• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Stress, Employment Changes, and Psychological Distress Among Caregivers of Patients With Head and Neck Cancer.头颈癌患者照料者的压力、就业变化与心理困扰
JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2025 Apr 10. doi: 10.1001/jamaoto.2025.0131.
2
Home treatment for mental health problems: a systematic review.心理健康问题的居家治疗:一项系统综述
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(15):1-139. doi: 10.3310/hta5150.
3
Nutritional interventions for survivors of childhood cancer.儿童癌症幸存者的营养干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Aug 22;2016(8):CD009678. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009678.pub2.
4
How lived experiences of illness trajectories, burdens of treatment, and social inequalities shape service user and caregiver participation in health and social care: a theory-informed qualitative evidence synthesis.疾病轨迹的生活经历、治疗负担和社会不平等如何影响服务使用者和照顾者参与健康和社会护理:一项基于理论的定性证据综合分析
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025 Jun;13(24):1-120. doi: 10.3310/HGTQ8159.
5
Falls prevention interventions for community-dwelling older adults: systematic review and meta-analysis of benefits, harms, and patient values and preferences.社区居住的老年人跌倒预防干预措施:系统评价和荟萃分析的益处、危害以及患者的价值观和偏好。
Syst Rev. 2024 Nov 26;13(1):289. doi: 10.1186/s13643-024-02681-3.
6
": A Mixed Methods Investigation of Employment, Stigma, and Financial Hardship Among LGBTQ+ Cancer Caregivers.《LGBTQ+癌症护理者的就业、耻辱感和经济困难的混合方法调查》
Cancer Control. 2025 Jan-Dec;32:10732748251351105. doi: 10.1177/10732748251351105. Epub 2025 Jun 14.
7
Survivor, family and professional experiences of psychosocial interventions for sexual abuse and violence: a qualitative evidence synthesis.性虐待和暴力的心理社会干预的幸存者、家庭和专业人员的经验:定性证据综合。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Oct 4;10(10):CD013648. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013648.pub2.
8
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.系统性药理学治疗慢性斑块状银屑病:网络荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Apr 19;4(4):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub4.
9
Development of a Mobile App to Support Head and Neck Cancer Caregiving: Mixed Methods Study.开发一款支持头颈癌护理的移动应用程序:混合方法研究。
JMIR Cancer. 2025 Jun 10;11:e66471. doi: 10.2196/66471.
10
Specialist breast care nurses for support of women with breast cancer.专科乳腺护理护士为乳腺癌女性提供支持。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Feb 3;2(2):CD005634. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005634.pub3.

本文引用的文献

1
Longitudinal Analysis of Caregiver Burden in Head and Neck Cancer.头颈部癌症患者照顾者负担的纵向分析。
JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2023 Aug 1;149(8):681-689. doi: 10.1001/jamaoto.2023.1283.
2
Untangling the role of social relationships in the association between caregiver burden and caregiver health: an observational study exploring three coping models of the stress process paradigm.解开社会关系在照顾者负担与照顾者健康之间关联中的作用:探索压力过程范式三种应对模型的观察性研究。
BMC Public Health. 2022 Sep 13;22(1):1737. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-14127-3.
3
Psychosocial Distress of Head Neck Cancer (HNC) Patients Receiving Radiotherapy: A Systematic Review.头颈部癌症(HNC)患者接受放疗的心理社会困扰:系统评价。
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2022 Jun 1;23(6):1827-1835. doi: 10.31557/APJCP.2022.23.6.1827.
4
Health and Well-Being Needs Among Head and Neck Cancer Caregivers - A Systematic Review.头颈部癌症照顾者的健康和福祉需求——系统评价。
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2023 Apr;132(4):449-459. doi: 10.1177/00034894221088180. Epub 2022 May 12.
5
Conceptualizing How Caregiving Relationships Connect to Quality of Family Caregiving within the Stress Process Model.概念化照护关系如何通过压力过程模型与家庭照护质量联系起来。
J Gerontol Soc Work. 2022 Aug-Sep;65(6):635-648. doi: 10.1080/01634372.2021.2010855. Epub 2021 Dec 1.
6
Predictive model of psychological distress in family caregivers of patients with cancer: a cross-sectional study.癌症患者家属心理困扰的预测模型:一项横断面研究。
Support Care Cancer. 2021 Sep;29(9):5091-5101. doi: 10.1007/s00520-021-06022-1. Epub 2021 Feb 17.
7
Depression, anxiety, fatigue, and quality of life in a large sample of patients suffering from head and neck cancer in comparison with the general population.在一个大型的头颈部癌症患者样本中,与一般人群相比,这些患者存在抑郁、焦虑、疲劳和生活质量问题。
BMC Cancer. 2021 Jan 22;21(1):94. doi: 10.1186/s12885-020-07773-6.
8
Source of Social Support and Caregiving Self-Efficacy on Caregiver Burden and Patient's Quality of Life: A Path Analysis on Patients with Palliative Care Needs and Their Caregivers.社会支持和照顾自我效能感对照顾者负担和患者生活质量的影响:对有姑息治疗需求的患者及其照顾者的路径分析。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Jul 29;17(15):5457. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17155457.
9
Cancer Caregiving While Employed: Caregiving Roles, Employment Adjustments, Employer Assistance, and Preferences for Support.癌症患者的就业照护:照护角色、就业调整、雇主援助和支持偏好。
J Cancer Educ. 2021 Oct;36(5):920-932. doi: 10.1007/s13187-019-01674-4.
10
Social support as predictor of anxiety and depression in cancer caregivers six months after cancer diagnosis: A longitudinal study.癌症诊断后六个月癌症照顾者焦虑和抑郁的预测因素:一项纵向研究。
J Clin Nurs. 2020 Mar;29(5-6):996-1002. doi: 10.1111/jocn.15123. Epub 2020 Jan 14.

头颈癌患者照料者的压力、就业变化与心理困扰

Stress, Employment Changes, and Psychological Distress Among Caregivers of Patients With Head and Neck Cancer.

作者信息

Abdurrahman Lama, Sandulache Vlad C, Reyes-Gibby Cielito, Sturgis Erich M, Jhaveri Pavan, Badr Hoda

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas.

Bobby R. Alford Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas.

出版信息

JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2025 Apr 10. doi: 10.1001/jamaoto.2025.0131.

DOI:10.1001/jamaoto.2025.0131
PMID:40208574
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11986827/
Abstract

IMPORTANCE

Patients undergoing external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) for head and neck cancer (HNC) often experience adverse effects that require substantial caregiving. The burdens of caregiving can impact caregiver employment and mental health over time, yet this topic remains underexplored.

OBJECTIVE

To examine the associations between caregiving for patients with HNC who undergo EBRT and caregiver stress, employment status, and psychological distress.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This was a secondary analysis of data from a longitudinal survey study that surveyed caregivers at baseline (ie, at initiation of EBRT) and at 4-month and 12-month follow-ups. The study was conducted at 2 comprehensive cancer centers in Houston, Texas, and New York, New York, and included patients with HNC who had undergone EBRT and their caregivers. Data were collected from September 1, 2009, to August 31, 2014, and were analyzed from June 1, 2024, to August 31, 2024.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

The primary outcomes included caregiver employment status and psychological distress level, the latter of which was measured using the Brief Symptom Inventory-18 (BSI-18) for general distress and the Impact of Event Scale-Revised (IES-R) for cancer-specific distress.

RESULTS

The study included 188 caregivers, 159 (84.6%) of whom were female; the mean (SD) age for all caregivers was 54.6 (10.4) years. At baseline, 53 caregivers (28.2%) met BSI-18 criteria for general distress, and 85 (45.2%) met IES-R criteria for cancer-specific distress. By the 12-month follow-up, these rates decreased to 16 of 112 (14.3%) and 30 of 112 (26.8%), respectively. Caregivers were 40% less likely to be employed full-time at the 4-month follow-up (odds ratio, 0.60 [95% CI, 0.48-0.75]), and this reduction persisted with a 41% lower likelihood of full-time employment at the 12-month follow-up (odds ratio, 0.59 [95% CI, 0.47-0.74]). Caregivers who reduced their work hours or exited the workforce during the entire study period (n = 48 [25.5%]) reported higher levels of general distress (β = 4.02 [95% CI, 0.65-7.39]). Furthermore, greater role captivity (β = 5.37 [95% CI, 2.12-8.63]) and lower caregiving competence (β = -3.84 [95% CI, -6.21 to -1.47]) were associated with elevated levels of both general distress and cancer-specific distress.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

The findings of this survey study suggest that caregiving for patients with HNC undergoing EBRT may be associated with lower employment rates and poorer mental health among caregivers. Integrating caregivers into multidisciplinary HNC care to identify those at risk and connecting them to timely employment-based interventions such as flexible work arrangements and caregiver leave, as well as community-based support services such as counseling and social network-building, could help alleviate the dual burden of employment strain and psychological distress, benefiting both caregivers and patients.

摘要

重要性

接受头颈部癌(HNC)外照射放疗(EBRT)的患者常经历需要大量护理的不良反应。随着时间的推移,护理负担可能会影响护理人员的就业和心理健康,但这一主题仍未得到充分探索。

目的

研究对头颈部癌接受外照射放疗患者的护理与护理人员压力、就业状况和心理困扰之间的关联。

设计、背景和参与者:这是一项对纵向调查研究数据的二次分析,该研究在基线(即外照射放疗开始时)以及4个月和12个月随访时对护理人员进行调查。该研究在得克萨斯州休斯敦和纽约市的2家综合癌症中心进行,纳入了接受外照射放疗的头颈部癌患者及其护理人员。数据收集时间为2009年9月1日至2014年8月31日,并于2024年6月1日至2024年8月31日进行分析。

主要结局和测量指标

主要结局包括护理人员的就业状况和心理困扰水平,后者使用简明症状量表-18(BSI-18)测量一般困扰,使用事件影响量表修订版(IES-R)测量特定癌症困扰。

结果

该研究纳入了188名护理人员,其中159名(84.6%)为女性;所有护理人员的平均(标准差)年龄为54.6(10.4)岁。在基线时,53名护理人员(28.2%)符合BSI-18一般困扰标准,85名(45.2%)符合IES-R特定癌症困扰标准。到12个月随访时,这些比例分别降至112名中的16名(14.3%)和112名中的30名(26.8%)。在4个月随访时,护理人员全职就业的可能性降低了40%(优势比,0.60[95%置信区间,0.48 - 0.75]),这种降低在12个月随访时持续存在,全职就业可能性降低了41%(优势比,0.59[95%置信区间,0.47 - 0.74])。在整个研究期间减少工作时间或退出劳动力市场的护理人员(n = 48[25.5%])报告的一般困扰水平更高(β = 4.02[95%置信区间,0.65 - 7.39])。此外,更大的角色受限感(β = 5.37[95%置信区间,2.12 - 8.63])和更低的护理能力(β = -3.84[95%置信区间,-6.21至-1.47])与一般困扰和特定癌症困扰水平升高相关。

结论和意义

这项调查研究的结果表明,对头颈部癌接受外照射放疗患者的护理可能与护理人员较低的就业率和较差的心理健康相关。将护理人员纳入多学科头颈部癌护理,以识别有风险的人员,并将他们与及时的基于就业的干预措施(如灵活的工作安排和护理人员休假)以及基于社区的支持服务(如咨询和社交网络建设)联系起来,可能有助于减轻就业压力和心理困扰的双重负担,使护理人员和患者都受益。