Pehrson Lea Marie, Petersen Jens, Panduro Nathalie Sarup, Lauridsen Carsten Ammitzbøl, Carlsen Jonathan Frederik, Darkner Sune, Nielsen Michael Bachmann, Ingala Silvia
Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Copenhagen University Hospital Rigshospitalet, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark.
Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark.
Diagnostics (Basel). 2025 Mar 26;15(7):846. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics15070846.
: Approximately 50% of all oncological patients undergo radiation therapy, where personalized planning of treatment relies on gross tumor volume (GTV) delineation. Manual delineation of GTV is time-consuming, operator-dependent, and prone to variability. An increasing number of studies apply artificial intelligence (AI) techniques to automate such delineation processes. : To perform a systematic review comparing the performance of AI models in tumor delineations within the body (thoracic cavity, esophagus, abdomen, and pelvis, or soft tissue and bone). A retrospective search of five electronic databases was performed between January 2017 and February 2025. Original research studies developing and/or validating algorithms delineating GTV in CT, MRI, and/or PET were included. The Checklist for Artificial Intelligence in Medical Imaging (CLAIM) and Transparent Reporting of a multivariable prediction model for Individual Prognosis Or Diagnosis statement and checklist (TRIPOD) were used to assess the risk, bias, and reporting adherence. : After screening 2430 articles, 48 were included. The pooled diagnostic performance from the use of AI algorithms across different tumors and topological areas ranged 0.62-0.92 in dice similarity coefficient (DSC) and 1.33-47.10 mm in Hausdorff distance (HD). The algorithms with the highest DSC deployed an encoder-decoder architecture. : AI algorithms demonstrate a high level of concordance with clinicians in GTV delineation. Translation to clinical settings requires the building of trust, improvement in performance and robustness of results, and testing in prospective studies and randomized controlled trials.
大约50%的肿瘤患者接受放射治疗,其中治疗的个性化规划依赖于大体肿瘤体积(GTV)的勾画。手动勾画GTV既耗时、依赖操作人员,又容易出现变异性。越来越多的研究应用人工智能(AI)技术来自动化此类勾画过程。
为了进行一项系统评价,比较AI模型在体内肿瘤(胸腔、食管、腹部和盆腔,或软组织和骨骼)勾画中的性能。在2017年1月至2025年2月期间对五个电子数据库进行了回顾性检索。纳入了开发和/或验证在CT、MRI和/或PET中勾画GTV算法的原始研究。使用医学影像人工智能清单(CLAIM)和个体预后或诊断多变量预测模型的透明报告声明及清单(TRIPOD)来评估风险、偏倚和报告依从性。
在筛选了2430篇文章后,纳入了48篇。在不同肿瘤和拓扑区域使用AI算法的汇总诊断性能,骰子相似系数(DSC)范围为0.62 - 0.92,豪斯多夫距离(HD)范围为1.33 - 47.10毫米。DSC最高的算法采用了编码器 - 解码器架构。
AI算法在GTV勾画方面与临床医生表现出高度一致性。向临床环境的转化需要建立信任、提高结果的性能和稳健性,并在前瞻性研究和随机对照试验中进行测试。