Kudlek Laura, Eustachio Colombo Patricia, Mueller Julia, Sharp Stephen J, Boothby Clare E, Griffin Simon J, Butryn Meghan, Chwyl Christina, Forman Evan, Hagerman Charlotte, Hawkins Misty, Juarascio Adrienne, Knäuper Bärbel, Kolehmainen Marjukka, Levin Michael E, Lillis Jason, Maiz Edurne, Manasse Stephanie, Palmeira Lara, Pietiläinen Kirsi H, Sherwood Nancy E, Ahern Amy L
MRC Epidemiology Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Department of Psychology, Drexel University, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Int J Obes (Lond). 2025 Apr 10. doi: 10.1038/s41366-025-01759-9.
Obesity care may benefit from precision approaches, matching patients to treatment types based on their individual characteristics, including eating behaviour traits (EBTs) like emotional eating, uncontrolled eating, external eating, internal disinhibition and restraint. Initial evidence suggests that Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT)-based interventions might address dysregulated EBTs more effectively than standard behavioural treatments. However, it is unclear if ACT is more effective for certain EBT levels.
This pre-registered (CRD42022359691) one-stage Individual Participant Data (IPD) meta-analysis explored the moderating effects of baseline EBTs on weight outcomes in trials of ACT-based interventions for adults with a BMI ≥ 25 kg/m. Unlike traditional meta-analyses, IPD meta-analyses re-analyse existing data to answer novel research questions. We identified 16 eligible trials through a systematic search of eight databases until June 20, 2022. We obtained, checked, and harmonised data from 15 trials (N = 2535). We used mixed regression models to investigate both continuous and categorical interaction effects.
We found no evidence of interactions between ACT vs. control and baseline EBTs as continuous variables on percentage weight change. However, we found evidence to suggest an added difference in weight change of -4.47% (95%CI -1.15, -7.73) from baseline to 12-months after intervention end in participants with medium levels of internal disinhibition compared to those with high levels. Sensitivity analyses similarly indicated a greater intervention benefit for participants with medium, rather than high, emotional eating levels (in trials that reduced experiential avoidance and in trials using the three-factor eating questionnaire) and internal disinhibition (in analyses of participants with at least 60% attendance). Given the exploratory nature of analyses, results should be interpreted with caution.
Findings suggest potential non-linear interaction effects of ACT with internal disinhibition but require replication in confirmatory trials. These results may help guide further research on precision approaches based on EBTs.
肥胖症护理可能受益于精准方法,即根据患者的个体特征,包括情绪化进食、无节制进食、外部进食、内部去抑制和克制等饮食行为特征(EBTs),为患者匹配相应的治疗类型。初步证据表明,基于接受与承诺疗法(ACT)的干预措施可能比标准行为治疗更有效地解决失调的EBTs。然而,尚不清楚ACT对于某些EBT水平是否更有效。
这项预先注册(CRD42022359691)的单阶段个体参与者数据(IPD)荟萃分析,探讨了基线EBTs对体重指数(BMI)≥25kg/m²的成年患者基于ACT的干预试验中体重结果的调节作用。与传统荟萃分析不同,IPD荟萃分析重新分析现有数据以回答新的研究问题。我们通过系统检索八个数据库,截至2022年6月20日,确定了16项符合条件的试验。我们从15项试验(N = 2535)中获取、检查并统一了数据。我们使用混合回归模型来研究连续和分类交互效应。
我们没有发现ACT与对照组之间以及作为连续变量的基线EBTs对体重变化百分比存在交互作用的证据。然而,我们发现有证据表明,与高水平内部去抑制的参与者相比,中等水平内部去抑制的参与者在干预结束后12个月内体重变化从基线起额外下降了-4.47%(95%置信区间-1.15,-7.73)。敏感性分析同样表明,对于中等而非高水平情绪化进食(在减少经验性回避的试验和使用三因素饮食问卷的试验中)和内部去抑制(在至少60%出勤率的参与者分析中)的参与者,干预效果更大。鉴于分析的探索性性质,结果应谨慎解释。
研究结果表明ACT与内部去抑制之间可能存在非线性交互作用,但需要在验证性试验中进行重复验证。这些结果可能有助于指导基于EBTs的精准方法的进一步研究。