Vasan Aditi, Knowles Molly, Flerchinger Shaun, Tandy Thomas K, Mosen David, Soltesz Jessica, Paradis Olivia, Friedman Nicole, Long Judith A, Ertz-Berger Briar L, Kangovi Shreya
Division of General Pediatrics, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Penn Center for Community Health Workers, University of Pennsylvania Health System, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
J Gen Intern Med. 2025 Apr 11. doi: 10.1007/s11606-025-09495-6.
Community health worker (CHW) interventions can improve health outcomes and reduce acute care utilization. Few prior studies have examined the association of CHW interventions with health care utilization among patients within an integrated health system.
To evaluate the effects of Individualized Management for Patient Centered Targets (IMPaCT), a standardized CHW intervention originally developed within a single health system in Philadelphia, PA, on acute care utilization and primary care engagement among low-income patients at two clinics within an integrated health system in Portland, Oregon.
Prospective randomized analysis using adjusted difference-in-differences regression.
In total, 1230 adults living in low-income zip codes were randomized using a 2:1 allocation sequence to receive either IMPaCT (n = 820) or usual care (n = 410).
IMPaCT is a standardized intervention in which CHWs use an in-depth interview to understand patients' strengths, social needs, and health-related goals and then collaboratively develop tailored action plans. Over 3 months, CHWs communicated with patients at least once weekly to provide coaching, social support, and navigation tailored to their goals. Due to the COVID- 19 pandemic, the intervention was predominantly delivered remotely.
Primary outcome measures were hospital and emergency department (ED) utilization, both measured per 1000 members per month, and proportion of patients with 1+ primary care visits. Implementation fidelity and maintenance were also assessed.
Compared to usual care, patients who received IMPaCT had a relative reduction in total hospital days at 6 months (- 172.3 days per 1000 members per month, 95% CI - 320.05 to - 24.53, p= 0.022), and a greater proportion attended 1+ primary care visits (85.7% vs. 79.5%, p= 0.006). There were no differences in ED utilization.
A standardized CHW intervention delivered remotely within an integrated health system during the COVID- 19 pandemic was associated with decreased hospital utilization and improved primary care engagement.
社区卫生工作者(CHW)干预措施可改善健康结局并减少急性护理的使用。此前很少有研究探讨综合卫生系统内患者中CHW干预措施与医疗保健使用之间的关联。
评估以患者为中心的目标个体化管理(IMPaCT)——最初在宾夕法尼亚州费城的一个单一卫生系统内开发的标准化CHW干预措施——对俄勒冈州波特兰市一个综合卫生系统内两家诊所的低收入患者急性护理使用和初级保健参与度的影响。
采用调整后的差异-in-差异回归进行前瞻性随机分析。
总共1230名居住在低收入邮政编码地区的成年人按照2:1的分配顺序随机分组,分别接受IMPaCT(n = 820)或常规护理(n = 410)。
IMPaCT是一种标准化干预措施,CHW通过深入访谈了解患者的优势、社会需求和与健康相关的目标,然后共同制定量身定制的行动计划。在3个月的时间里,CHW每周至少与患者沟通一次,根据他们的目标提供指导、社会支持和引导。由于新冠疫情,干预措施主要通过远程方式提供。
主要结局指标是医院和急诊科(ED)的使用情况,均以每月每1000名成员为单位进行测量,以及有1次及以上初级保健就诊的患者比例。还评估了实施的保真度和维持情况。
与常规护理相比,接受IMPaCT的患者在6个月时总住院天数相对减少(每月每1000名成员减少172.3天,95%置信区间 -320.05至-24.53,p = 0.022),并且有1次及以上初级保健就诊的患者比例更高(85.7%对79.5%,p = 0.006)。急诊科使用情况没有差异。
在新冠疫情期间,在综合卫生系统内通过远程方式提供的标准化CHW干预措施与医院使用减少和初级保健参与度提高相关。