• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

戒烟还是不戒烟?评估土耳其室内吸烟禁令对戒烟意愿的因果效应。

To quit or not to quit? estimating the causal effects of Türkiye's indoor smoking ban on the intentions to quit smoking.

作者信息

Değerli Hakan, Acar Yasin, Ankara Hasan Giray

机构信息

Vocational School of Health Services, Department of Medical Services and Techniques, Bilecik Şeyh Edebali University, Bilecik, Türkiye.

Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences, Department of Public Finance, Bilecik Şeyh Edebali University, Bilecik, Türkiye.

出版信息

BMC Public Health. 2025 Apr 11;25(1):1367. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-22639-x.

DOI:10.1186/s12889-025-22639-x
PMID:40217203
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11987318/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Smoking bans aim to reduce tobacco use, but their long-term effectiveness remains uncertain. This study investigates short- and long-term causal effects of Türkiye's indoor smoking ban policy on the intentions to quit smoking among adults.

METHODS

Using three waves of data (2008, 2012, and 2016) from the Global Adult Tobacco Survey (GATS), we analyse the changes in intentions to quit smoking before and after the implementation of indoor smoking ban policy in July 2009. The analysis includes data from 2008 as the pre-policy period, 2012 as the short post-policy period, and 2016 as a long post-policy period, to observe both initial and sustained effects.

RESULTS

Results indicate a modest positive effect shortly after the ban's implementation, with a 2% increase in the log odds of intention to quit smoking in 2012 among the individuals exposed to the ban. However, by 2016, the effect appears to vanish, with a 11% decrease in the log odds of intention to quit smoking among those exposed to the ban over a prolonged period.

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, the study suggests that while the smoking ban initially encouraged quitting intentions, its effect did not sustain over time, emphasizing the need for the controls of society compliance and of policy implementations.

摘要

背景

禁烟令旨在减少烟草使用,但其长期有效性仍不确定。本研究调查了土耳其室内禁烟政策对成年人戒烟意愿的短期和长期因果效应。

方法

利用全球成人烟草调查(GATS)的三轮数据(2008年、2012年和2016年),我们分析了2009年7月室内禁烟政策实施前后戒烟意愿的变化。分析包括2008年作为政策实施前时期的数据、2012年作为政策实施后短期的数据以及2016年作为政策实施后长期的数据,以观察初始效应和持续效应。

结果

结果表明,禁令实施后不久有适度的积极影响,在接触禁令的人群中,2012年戒烟意愿的对数几率增加了2%。然而,到2016年,这种影响似乎消失了,长期接触禁令的人群中戒烟意愿的对数几率下降了11%。

结论

总体而言,该研究表明,虽然禁烟令最初鼓励了戒烟意愿,但其效果并未随时间持续,强调了社会合规控制和政策实施的必要性。

相似文献

1
To quit or not to quit? estimating the causal effects of Türkiye's indoor smoking ban on the intentions to quit smoking.戒烟还是不戒烟?评估土耳其室内吸烟禁令对戒烟意愿的因果效应。
BMC Public Health. 2025 Apr 11;25(1):1367. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-22639-x.
2
Pathways of change explaining the effect of smoke-free legislation on smoking cessation in The Netherlands. An application of the international tobacco control conceptual model.解释无烟立法对荷兰戒烟效果的变化途径。国际烟草控制概念模型的应用。
Nicotine Tob Res. 2012 Dec;14(12):1474-82. doi: 10.1093/ntr/nts081. Epub 2012 Apr 5.
3
Impact of Smoking Cessation Motivations and Barriers on Quit Intentions Following a Hypothetical Flavor Ban Among African American/Black Individuals Who Use Menthol Cigarettes: A Mixed-Methods Study.假设薄荷香烟口味禁令后,非裔美国人/黑人使用薄荷香烟者戒烟动机和障碍对戒烟意愿的影响:一项混合方法研究。
Nicotine Tob Res. 2024 May 31;26(Supplement_2):S121-S132. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntad062.
4
Impact of national smoke-free legislation on home smoking bans: findings from the International Tobacco Control Policy Evaluation Project Europe Surveys.国家无烟立法对家庭禁烟的影响:来自国际烟草控制政策评估项目欧洲调查的结果。
Tob Control. 2013 May;22(e1):e2-9. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2011-050131. Epub 2012 Feb 13.
5
Smoke-free air laws and quit attempts: Evidence for a moderating role of spontaneous self-affirmation.无烟空气法与戒烟尝试:关于自发自我肯定的调节作用的证据
Soc Sci Med. 2015 Sep;141:46-55. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2015.07.015. Epub 2015 Jul 20.
6
The population impact of smoke-free workplace and hospitality industry legislation on smoking behaviour. Findings from a national population survey.无烟工作场所和酒店业立法对吸烟行为的人口影响。全国人口调查的结果。
Addiction. 2011 Apr;106(4):816-23. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2010.03247.x. Epub 2010 Dec 23.
7
The contribution of a 'whole of government' smoke-free policy on the island of St Helena.圣赫勒拿岛“整体政府”无烟政策的贡献。
Glob Health Action. 2019;12(1):1681756. doi: 10.1080/16549716.2019.1681756.
8
Smoking restrictions in homes after implementation of a smoking ban in public places.在公共场所实施禁烟令后家庭中的吸烟限制。
Nicotine Tob Res. 2015 Jan;17(1):41-7. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntu125. Epub 2014 Aug 18.
9
Outdoor smoking behaviour and support for outdoor smoking restrictions before and after France's national smoking ban.法国实施全国禁烟令前后的户外吸烟行为和对户外禁烟限制的支持情况。
Eur J Public Health. 2012 Feb;22 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):29-34. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckr208.
10
Impact of tobacco prices and smoke-free policy on smoking cessation, by gender and educational group: Spain, 1993-2012.烟草价格和无烟政策对不同性别和教育程度人群戒烟的影响:西班牙,1993-2012 年。
Int J Drug Policy. 2015 Dec;26(12):1215-21. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2015.05.011. Epub 2015 Jun 5.

本文引用的文献

1
Prevalence and attributable health burden of chronic respiratory diseases, 1990-2017: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017.1990-2017 年慢性呼吸道疾病的流行情况和可归因健康负担:2017 年全球疾病负担研究的系统分析。
Lancet Respir Med. 2020 Jun;8(6):585-596. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(20)30105-3.
2
Implementing smoke-free policies in low- and middle-income countries: A brief review and research agenda.在低收入和中等收入国家实施无烟政策:简要综述与研究议程。
Tob Induc Dis. 2019 Aug 5;17:60. doi: 10.18332/tid/110007. eCollection 2019.
3
The Impact of Implementing Tobacco Control Policies: The 2017 Tobacco Control Policy Scorecard.实施烟草控制政策的影响:2017 年烟草控制政策评分卡。
J Public Health Manag Pract. 2018 Sep/Oct;24(5):448-457. doi: 10.1097/PHH.0000000000000780.
4
Impact of Tobacco Control Policies on Adolescent Smoking.烟草控制政策对青少年吸烟的影响。
J Adolesc Health. 2016 Jun;58(6):679-85. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2016.02.014. Epub 2016 Apr 14.
5
Association of Smoke-Free Laws With Lower Percentages of New and Current Smokers Among Adolescents and Young Adults: An 11-Year Longitudinal Study.无烟法律与青少年和青年中新吸烟者及当前吸烟者比例降低之间的关联:一项为期11年的纵向研究。
JAMA Pediatr. 2015 Sep;169(9):e152285. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2015.2285. Epub 2015 Sep 8.
6
Tobacco taxes as a tobacco control strategy.烟草税作为控烟策略。
Tob Control. 2012 Mar;21(2):172-80. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2011-050417.
7
Smokefree policies to reduce tobacco use. A systematic review.无烟政策以减少烟草使用。系统评价。
Am J Prev Med. 2010 Feb;38(2 Suppl):S275-89. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2009.10.029.
8
Use of smoking-cessation treatments in the United States.美国戒烟治疗方法的使用情况。
Am J Prev Med. 2008 Feb;34(2):102-11. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2007.09.033.
9
Exploring the seasonality of cigarette-smoking behaviour.探究吸烟行为的季节性。
Tob Control. 2007 Feb;16(1):69-70. doi: 10.1136/tc.2006.018135.
10
Individual-level predictors of cessation behaviours among participants in the International Tobacco Control (ITC) Four Country Survey.国际烟草控制(ITC)四国调查参与者戒烟行为的个体层面预测因素。
Tob Control. 2006 Jun;15 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):iii83-94. doi: 10.1136/tc.2005.013516.