• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Correlations between the Japanese version of the Global Physical Activity Questionnaire and accelerometer-measured physical activity and sedentary time in adult women and men.日本版全球体力活动问卷与通过加速度计测量的成年女性和男性体力活动及久坐时间之间的相关性。
J Act Sedentary Sleep Behav. 2024 Nov 25;3(1):29. doi: 10.1186/s44167-024-00069-1.
2
Validity of the global physical activity questionnaire (GPAQ) in Bangladesh.全球体力活动问卷(GPAQ)在孟加拉国的有效性。
BMC Public Health. 2017 Aug 10;17(1):650. doi: 10.1186/s12889-017-4666-0.
3
Validity of the global physical activity questionnaire (GPAQ) in assessing levels and change in moderate-vigorous physical activity and sedentary behaviour.全球体力活动问卷(GPAQ)在评估中等强度至剧烈体力活动及久坐行为水平与变化方面的效度。
BMC Public Health. 2014 Dec 10;14:1255. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-14-1255.
4
Reliability and validity of a Global Physical Activity Questionnaire adapted for use among pregnant women in Nepal.适用于尼泊尔孕妇的全球身体活动问卷的信度和效度
Arch Public Health. 2023 Feb 10;81(1):18. doi: 10.1186/s13690-023-01032-3.
5
Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Global Physical Activity Questionnaire among healthy Hungarian adults.全球体力活动问卷在健康匈牙利成年人中的跨文化调适和验证。
BMC Public Health. 2020 Aug 17;20(Suppl 1):1056. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-08477-z.
6
Reliability and Validity of the Self- and Interviewer-Administered Versions of the Global Physical Activity Questionnaire (GPAQ).全球体力活动问卷(GPAQ)自我施测版和访谈员施测版的信度与效度
PLoS One. 2015 Sep 1;10(9):e0136944. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0136944. eCollection 2015.
7
Convergent validity: agreement between accelerometry and the Global Physical Activity Questionnaire in college-age Saudi men.收敛效度:沙特阿拉伯大学生男性群体中加速度计与全球体力活动问卷之间的一致性。
BMC Res Notes. 2016 Sep 8;9(1):436. doi: 10.1186/s13104-016-2242-9.
8
Domain-Specific Adult Sedentary Behaviour Questionnaire (ASBQ) and the GPAQ Single-Item Question: A Reliability and Validity Study in an Asian Population.领域特定的成人久坐行为问卷(ASBQ)和 GPAQ 单项问题:亚洲人群中的信度和效度研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 Apr 12;15(4):739. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15040739.
9
Adapting and Validating the Global Physical Activity Questionnaire (GPAQ) for Trivandrum, India, 2013.2013年针对印度特里凡得琅改编并验证全球体力活动问卷(GPAQ)
Prev Chronic Dis. 2016 Apr 21;13:E53. doi: 10.5888/pcd13.150528.
10
Reliability and validity of a self-administered Arabic version of the Global Physical Activity Questionnaire (GPAQ-A).全球体力活动问卷阿拉伯文自填版(GPAQ-A)的信度和效度
J Sports Med Phys Fitness. 2019 Jul;59(7):1221-1228. doi: 10.23736/S0022-4707.18.09186-7. Epub 2018 Oct 10.

本文引用的文献

1
Validity and Reliability of IPAQ-SF and GPAQ for Assessing Sedentary Behaviour in Adults in the European Union: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.《评估欧盟成年人久坐行为的 IPAQ-SF 和 GPAQ 的有效性和可靠性:系统评价和荟萃分析》
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Apr 26;18(9):4602. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18094602.
2
Validity and Reliability of International Physical Activity Questionnaires for Adults across EU Countries: Systematic Review and Meta Analysis.欧盟国家成年人国际体力活动问卷的有效性和可靠性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Sep 30;17(19):7161. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17197161.
3
Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Global Physical Activity Questionnaire among healthy Hungarian adults.全球体力活动问卷在健康匈牙利成年人中的跨文化调适和验证。
BMC Public Health. 2020 Aug 17;20(Suppl 1):1056. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-08477-z.
4
Public health surveillance of habitual physical activity in adolescents and adults in Namibia: a cross-sectional validation of activity questionnaires against accelerometry.纳米比亚青少年和成年人习惯性体力活动的公共卫生监测:使用活动问卷和加速度计对活动问卷进行横断面验证。
J Public Health (Oxf). 2021 Dec 10;43(4):e706-e712. doi: 10.1093/pubmed/fdaa067.
5
Validity and reliability of subjective methods to assess sedentary behaviour in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis.评估成年人久坐行为的主观方法的有效性和可靠性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2020 Jun 15;17(1):75. doi: 10.1186/s12966-020-00972-1.
6
A comparison of self-reported and device measured sedentary behaviour in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis.比较成年人自我报告和设备测量的久坐行为:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2020 Mar 4;17(1):31. doi: 10.1186/s12966-020-00938-3.
7
Validity of estimating physical activity intensity using a triaxial accelerometer in healthy adults and older adults.使用三轴加速度计评估健康成年人和老年人身体活动强度的有效性。
BMJ Open Sport Exerc Med. 2019 Oct 28;5(1):e000592. doi: 10.1136/bmjsem-2019-000592. eCollection 2019.
8
Reliability and Concurrent Validity of Global Physical Activity Questionnaire (GPAQ): A Systematic Review.全球体力活动问卷(GPAQ)的信度和同时效度:系统评价。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Oct 26;16(21):4128. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16214128.
9
Development of the Korean Global Physical Activity Questionnaire: reliability and validity study.韩国全球体力活动问卷的编制:信度和效度研究。
Glob Health Promot. 2020 Sep;27(3):44-55. doi: 10.1177/1757975919854301. Epub 2019 Aug 2.
10
Reliability and validity of a self-administered Arabic version of the Global Physical Activity Questionnaire (GPAQ-A).全球体力活动问卷阿拉伯文自填版(GPAQ-A)的信度和效度
J Sports Med Phys Fitness. 2019 Jul;59(7):1221-1228. doi: 10.23736/S0022-4707.18.09186-7. Epub 2018 Oct 10.

日本版全球体力活动问卷与通过加速度计测量的成年女性和男性体力活动及久坐时间之间的相关性。

Correlations between the Japanese version of the Global Physical Activity Questionnaire and accelerometer-measured physical activity and sedentary time in adult women and men.

作者信息

Tanaka Chiaki, Reilly John J, Tanaka Shigeho

机构信息

Department of Human Nutrition, Tokyo Kasei Gakuin University, 22 Sanbancho, Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo, 102-8341, Japan.

National Institute of Health and Nutrition, National Institutes of Biomedical Innovation, Health and Nutrition, Osaka, 566-0002, Japan.

出版信息

J Act Sedentary Sleep Behav. 2024 Nov 25;3(1):29. doi: 10.1186/s44167-024-00069-1.

DOI:10.1186/s44167-024-00069-1
PMID:40217430
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11960350/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Physical activity (PA) and sedentary behaviour have important health implications. Self-reported measures of PA and sitting time (ST) such as questionnaires are most commonly used in public health studies and surveillance, but their accuracy might be affected by cultural differences between countries. The aim of the present study was to examine the correlation between the self-administered Global PA Questionnaire - Japanese version (GPAQ-J) and accelerometer in Japanese adults.

METHODS

A cross-sectional comparative study was conducted to examine the last 7 days PA by GPAQ-J, comparing with accelerometer data. A convenience sample of 181 women and 85 men were included.

RESULTS

Significant positive correlations using Spearman's rank correlation were observed between total moderate-to-vigorous PA (MVPA) by GPAQ-J and both of accelerometer-measured total MVPA and 10-minute bouts of MVPA in both women and men, with a higher correlation in men (total MVPA: ρ = 0.375, 10-minute bouts of MVPA: ρ = 0.419). GPAQ-J transportation MVPA was significantly correlated with all types of variables for accelerometer-measured MVPA for men, particularly with ambulatory MVPA (ρ = 0.615). On the other hand, for women, a significant positive correlation was observed between GPAQ-J recreation MVPA and accelerometer-measured 10-minute bouts of MVPA. Average MVPA with GPAQ-J was between the accelerometer-measured total MVPA and the 10 min bouts of MVPA in both genders. A significant positive correlation was only observed between ST by accelerometer and the GPAQ-J question in men (ρ = 0.332), not women (ρ = 0.004).

CONCLUSIONS

The GPAQ-J has weak or moderate validity for evaluating both total and 10-minute bouts of MVPA in Japanese women and men. ST by the GPAQ-J has moderate validity only in men.

摘要

背景

身体活动(PA)和久坐行为对健康有重要影响。在公共卫生研究和监测中,最常用的PA和久坐时间(ST)的自我报告测量方法,如问卷调查,但它们的准确性可能会受到国家间文化差异的影响。本研究的目的是检验日本成年人自我管理的全球身体活动问卷 - 日本版(GPAQ-J)与加速度计之间的相关性。

方法

进行了一项横断面比较研究,通过GPAQ-J检查过去7天的PA,并与加速度计数据进行比较。纳入了181名女性和85名男性的便利样本。

结果

使用Spearman等级相关性观察到,GPAQ-J测量的总中度至剧烈身体活动(MVPA)与加速度计测量的总MVPA以及男性和女性的10分钟MVPA发作之间存在显著正相关,男性的相关性更高(总MVPA:ρ = 0.375,10分钟MVPA发作:ρ = 0.419)。GPAQ-J交通MVPA与男性加速度计测量的MVPA的所有类型变量显著相关,特别是与步行MVPA(ρ = 0.615)。另一方面,对于女性,GPAQ-J娱乐MVPA与加速度计测量的10分钟MVPA发作之间观察到显著正相关。在男女中,GPAQ-J的平均MVPA介于加速度计测量的总MVPA和10分钟MVPA发作之间。仅在男性中观察到加速度计测量的ST与GPAQ-J问题之间存在显著正相关(ρ = 0.332),女性中未观察到(ρ = 0.004)。

结论

GPAQ-J在评估日本男性和女性的总MVPA以及10分钟MVPA发作方面具有较弱或中等的有效性。GPAQ-J测量的ST仅在男性中具有中等有效性。