Taylor Mark, Callary Stuart, Thewlis Dominic, Bryan Rebecca
Medical Device Research Institute, College of Science and Engineering, Flinders University, Tonsley, South Australia, Australia.
Centre for Orthopaedic and Trauma Research, The Adelaide Medical School, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
J Orthop Res. 2025 Jul;43(7):1293-1302. doi: 10.1002/jor.26084. Epub 2025 Apr 12.
Cup orientation has been investigated in detail with respect to risk of dislocation, however, the impact on the primary fixation of cementless cups is poorly understood. The aim of this study was to assess the influence acetabular component orientation on the primary fixation of cementless acetabular cups using an in silico clinical trial framework. Finite element models of 57 implanted hemi-pelves were generated from CT scans of a cohort of end stage osteoarthritis patients. Each hemi-pelvis was implanted with the with cup orientations that bounded the Lewinnek safe zone (mechanical alignment +/-10 degrees) and an approximation of the extreme orientations reported in the literature (mechanical alignment +/-20 degrees). Bone strain immediately adjacent to the implant and micromotions (gap and shear micromotions) were used to assess primary fixation. Analysis was performed at the levels of the individual subjects and the entire cohort. There was minimal variation in all metrics within the Lewinnek safe zone. Micromotion, particularly inferior gaping, was more sensitive to cup orientation than peri-prosthetic bone strain, tending to increase with inclination angle. Both the peri-prosthetic bone strains and micromotions were moderately correlated to the average bone modulus. Individuals with low bone modulus were shown to be more sensitive to changes in cup orientation for both peri-prosthetic bone strains and micromotions both within and outside the Lewinnek safe zone. This suggests that assessing bone quality should be routinely incorporated into the planning process, particularly when considering cup orientations outside of the Lewinnek safe zone.
关于脱位风险,髋臼杯的方向已得到详细研究,然而,其对非骨水泥髋臼杯初始固定的影响却知之甚少。本研究的目的是使用计算机模拟临床试验框架,评估髋臼组件方向对非骨水泥髋臼杯初始固定的影响。从一组终末期骨关节炎患者的CT扫描中生成了57个植入半骨盆的有限元模型。每个半骨盆均植入了界定Lewinnek安全区(机械对线±10度)的髋臼杯方向以及文献中报道的极端方向的近似值(机械对线±20度)。紧邻植入物的骨应变和微动(间隙和剪切微动)用于评估初始固定。在个体受试者和整个队列水平上进行分析。在Lewinnek安全区内,所有指标的变化极小。微动,尤其是下方开口,比假体周围骨应变对髋臼杯方向更敏感,倾向于随倾斜角度增加。假体周围骨应变和微动均与平均骨模量中度相关。结果显示,骨模量低的个体,无论在Lewinnek安全区内还是外,对髋臼杯方向变化时的假体周围骨应变和微动都更敏感。这表明,评估骨质量应常规纳入手术规划过程,尤其是在考虑Lewinnek安全区以外的髋臼杯方向时。