11):8438-8446. doi: 10.1007/s00464-023-10291-8. Epub 2023 Jul 18.
5
Suitability of Laparoscopic Liver Resection of Segment VII: a Retrospective Two-Center Study.腹腔镜肝 VII 段切除术的适宜性:一项回顾性的双中心研究。
J Gastrointest Surg. 2022 Nov;26(11):2274-2281. doi: 10.1007/s11605-022-05389-8. Epub 2022 Jun 17.
6
Performance of a modified three-level classification in stratifying open liver resection procedures in terms of complexity and postoperative morbidity.改良三级分类在预测开腹肝切除手术复杂性和术后发病率方面的性能。
Br J Surg. 2020 Feb;107(3):258-267. doi: 10.1002/bjs.11351. Epub 2019 Oct 11.
7
Validation of index-based IWATE criteria as an improved difficulty scoring system for laparoscopic liver resection.基于指数的 IWATE 标准作为腹腔镜肝切除术改良难度评分系统的验证。
Surgery. 2019 Apr;165(4):731-740. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2018.10.012. Epub 2018 Nov 13.
8
Development and validation of a difficulty score to predict intraoperative complications during laparoscopic liver resection.开发并验证一种难度评分系统,以预测腹腔镜肝切除术中的术中并发症。
Br J Surg. 2018 Aug;105(9):1182-1191. doi: 10.1002/bjs.10821. Epub 2018 May 8.
9
The Southampton Consensus Guidelines for Laparoscopic Liver Surgery: From Indication to Implementation.《南安普敦腹腔镜肝手术共识指南:从适应证到实施》。
Ann Surg. 2018 Jul;268(1):11-18. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002524.
10
A novel model for prediction of pure laparoscopic liver resection surgical difficulty.一种用于预测纯腹腔镜肝切除术手术难度的新模型。
Surg Endosc. 2017 Dec;31(12):5356-5363. doi: 10.1007/s00464-017-5616-8. Epub 2017 Jun 7.