Faculty of Sports, University of Ljubljana, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Faculty of Kinesiology, University of Zagreb, 10110 Zagreb, Croatia.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Sep 30;17(19):7161. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17197161.
This review and meta-analysis (PROSPERO registration number: CRD42020138845) critically evaluates test-retest reliability, concurrent validity and criterion validity of different physical activity (PA) levels of three most commonly used international PA questionnaires (PAQs) in official language versions of European Union (EU): International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ-SF), Global Physical Activity Questionnaire (GPAQ), and European Health Interview Survey-Physical Activity Questionnaire (EHIS-PAQ). In total, 1749 abstracts were screened, 287 full-text articles were identified as relevant to the study objectives, and 20 studies were included. The studies' results and quality were evaluated using the Quality Assessment of Physical Activity Questionnaires checklist. Results indicate that only ten EU countries validated official language versions of selected PAQs. A meta-analysis revealed that assessment of moderate-to-vigorous PA (MVPA) is the most relevant PA level outcome, since no publication bias in any of measurement properties was detected while test-retest reliability was moderately high (r = 0.74), moderate for the criterion (r = 0.41) and moderately-high for concurrent validity (r = 0.72). Reporting of methods and results of the studies was poor, with an overall moderate risk of bias with a total score of 0.43. In conclusion, where only self-reporting of PA is feasible, assessment of MVPA with selected PAQs in EU adult populations is recommended.
这篇综述和荟萃分析（PROSPERO 注册号：CRD42020138845）批判性地评估了三种最常用的国际体力活动（PA）问卷（PAQs）在欧盟官方语言版本中的重测信度、同时效度和标准效度：国际体力活动问卷（IPAQ-SF）、全球体力活动问卷（GPAQ）和欧洲健康访谈调查-体力活动问卷（EHIS-PAQ）。总共筛选了 1749 篇摘要，确定了 287 篇与研究目标相关的全文文章，并纳入了 20 项研究。使用体力活动问卷质量评估清单评估了研究结果和质量。结果表明，只有十个欧盟国家验证了所选 PAQs 的官方语言版本。荟萃分析显示，评估中度到剧烈体力活动（MVPA）是最相关的体力活动水平结果，因为在任何测量特性中都没有检测到发表偏倚，而重测信度中等偏高（r = 0.74），标准效度中等（r = 0.41），同时效度中等偏高（r = 0.72）。研究方法和结果的报告很差，总体偏差风险中度，总分为 0.43。总之，在仅可行自我报告 PA 的情况下，建议在欧盟成年人群中使用选定的 PAQs 评估 MVPA。
