Suppr超能文献

不同玻璃离子水门汀对致龋菌抗菌活性的比较评估。

Comparative assessment of antibacterial activity of different glass ionomer cements on cariogenic bacteria.

作者信息

Naik Rahul Gaybarao, Dodamani Arun Suresh, Khairnar Mahesh Ravindra, Jadhav Harish Chaitram, Deshmukh Manjiri Abhay

机构信息

JMF's ACPM Dental College, Dhule, Maharashtra, India.

Bharati Vidyapeeth Deemed University Dental College and Hospital, Sangli, Maharashtra, India.

出版信息

Restor Dent Endod. 2016 Nov;41(4):278-282. doi: 10.5395/rde.2016.41.4.278. Epub 2016 Sep 20.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Glass ionomer cements (GICs), which are biocompatible and adhesive to the tooth surface, are widely used nowadays for tooth restoration. They inhibit the demineralization and promote the remineralization of the tooth structure adjacent to the restoration, as well as interfere with bacterial growth. Hence, the present study was conducted to assess and compare the antimicrobial activity of three commercially available GICs against two cariogenic bacteria.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

An agar plate diffusion test was used for evaluating the antimicrobial effect of three different GICs (Fuji IX, Ketac Molar, and d-tech) on () and (). Thirty plates were prepared and divided into two groups. The first group was inoculated with , and the second group was inoculated with . These plates were then incubated at 37℃ for 24 hours. Zones of bacterial growth inhibition that formed around each well were recorded in millimeters (mm).

RESULTS

The zones of inhibition for Fuji IX, Ketac Molar, and d-tech on were found to be 10.84 ± 0.22 mm, 10.23 ± 0.15 mm, and 15.65 ± 0.31 mm, respectively, whereas those for were found to be 10.43 ± 0.12 mm, 10.16 ± 0.11 mm, and 15.57 ± 0.13 mm, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

D-tech cement performed better in terms of the zone of bacterial inhibition against the two test bacteria, than the other two tested glass ionomers.

摘要

目的

玻璃离子水门汀(GICs)具有生物相容性且能黏附于牙面,如今被广泛用于牙齿修复。它们能抑制牙齿脱矿,促进修复体邻近牙体结构的再矿化,还能干扰细菌生长。因此,本研究旨在评估和比较三种市售GICs对两种致龋菌的抗菌活性。

材料与方法

采用琼脂平板扩散试验评估三种不同的GICs(富士IX、Ketac Molar和d-tech)对变形链球菌和远缘链球菌的抗菌效果。制备30个平板并分为两组。第一组接种变形链球菌,第二组接种远缘链球菌。然后将这些平板在37℃下孵育24小时。记录每个孔周围形成的细菌生长抑制圈,以毫米(mm)为单位。

结果

富士IX、Ketac Molar和d-tech对变形链球菌的抑制圈分别为10.84±0.22毫米、10.23±0.15毫米和15.65±0.31毫米,而对远缘链球菌的抑制圈分别为10.43±0.12毫米、10.16±0.11毫米和15.57±0.13毫米。

结论

在对两种受试细菌的抑菌圈方面,d-tech水门汀比其他两种受试玻璃离子水门汀表现更好。

相似文献

1
Comparative assessment of antibacterial activity of different glass ionomer cements on cariogenic bacteria.
Restor Dent Endod. 2016 Nov;41(4):278-282. doi: 10.5395/rde.2016.41.4.278. Epub 2016 Sep 20.
3
Antibacterial activity of selected glass ionomer cements.
Postepy Hig Med Dosw (Online). 2014 Jan 22;68:23-8. doi: 10.5604/17322693.1086069.
6
Comparative Evaluation of the Antimicrobial Properties of Glass Ionomer Cements with and without Chlorhexidine Gluconate.
Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2016 Apr-Jun;9(2):99-103. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1342. Epub 2016 Jun 15.
7
Streptococcus Mutans Biofilm Influences on the Antimicrobial Properties of Glass Ionomer Cements.
Braz Dent J. 2016 Nov-Dec;27(6):681-687. doi: 10.1590/0103-6440201600655.
8
Antibacterial Properties of Fluoride Releasing Glass lonomer Cements (GICs) and Pit and Fissure Sealants on Streptococcus Mutans.
Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2010 May-Aug;3(2):93-6. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1060. Epub 2010 Aug 17.
9
Antibacterial activity of triclosan incorporated glass ionomer cements--an in vitro pilot study.
J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2010 Winter;35(2):157-61. doi: 10.17796/jcpd.35.2.96747l52725n608x.

引用本文的文献

1
Effect of titanium dioxide nanotubes incorporated into conventional glass ionomer cement on L. acidophilus.
Braz Oral Res. 2025 Jun 2;39:e059. doi: 10.1590/1807-3107bor-2025.vol39.059. eCollection 2025.
3
Effect of conditioning and 3-year aging on the bond strength and interfacial morphology of glass-ionomer cement bonded to dentin.
J Dent Sci. 2025 Apr;20(2):1229-1235. doi: 10.1016/j.jds.2022.01.004. Epub 2022 Jan 22.
8
Dental Restorative Materials for Elderly Populations.
Polymers (Basel). 2021 Mar 8;13(5):828. doi: 10.3390/polym13050828.

本文引用的文献

1
Antibacterial activity of selected glass ionomer cements.
Postepy Hig Med Dosw (Online). 2014 Jan 22;68:23-8. doi: 10.5604/17322693.1086069.
2
Glass-ionomer cement restorative materials: a sticky subject?
Aust Dent J. 2011 Jun;56 Suppl 1:23-30. doi: 10.1111/j.1834-7819.2010.01293.x.
4
Evidence concerning the medical management of caries.
Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2008 May 1;13(5):E325-30.
6
Antibacterial activity of four glass ionomer cements used in atraumatic restorative treatment.
J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2007 Sep;18(9):1859-62. doi: 10.1007/s10856-007-3035-4. Epub 2007 May 12.
7
The global burden of oral diseases and risks to oral health.
Bull World Health Organ. 2005 Sep;83(9):661-9. Epub 2005 Sep 30.
8
The effect of inoculum size on inhibition zones in agar media using staphylococci and streptomycin.
J Gen Microbiol. 1958 Jun;18(3):670-87. doi: 10.1099/00221287-18-3-670.
9
Dental caries in the second millennium.
J Dent Educ. 2001 Oct;65(10):953-9.
10
The residual caries dilemma.
Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 1999 Dec;27(6):436-41. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0528.1999.tb02045.x.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验