Nymark Penny, Clerbaux Laure-Alix, Amorim Maria-João, Andronis Christos, de Bernardi Francesca, Bezemer Gillina F G, Coecke Sandra, Gavins Felicity N E, Jacobson Daniel, Lekka Eftychia, Margiotta-Casaluci Luigi, Martens Marvin, Mayasich Sally A, Mortensen Holly M, Kim Young Jun, Sachana Magdalini, Tanabe Shihori, Virvilis Vassilis, Edwards Stephen W, Halappanavar Sabina
Institute of Environmental Medicine, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden.
Institute of Clinical and Experimental Research (IREC), UCLouvain, Brussels, Belgium.
Front Syst Biol. 2024 Jun 6;4:1384481. doi: 10.3389/fsysb.2024.1384481.
The COVID-19 pandemic generated large amounts of data on the disease pathogenesis leading to a need for organizing the vast knowledge in a succinct manner. Between April 2020 and February 2023, the CIAO consortium exploited the Adverse Outcome Pathway (AOP) framework to comprehensively gather and systematically organize published scientific literature on COVID-19 pathology. The project considered 24 pathways relevant for COVID-19 by identifying essential key events (KEs) leading to 19 adverse outcomes observed in patients. While an individual AOP defines causally linked perturbed KEs towards an outcome, building an AOP network visually reflect the interrelatedness of the various pathways and outcomes. In this study, 17 of those COVID-19 AOPs were selected based on quality criteria to computationally derive an AOP network. This primary network highlighted the need to consider tissue specificity and helped to identify missing or redundant elements which were then manually implemented in the final network. Such a network enabled visualization of the complex interactions of the KEs leading to the various outcomes of the multifaceted COVID-19 and confirmed the central role of the inflammatory response in the disease. In addition, this study disclosed the importance of terminology harmonization and of tissue/organ specificity for network building. Furthermore the unequal completeness and quality of information contained in the AOPs highlighted the need for tighter implementation of the FAIR principles to improve AOP findability, accessibility, interoperability and re-usability. Finally, the study underlined that describing KEs specific to SARS-CoV-2 replication and discriminating physiological from pathological inflammation is necessary but requires adaptations to the framework. Hence, based on the challenges encountered, we proposed recommendations relevant for ongoing and future AOP-aligned consortia aiming to build computationally biologically meaningful AOP networks in the context of, but not limited to, viral diseases.
新冠疫情产生了大量关于该疾病发病机制的数据,因此需要以简洁的方式整理这些海量知识。在2020年4月至2023年2月期间,CIAO联盟利用不良结局途径(AOP)框架,全面收集并系统整理了已发表的关于新冠病理的科学文献。该项目通过确定导致患者出现19种不良结局的关键事件(KEs),考虑了与新冠相关的24条途径。虽然单个AOP定义了导致某种结局的因果相关的扰动KEs,但构建一个AOP网络能直观地反映各种途径和结局的相互关联性。在本研究中,基于质量标准从这些新冠AOP中选择了17个,以通过计算得出一个AOP网络。这个初级网络凸显了考虑组织特异性的必要性,并有助于识别缺失或冗余的元素,这些元素随后在最终网络中手动添加。这样一个网络能够可视化导致多方面新冠各种结局的KEs的复杂相互作用,并证实了炎症反应在该疾病中的核心作用。此外,本研究揭示了术语协调以及组织/器官特异性对于网络构建的重要性。此外,AOP中所含信息的完整性和质量参差不齐,这凸显了更严格实施FAIR原则以提高AOP的可发现性、可访问性、互操作性和可再利用性的必要性。最后,该研究强调,描述特定于SARS-CoV-2复制的KEs以及区分生理性炎症和病理性炎症是必要的,但需要对该框架进行调整。因此,基于所遇到的挑战,我们针对正在进行和未来旨在在不限于病毒性疾病的背景下构建具有计算生物学意义的AOP网络的AOP对齐联盟提出了相关建议。