Takizawa H, Gabra-Sanders T, Miller J D
Neurosurgery. 1985 Jul;17(1):63-6. doi: 10.1227/00006123-198507000-00010.
Estimation of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) outflow resistance (Ro) using a bolus injection method was carried out under normal conditions and in a state of artificially increased elastance produced by saline loading into the CSF space. These values of Ro were compared with Ro estimated by the steady state infusion method. Saline loading into the subarachnoid space decreased the buffering capacity significantly, as represented by the pressure-volume index (PVI), which was lowered from 0.72 ml under normal conditions of 0.56 ml during saline loading. The estimated values of Ro under normal conditions and during saline loading were 90.6 and 133.6 mm Hg/ml/minute, respectively. The steady state infusion method yielded an Ro value of 166.3 mm Hg/ml/minute. Ro was therefore considerably underestimated by the bolus method when used under normal conditions of resting intracranial pressure. Moreover, its error was bigger when Ro was higher. On the other hand, during the course of saline loading, the estimated value of Ro using the bolus method was not significantly different from that estimated by the steady state infusion method, even in the higher range of Ro. Estimation of Ro by the bolus injection method was more reliable when the buffering capacity of the craniospinal space was reduced.
在正常条件下以及通过向脑脊液间隙注入生理盐水使弹性人为增加的状态下,采用团注法对脑脊液(CSF)流出阻力(Ro)进行了评估。将这些Ro值与通过稳态输注法估算的Ro值进行比较。向蛛网膜下腔注入生理盐水显著降低了缓冲能力,以压力-容量指数(PVI)表示,PVI从正常条件下的0.72 ml降至注入生理盐水期间的0.56 ml。正常条件下和注入生理盐水期间Ro的估算值分别为90.6和133.6 mmHg/ml/分钟。稳态输注法得出的Ro值为166.3 mmHg/ml/分钟。因此,在静息颅内压的正常条件下使用团注法时,Ro被显著低估。此外,当Ro较高时,其误差更大。另一方面,在注入生理盐水的过程中,即使在较高的Ro范围内,使用团注法估算的Ro值与通过稳态输注法估算的值也没有显著差异。当颅脊髓腔的缓冲能力降低时,通过团注法估算Ro更可靠。