Wang Jennifer M, Bose Swaraj, Murray Susan, Labaki Wassim W, Kazerooni Ella A, Chung Jonathan H, Flaherty Kevin R, Han MeiLan K, Hatt Charles R, Oldham Justin M
Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine.
Department of Biostatistics, and.
Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2025 Sep;22(9):1314-1320. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.202410-1048OC.
Incidental features of interstitial lung disease (ILD) are commonly observed on chest computed tomography (CT) scans and are independently associated with poor outcomes. Although most studies to date have relied on qualitative assessments of ILD, quantitative imaging algorithms have the potential to effectively detect ILD and assist in risk stratification for population-based cohorts. To determine whether quantitative measures of ILD are associated with clinically relevant outcomes in the NLST (National Lung Screening Trial). Quantitative measures of ILD were generated using low-dose CT (LDCT) data collected as part of the NLST and processed with Computer-Aided Lung Informatics for Pathology Evaluation and Ratings (CALIPER) and deep learning-based usual interstitial pneumonia (DL-UIP) algorithms (Imbio Inc.). A multivariable Cox proportional hazard regression model was used to test the association between ILD measures (percentage ground-glass opacity, reticular opacity, and honeycombing of total lung volume and binary DL-UIP classification) and all-cause mortality. Secondary outcomes of incident lung cancer and lung cancer mortality were also explored. Quantitative CT data were generated in 11,518 individuals. Mean age was 61.5 years, and 58.7% were male. An increased risk of all-cause mortality was observed for each percentage increase in CALIPER-derived ground-glass opacity (hazard ratio [HR], 1.02; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.01-1.02), reticular opacity (HR, 1.18; 95% CI, 1.12-1.24), and honeycombing (HR, 6.23; 95% CI, 4.23-9.16). Individuals with a positive DL-UIP classification pattern had a 4.8-fold increased risk of all-cause mortality (HR, 4.75; 95% CI, 2.50-9.04). CALIPER-derived reticular opacity was also associated with increased lung cancer-specific mortality. No quantitative measures of ILD were associated with incident lung cancer. Quantitative measures of ILD on LDCT are associated with clinically relevant endpoints in a large at-risk population of individuals with tobacco use history.
间质性肺疾病(ILD)的偶然特征在胸部计算机断层扫描(CT)中很常见,且与不良预后独立相关。尽管迄今为止大多数研究依赖于对ILD的定性评估,但定量成像算法有潜力有效检测ILD并协助基于人群队列的风险分层。为了确定NLST(国家肺癌筛查试验)中ILD的定量测量是否与临床相关结局相关。使用作为NLST一部分收集的低剂量CT(LDCT)数据生成ILD的定量测量,并使用计算机辅助肺信息病理学评估和评级(CALIPER)和基于深度学习的普通间质性肺炎(DL-UIP)算法(Imbio公司)进行处理。使用多变量Cox比例风险回归模型来测试ILD测量(磨玻璃影百分比、网状影、全肺容积蜂窝状改变以及二元DL-UIP分类)与全因死亡率之间的关联。还探讨了肺癌发病和肺癌死亡率的次要结局。在11518名个体中生成了定量CT数据。平均年龄为61.5岁,58.7%为男性。CALIPER衍生的磨玻璃影每增加一个百分点,全因死亡风险增加(风险比[HR],1.02;95%置信区间[CI],1.01 - 1.02),网状影(HR,1.18;95% CI,1.12 - 1.24)和蜂窝状改变(HR,6.23;95% CI,4.23 - 9.16)。DL-UIP分类模式为阳性的个体全因死亡风险增加4.8倍(HR,4.75;95% CI,2.50 - 9.04)。CALIPER衍生的网状影也与肺癌特异性死亡率增加相关。ILD的定量测量与肺癌发病无关。LDCT上ILD的定量测量与有吸烟史的大量高危人群的临床相关终点相关。