Shaafie Harris Ishtiyaq, Koti V R, Saxena Kshitij, Shukla Priyanka
Department of Dermatology, Eras Lucknow Medical College and Hospital, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India.
J Cutan Aesthet Surg. 2025 Apr-Jun;18(2):86-91. doi: 10.25259/jcas_178_23. Epub 2024 Sep 16.
Numerous studies have been conducted on the clinical efficacy of immunotherapeutic agents in the treatment of cutaneous warts showing variable results. The present study aimed to compare the clinical efficacy and safety of intralesional tuberculin purified protein derivative (PPD) and Vitamin D therapy in recurrent and recalcitrant extra-genital cutaneous warts.
This study was conducted as a prospective, randomized, comparative, and single-blind study. A total of 104 patients were randomly distributed into two treatment groups: Group A (Tuberculin PPD, = 53) and Group B (Vitamin D, = 51). Each patient in Group A received an intralesional injection of 0.1 mL tuberculin PPD (5 Tuberculin Units), while each patient in Group B received an intralesional injection of 0.2 mL Vitamin D (Cholecalciferol containing 120,000 IU). The injections were given at the initial visit (week 0) and after every 2 weeks for a maximum of four sessions (weeks 2, 4, and 6). The largest wart was selected for intralesional therapy. The categorization of clinical response was done based on the percent reduction in the size of warts into complete (appearance of normal skin), marked (>50% reduction), moderate (<50% reduction), and inadequate (no change in warts) responses. Adverse effects (if any) were recorded during each patient visit. The final response was evaluated at 6 months follow-up from the last treatment session.
Regarding the response of patients to tuberculin PPD therapy, out of a total of 53 patients, 40 (75.5%) showed a complete response. Regarding the response of patients to Vitamin D therapy, out of a total of 51 patients, 36 (70.6%) showed a complete response. However, the difference in the response to the treatment between the two groups was statistically insignificant ( = 0.402).
Both intralesional tuberculin PPD and Vitamin D are effective and safe in the treatment of all recurrent and recalcitrant extra-genital cutaneous warts.
关于免疫治疗药物治疗皮肤疣的临床疗效,已开展了大量研究,结果各不相同。本研究旨在比较病灶内注射结核菌素纯蛋白衍生物(PPD)和维生素D疗法治疗复发性及顽固性生殖器外皮肤疣的临床疗效和安全性。
本研究为前瞻性、随机、对照、单盲研究。共104例患者被随机分为两个治疗组:A组(结核菌素PPD,n = 53)和B组(维生素D,n = 51)。A组每位患者接受0.1 mL结核菌素PPD(5结核菌素单位)病灶内注射,而B组每位患者接受0.2 mL维生素D(含120,000 IU胆钙化醇)病灶内注射。在初次就诊时(第0周)及之后每2周注射一次,最多注射4次(第2、4和6周)。选择最大的疣体进行病灶内治疗。临床反应根据疣体大小缩小百分比分为完全缓解(正常皮肤出现)、显著缓解(缩小>50%)、中度缓解(缩小<50%)和无效(疣体无变化)。每次患者就诊时记录不良反应(如有)。在最后一次治疗疗程后6个月随访时评估最终反应。
关于患者对结核菌素PPD治疗的反应,在总共53例患者中,40例(75.5%)显示完全缓解。关于患者对维生素D治疗的反应,在总共51例患者中,36例(70.6%)显示完全缓解。然而,两组治疗反应的差异无统计学意义(P = 0.402)。
病灶内注射结核菌素PPD和维生素D治疗所有复发性及顽固性生殖器外皮肤疣均有效且安全。