Zubaer Ahmed, Akter Rime Shamme, Salahuddin Al Azad, Ayubur Rahman Mir, Hidehiko Sano, Shuhei Hoshika
Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Mandy Dental College and Hospital, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Department of Restorative Dentistry, Division of Oral Health Science, Hokkaido University, Graduate School of Dental Medicine, Sapporo, Japan.
J Dent Sci. 2025 Apr;20(2):1229-1235. doi: 10.1016/j.jds.2022.01.004. Epub 2022 Jan 22.
BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: Glass-ionomer cement (GIC) is bioactive and independent. Bioactivity, which is a big trend in restorative dentistry. When they actively stimulate with microbiological species besides their primary function of restoring tooth structure then restorative materials should called "bioactive" materials. The purpose of this study was to determine the bond stability and the change in interfacial ultra-structure of a conventional glass-ionomer cement bonded to dentin, with and without pre-treatment using a polyalkenoic acid conditioner.
The occlusal dentin surfaces of six teeth were ground flat. Glass-ionomer cement was bonded to the surfaces either with or without polyalkenoic acid conditioning. The teeth were sectioned into 1-mm stick-shaped specimens. The specimens obtained were randomly assigned to two groups with different periods of storage in water: 1-week and 3-year. The micro-tensile bond strength (μTBS) was determined for each storage time. Additional specimens were prepared for interfacial analysis by using Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM); they were produced with or without prior polyalkenoic acid conditioning in the same way as in the μTBS test.
There was no significant difference in μTBS to conditioned dentin and non-conditioned dentin (p > 0.05). The failures appeared to be of a mixed nature, although aging caused more areas of cohesive than adhesive failure in both groups.
Aging did not reduce the bond strength of the conventional glass-ionomer cement to dentin with or without the use of a polyalkenoic acid conditioner. Remineralized dentin layer were observed in both conditioned and unconditioned 3-years specimens.
背景/目的:玻璃离子水门汀(GIC)具有生物活性且独立。生物活性是修复牙科领域的一大趋势。当修复材料在恢复牙齿结构的主要功能之外,还能积极刺激微生物种类时,这类修复材料就应被称为“生物活性”材料。本研究的目的是确定使用或不使用聚羧酸调节剂预处理的情况下,传统玻璃离子水门汀与牙本质粘结的粘结稳定性以及界面超微结构的变化。
将六颗牙齿的咬合面牙本质磨平。使用或不使用聚羧酸调节剂处理,将玻璃离子水门汀粘结到这些表面。将牙齿切成1毫米厚的棒状标本。所获得的标本随机分为两组,在水中储存不同时间:1周和3年。测定每个储存时间的微拉伸粘结强度(μTBS)。制备额外的标本用于扫描电子显微镜(SEM)界面分析;它们的制备方式与μTBS测试相同,使用或不使用聚羧酸预处理。
经处理的牙本质和未经处理的牙本质的μTBS无显著差异(p>0.05)。尽管老化导致两组内粘结性破坏的区域比粘结性破坏的区域更多,但破坏似乎是混合性质的。
无论是否使用聚羧酸调节剂,老化都不会降低传统玻璃离子水门汀与牙本质的粘结强度。在经过3年处理和未处理的标本中均观察到再矿化牙本质层。