• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

系统性红斑狼疮症状聚类分析的预后见解

Prognostic insights from symptom clustering analysis in systemic lupus erythematosus.

作者信息

Le Tallec Erwan, Bourg Corentin, Bouzillé Guillaume, Belhomme Nicolas, Le Pabic Estelle, Guillot Stéphanie, Droitcourt Catherine, Perlat Antoinette, Jouneau Stéphane, Sobanski Vincent, Donal Erwan, Lescoat Alain

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine and Clinical Immunology, CHU de Rennes, Rennes, France

Department of Cardiology, CHU de Rennes, Rennes, Bretagne, France.

出版信息

RMD Open. 2025 Apr 9;11(2):e005330. doi: 10.1136/rmdopen-2024-005330.

DOI:10.1136/rmdopen-2024-005330
PMID:40210260
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11987115/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), a systemic autoimmune disease with heterogeneous severity, poses a challenge in classifying patients due to its dynamic phenotype. We therefore aimed to identify clinical clusters at diagnosis and at the last available visit to define subgroups with different disease trajectories.

METHODS

This retrospective study included 278 SLE patients fulfilling the 2019 EULAR/American College of Rheumatology classification criteria. Data were extracted from the patient's medical record, encompassing demographic, clinical and immunological features. Two hierarchical clustering analyses were performed: one at diagnosis and the other at the last available visit based on 23 clinical manifestations. We assessed the distribution of autoantibodies among clusters, and survival analyses compared prognosis using the Cox regression model.

RESULTS

Three symptom clusters were identified at diagnosis and confirmed at the last available visit, with consistent clinical profiles. The largest, clusters 1/1', exhibited early articular (95.3%; p=0.0043) and mucocutaneous (58.7%; p=0.0031) symptoms with the best survival rate. Clusters 2/2' displayed the most severe phenotype, including renal involvement (62.2%; p<0.0001), positivity for anti-DNA (90.0%; p=0.0151) and anti-Sm (34.4%; p<0.0001) autoantibodies, and worse prognosis. Clusters 3/3' exhibited a high proportion of SLE patients fulfilling the definition of mixed connective tissue disease (MCTD) (50.0%; p<0.0001) with anti-U1-RNP 70 kDa autoantibodies (87.5%; p<0.0001). Clusters 1 and 2 remained stable during follow-up, cluster 2 even expanding over time, while over half of cluster 3 patients transitioned to a different subgroup.

CONCLUSION

We identified a distinct MCTD phenotype within SLE patients, a severe SLE phenotype with poor prognosis, and a third group of SLE patients with lower visceral involvement. Clusters remained stable over time, providing insights into disease progression.

摘要

目的

系统性红斑狼疮(SLE)是一种严重程度各异的全身性自身免疫性疾病,因其动态表型,在患者分类方面构成挑战。因此,我们旨在确定诊断时和最后一次可获得随访时的临床聚类,以定义具有不同疾病轨迹的亚组。

方法

这项回顾性研究纳入了278例符合2019年欧洲抗风湿病联盟/美国风湿病学会分类标准的SLE患者。数据从患者病历中提取,包括人口统计学、临床和免疫学特征。进行了两次层次聚类分析:一次在诊断时,另一次在最后一次可获得随访时,基于23种临床表现。我们评估了各聚类中自身抗体的分布,并使用Cox回归模型进行生存分析以比较预后。

结果

诊断时确定了三个症状聚类,并在最后一次可获得随访时得到确认,具有一致的临床特征。最大的聚类1/1'表现出早期关节症状(95.3%;p = 0.0043)和皮肤黏膜症状(58.7%;p = 0.0031),生存率最佳。聚类2/2'表现出最严重的表型,包括肾脏受累(62.2%;p < 0.0001)、抗双链DNA抗体阳性(90.0%;p = 0.0151)和抗Sm抗体阳性(34.4%;p < 0.0001),预后较差。聚类3/3'表现出高比例符合混合性结缔组织病(MCTD)定义的SLE患者(50.0%;p < 0.0001),伴有抗U1-RNP 70 kDa自身抗体(87.5%;p < 0.0001)。聚类1和2在随访期间保持稳定,聚类2甚至随时间扩大,而超过一半的聚类3患者转变为不同的亚组。

结论

我们在SLE患者中确定了一种独特的MCTD表型、一种预后不良的严重SLE表型以及第三组内脏受累程度较低的SLE患者。聚类随时间保持稳定,为疾病进展提供了见解。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8f13/11987115/a1ec0bf67743/rmdopen-11-2-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8f13/11987115/9fea61fa55d7/rmdopen-11-2-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8f13/11987115/cff19eec0159/rmdopen-11-2-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8f13/11987115/d70b7088d67a/rmdopen-11-2-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8f13/11987115/0f7a59890e36/rmdopen-11-2-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8f13/11987115/a1ec0bf67743/rmdopen-11-2-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8f13/11987115/9fea61fa55d7/rmdopen-11-2-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8f13/11987115/cff19eec0159/rmdopen-11-2-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8f13/11987115/d70b7088d67a/rmdopen-11-2-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8f13/11987115/0f7a59890e36/rmdopen-11-2-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8f13/11987115/a1ec0bf67743/rmdopen-11-2-g005.jpg

相似文献

1
Prognostic insights from symptom clustering analysis in systemic lupus erythematosus.系统性红斑狼疮症状聚类分析的预后见解
RMD Open. 2025 Apr 9;11(2):e005330. doi: 10.1136/rmdopen-2024-005330.
2
Cluster analysis of clinical manifestations assigns systemic lupus erythematosus-phenotype subgroups: A multicentre study on 440 patients.临床表现聚类分析将系统性红斑狼疮表型亚组化:一项针对 440 例患者的多中心研究。
Joint Bone Spine. 2024 Dec;91(6):105760. doi: 10.1016/j.jbspin.2024.105760. Epub 2024 Jul 6.
3
IgE autoantibodies to nuclear antigens in patients with different connective tissue diseases: re-evaluation and novel findings.不同结缔组织病患者中针对核抗原的IgE自身抗体:重新评估及新发现
Front Immunol. 2025 Mar 20;16:1483815. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2025.1483815. eCollection 2025.
4
Cluster analysis of autoantibodies in 852 patients with systemic lupus erythematosus from a single center.来自单一中心的852例系统性红斑狼疮患者自身抗体的聚类分析。
J Rheumatol. 2014 Jul;41(7):1304-10. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.130984. Epub 2014 May 15.
5
Doubtful Clinical Value of Subtyping Anti-U1-RNP Antibodies Regarding the RNP-70 kDa Antigen in Sera of Patients with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus.抗 U1-RNP 抗体在系统性红斑狼疮患者血清中针对 RNP-70 kDa 抗原的亚型鉴定缺乏临床价值。
Int J Mol Sci. 2023 Jun 20;24(12):10398. doi: 10.3390/ijms241210398.
6
Evolutionary trajectory of undifferentiated connective tissue disease and impact of 2019 EULAR/ACR systemic lupus erythematosus classification criteria: insights from a longitudinal study.未分化结缔组织病的演变轨迹及2019年欧洲抗风湿病联盟/美国风湿病学会系统性红斑狼疮分类标准的影响:一项纵向研究的见解
Clin Exp Med. 2025 May 1;25(1):134. doi: 10.1007/s10238-025-01668-1.
7
The impact of anti-U1-RNP positivity: systemic lupus erythematosus versus mixed connective tissue disease.抗 U1-RNP 阳性的影响:系统性红斑狼疮与混合性结缔组织病。
Rheumatol Int. 2018 Jul;38(7):1169-1178. doi: 10.1007/s00296-018-4059-4. Epub 2018 May 23.
8
Diagnosis and risk stratification in patients with anti-RNP autoimmunity.抗RNP自身免疫患者的诊断与风险分层
Lupus. 2015 Sep;24(10):1057-66. doi: 10.1177/0961203315575586. Epub 2015 Mar 2.
9
Comparison between multiplex assays for autoantibody detection in systemic lupus erythematosus.多种自身抗体检测方法在系统性红斑狼疮中的比较。
J Immunol Methods. 2010 Jun 30;358(1-2):75-80. doi: 10.1016/j.jim.2010.04.005. Epub 2010 May 9.
10
Systemic lupus erythematosus in Tunisia: demographic and clinical analysis of 100 patients.突尼斯的系统性红斑狼疮:100例患者的人口统计学和临床分析
Lupus. 2004;13(3):204-11. doi: 10.1191/0961203303lu530xx.

本文引用的文献

1
Cluster analysis of clinical manifestations assigns systemic lupus erythematosus-phenotype subgroups: A multicentre study on 440 patients.临床表现聚类分析将系统性红斑狼疮表型亚组化:一项针对 440 例患者的多中心研究。
Joint Bone Spine. 2024 Dec;91(6):105760. doi: 10.1016/j.jbspin.2024.105760. Epub 2024 Jul 6.
2
Clinical presentation, course, and prognosis of patients with mixed connective tissue disease: A multicenter retrospective cohort.混合性结缔组织病患者的临床表现、病程和预后:一项多中心回顾性队列研究。
J Intern Med. 2024 Apr;295(4):532-543. doi: 10.1111/joim.13752. Epub 2023 Nov 27.
3
Towards Early Diagnosis of Mixed Connective Tissue Disease: Updated Perspectives.
迈向混合性结缔组织病的早期诊断:最新观点
Immunotargets Ther. 2023 Jul 26;12:79-89. doi: 10.2147/ITT.S390023. eCollection 2023.
4
Relationship between the EULAR/ACR classification criteria and organ damage in systemic lupus erythematosus.欧洲抗风湿病联盟/美国风湿病学会分类标准与系统性红斑狼疮器官损伤之间的关系。
Lupus. 2023 Mar;32(3):424-430. doi: 10.1177/09612033231153791. Epub 2023 Jan 18.
5
Phenotype clustering in health care: A narrative review for clinicians.医疗保健中的表型聚类:给临床医生的叙述性综述
Front Artif Intell. 2022 Aug 12;5:842306. doi: 10.3389/frai.2022.842306. eCollection 2022.
6
Advances in SLE classification criteria.SLE 分类标准的进展。
J Autoimmun. 2022 Oct;132:102845. doi: 10.1016/j.jaut.2022.102845. Epub 2022 Jun 17.
7
Molecular Taxonomy of Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Through Data-Driven Patient Stratification: Molecular Endotypes and Cluster-Tailored Drugs.基于数据驱动的患者分层的系统性红斑狼疮的分子分类学:分子内表型和聚类定制药物。
Front Immunol. 2022 May 9;13:860726. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.860726. eCollection 2022.
8
Three Clinical Clusters Identified through Hierarchical Cluster Analysis Using Initial Laboratory Findings in Korean Patients with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus.利用韩国系统性红斑狼疮患者的初始实验室检查结果通过层次聚类分析确定的三个临床聚类
J Clin Med. 2022 Apr 25;11(9):2406. doi: 10.3390/jcm11092406.
9
Four Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Subgroups, Defined by Autoantibodies Status, Differ Regarding HLA-DRB1 Genotype Associations and Immunological and Clinical Manifestations.根据自身抗体状态定义的四个系统性红斑狼疮亚组,在HLA - DRB1基因型关联以及免疫和临床表现方面存在差异。
ACR Open Rheumatol. 2022 Jan;4(1):27-39. doi: 10.1002/acr2.11343. Epub 2021 Oct 17.
10
Clinical subgroup clustering analysis in a systemic lupus erythematosus cohort from Western Pennsylvania.宾夕法尼亚西部系统性红斑狼疮队列中的临床亚组聚类分析。
Eur J Rheumatol. 2022 Jan;9(1):3-7. doi: 10.5152/eurjrheum.2020.21225.