Suppr超能文献

靶区间距对采用下颌跟踪和下颌固定技术的椎体转移瘤单等中心放射治疗计划的影响

Impact of Intertarget Distances on Single-Isocenter Radiotherapy Plans with jaw-Tracking and jaw-Fixed Techniques for Vertebral Metastases.

作者信息

Xu Ling, Yin Huarui, Zhang Dewen, Qiu Wentong, Yin Xianfang, Xie Kai, Ni Xinye

机构信息

Department of Radiotherapy Oncology, The Affiliated Changzhou NO.2 People's Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Changzhou, China.

Jiangsu Province Engineering Research Center of Medical Physics, Changzhou, China.

出版信息

Technol Cancer Res Treat. 2025 Jan-Dec;24:15330338251332386. doi: 10.1177/15330338251332386. Epub 2025 Apr 11.

Abstract

IntroductionMultiple targets with varying distances are common in radiotherapy. Reducing treatment time in the plan design helps minimize patient movement and discomfort during the treatment process. This retrospective study aimed to investigate the impact of varying intertarget distances (ITDs) on the dosimetric differences and delivery efficiency of two single-isocenter techniques.MethodsITDs for 15 patients with dual-site vertebral metastases undergoing volume-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) were modified using Matlab 2019a. Distances of 2, 4, 6, 8, and 10 cm were considered. The VMAT plans were designed with a prescription dose of 40 Gy/20f on Infinity Linac and Monaco 5.40.01. Single-isocenter with jaw tracking (VMAT1) and fixed jaw (VMAT2) were compared in terms of dosimetry and delivery efficiency under different ITDs.ResultsResults showed that both VMAT plans exhibited dosimetric parameters meeting clinical requirements. The conformity index (CI) of VMAT1 plans was smaller than that of VMAT2 at ITD = 4, 6, and 8 cm (P = 0.007, 0.020, and 0.039, respectively), with no significant differences in other planning target volume dosimetry parameters. In terms of delivery efficiency, the treatment time of VMAT1 increased significantly when ITD > 2 cm compared with that at ITD = 2 cm (P = 0.000). Conversely, VMAT2 exhibited no significant change in treatment time at different ITDs (P = 0.073). For ITD = 2 cm, the treatment time of VMAT1 was shorter than that of VMAT2, with a median difference of 77 s. For ITD > 2 cm, the treatment time of VMAT2 was shorter than that of VMAT1, with a median difference ranging from 65 s to 121 s.ConclusionThe experimental results showed that the single-isocenter with jaw tracking is recommended in the planning design when ITDs are less than 2 cm. However, for ITDs greater than 2 cm, the single-isocenter with fixed jaw demonstrates high delivery efficiency.5075.

摘要

引言

在放射治疗中,具有不同距离的多个靶区很常见。在计划设计中减少治疗时间有助于在治疗过程中最大程度地减少患者的移动和不适。这项回顾性研究旨在调查不同靶区间距(ITD)对两种单等中心技术的剂量差异和照射效率的影响。

方法

使用Matlab 2019a对15例接受容积调强弧形放疗(VMAT)的双部位椎体转移患者的ITD进行修改。考虑的距离为2、4、6、8和10厘米。VMAT计划在Infinity直线加速器和Monaco 5.40.01上设计,处方剂量为40 Gy/20次分割。比较了在不同ITD下,具有射野跟踪功能的单等中心(VMAT1)和固定射野(VMAT2)的剂量学和照射效率。

结果

结果表明,两种VMAT计划的剂量学参数均符合临床要求。在ITD = 4、6和8厘米时,VMAT1计划的适形指数(CI)小于VMAT2(分别为P = 0.007、0.020和0.039),其他计划靶区体积剂量学参数无显著差异。在照射效率方面,与ITD = 2厘米时相比,当ITD>2厘米时,VMAT1的治疗时间显著增加(P = 0.000)。相反,VMAT2在不同ITD下的治疗时间无显著变化(P = 0.073)。对于ITD = 2厘米,VMAT1的治疗时间短于VMAT2,中位差异为77秒。对于ITD>2厘米,VMAT2的治疗时间短于VMAT1,中位差异范围为65秒至121秒。

结论

实验结果表明,当ITD小于2厘米时,在计划设计中建议采用具有射野跟踪功能的单等中心。然而,对于ITD大于2厘米时,固定射野的单等中心显示出较高的照射效率。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e60e/12033447/fc82866c6429/10.1177_15330338251332386-fig1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验