Edgerton Ryan, Rebeiro Peter, MacMaster Sam, Bell Lisa, Patel Parul, Ginn Loren, Beach Kyra, Shah Veeraj, Cooper R Lyle
Meharry Medical College Nashville, Nashville, USA.
Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, USA.
Harm Reduct J. 2025 Apr 12;22(1):51. doi: 10.1186/s12954-025-01201-3.
Over a million people have died from overdose since 1999, over 600,000. of which involved opioids. Treatment options that focus on overdose prevention are desperately needed and buprenorphine treatment is a form of opioid prevention if provided in a harm reduction setting. Co-morbid opioid and stimulant use disorders have increased at a higher rate than other co-morbid combinations between 2011 and 2019. The objective of this study was to identify the effects of psychostimulant use on buprenorphine treatment retention.
We conducted an analysis of a cohort of 143 individuals with opioid use disorder that initiated treatment in a low-threshold, urban office based opioid treatment (OBOT) clinic located in Nashville Tennessee between 2018 and 2020. Retention was measured at 1, 3, and 6-months. Logistic regression was used to identify differences between people who tested positive for stimulants and people who did not.
The majority of the patients were white (83%), male (64%), unhoused (59%) and uninsured (70%). There was moderate psychostimulant use in the sample with 19% testing positive for cocaine and 13% testing positive for methamphetamine at baseline. Patients testing positive for cocaine prior to their six month retention point had 0.279 lower odds of being retained in treatment. Further, testing positive for either cocaine or methamphetamine resulted in 0.284 and 0.258 odds of retention at 3 and 6-months respectively.
This study examined the impact of stimulant use on retention in buprenorphine treatment within a low-threshold OBOT clinic. Our findings differ from previous research that reported significant decreases in retention among methamphetamine users. Instead, results suggest that patients using psychostimulants can be effectively retained in care within a low-resource, low-threshold setting, though increased clinical engagement may be beneficial for those testing positive for cocaine or methamphetamine. Given the limited access to buprenorphine treatment, these findings underscore the urgent need for expanded, accessible treatment models that can effectively serve individuals with co-occurring stimulant use.
自1999年以来,超过100万人死于药物过量,其中60多万人涉及阿片类药物。迫切需要注重药物过量预防的治疗方案,而丁丙诺啡治疗若在减少伤害的环境中提供,则是一种阿片类药物预防形式。2011年至2019年间,阿片类药物与兴奋剂合并使用障碍的增加速度高于其他合并症组合。本研究的目的是确定使用精神兴奋剂对丁丙诺啡治疗留存率的影响。
我们对143名患有阿片类药物使用障碍的患者进行了队列分析,这些患者于2018年至2020年期间在田纳西州纳什维尔市一家低门槛、以城市办公室为基础的阿片类药物治疗(OBOT)诊所开始接受治疗。在1个月、3个月和6个月时测量留存率。使用逻辑回归来确定兴奋剂检测呈阳性者和未呈阳性者之间的差异。
大多数患者为白人(83%)、男性(64%)、无家可归者(59%)且未参保(70%)。样本中存在一定程度的精神兴奋剂使用情况,基线时19%的人可卡因检测呈阳性,13%的人甲基苯丙胺检测呈阳性。在6个月留存点之前可卡因检测呈阳性的患者继续接受治疗的几率低0.279。此外,可卡因或甲基苯丙胺检测呈阳性分别导致在3个月和6个月时留存几率为0.284和0.258。
本研究考察了在低门槛OBOT诊所中使用兴奋剂对丁丙诺啡治疗留存率的影响。我们的研究结果与之前报道甲基苯丙胺使用者留存率显著下降的研究不同。相反,结果表明,使用精神兴奋剂的患者在资源匮乏、低门槛的环境中可以有效地继续接受治疗,不过增加临床参与度可能对可卡因或甲基苯丙胺检测呈阳性的患者有益。鉴于丁丙诺啡治疗的可及性有限,这些研究结果强调迫切需要扩大可及的治疗模式,以有效服务于同时使用兴奋剂的个体。