Pryde Michelle C, Rioux James, Cora Adela Elena, Volders David, Schmidt Matthias H, Abdolell Mohammed, Bowen Chris, Beyea Steven D
Dalhousie University, School of Biomedical Engineering, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.
Dalhousie University, Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.
J Med Imaging (Bellingham). 2025 Sep;12(5):051803. doi: 10.1117/1.JMI.12.5.051803. Epub 2025 Apr 11.
Objective image quality metrics (IQMs) are widely used as outcome measures to assess acquisition and reconstruction strategies for diagnostic images. For nonpathological magnetic resonance (MR) images, these IQMs correlate to varying degrees with expert radiologists' confidence scores of overall perceived diagnostic image quality. However, it is unclear whether IQMs also correlate with task-specific diagnostic image quality or expert radiologists' confidence in performing a specific diagnostic task, which calls into question their use as surrogates for radiologist opinion.
0.5 T MR images from 16 stroke patients and two healthy volunteers were retrospectively undersampled ( to ) and reconstructed via compressed sensing. Three neuroradiologists reported the presence/absence of acute ischemic stroke (AIS) and assigned a Fazekas score describing the extent of chronic ischemic lesion burden. Neuroradiologists ranked their confidence in performing each task using a 1 to 5 Likert scale. Confidence scores were correlated with noise quality measure, the visual information fidelity criterion, the feature similarity index, root mean square error, and structural similarity (SSIM) via nonlinear regression modeling.
Although acceleration alters image quality, neuroradiologists remain able to report pathology. All of the IQMs tested correlated to some degree with diagnostic confidence for assessing chronic ischemic lesion burden, but none correlated with diagnostic confidence in diagnosing the presence/absence of AIS due to consistent radiologist performance regardless of image degradation.
Accelerated images were helpful for understanding the ability of IQMs to assess task-specific diagnostic image quality in the context of chronic ischemic lesion burden, although not in the case of AIS diagnosis. These findings suggest that commonly used IQMs, such as the SSIM index, do not necessarily indicate an image's utility when performing certain diagnostic tasks.
客观图像质量指标(IQM)被广泛用作评估诊断图像采集和重建策略的结果指标。对于非病理性磁共振(MR)图像,这些IQM与放射科专家对整体感知诊断图像质量的信心评分存在不同程度的相关性。然而,尚不清楚IQM是否也与特定任务的诊断图像质量或放射科专家执行特定诊断任务的信心相关,这使得人们对将其用作放射科医生意见的替代指标产生质疑。
对16例中风患者和2名健康志愿者的0.5 T MR图像进行回顾性欠采样(至 )并通过压缩感知进行重建。三名神经放射科医生报告急性缺血性中风(AIS)的有无,并给出描述慢性缺血性病变负担程度的 Fazekas 评分。神经放射科医生使用1至5的李克特量表对他们执行每项任务的信心进行排名。通过非线性回归模型,将信心评分与噪声质量测量、视觉信息保真度准则、特征相似性指数、均方根误差和结构相似性(SSIM)相关联。
尽管加速会改变图像质量,但神经放射科医生仍能够报告病变情况。所有测试的IQM在一定程度上与评估慢性缺血性病变负担的诊断信心相关,但由于无论图像退化程度如何,放射科医生的表现一致,因此没有一个与诊断AIS有无的诊断信心相关。
加速图像有助于了解IQM在慢性缺血性病变负担背景下评估特定任务诊断图像质量的能力,尽管在AIS诊断中并非如此。这些发现表明,常用的IQM,如SSIM指数,在执行某些诊断任务时不一定能表明图像的效用。